Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Pet Peeve...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 October 2002, 02:51 PM
  #1  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

...'cos I'm that mood.

If an image has the properites of a hologram, it hologramatic, not holograhic

Hologram
Photograph made by means of laser, which when illuminated by another laser produces a 3-dimentional image of the ogject photographed

Holograph
Document wholly in handwritting of person in who name it appears.


What's do you call a word that, because of it's continues miss-use, ends up meaning what it's been mistaken with?

Old 29 October 2002, 03:07 PM
  #2  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Erm, sorry to disappoint you, but Dictionary.com has two definitions for the word holographic.

The 2nd defn matches your one relating to handwriting, but the first definition is:

- Of or relating to holography or holograms.

Oh, and according to the same site, there is no such word as hologramatic.


[Edited by MarkO - 10/29/2002 3:09:59 PM]
Old 29 October 2002, 03:10 PM
  #3  
ozzy
Scooby Regular
 
ozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

My personal Pet Peeve are smart @rses

Stefan
Old 29 October 2002, 03:12 PM
  #4  
Avril
Scooby Regular
 
Avril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Shouldn't that be 'IS smart @rses'?
Old 29 October 2002, 03:16 PM
  #5  
ozzy
Scooby Regular
 
ozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 10,504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

Funny you should say that, but I did think someone would pull me up on the reply.

Should it be 'IS smart @rses' or 'IS A smart @rse'

Either way, your names going on my blacklist

Stefan
Old 29 October 2002, 03:20 PM
  #6  
Avril
Scooby Regular
 
Avril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

wey hey!!
Old 29 October 2002, 03:22 PM
  #7  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

MarkO,

Yea, well. The Dictionary is wrong


PS. Is the word "dictionary" in the dictionary? Is the descriptoin "the book you are holding"?

Old 29 October 2002, 03:25 PM
  #8  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's wrong in more ways than one:
Photograph made by means of laser, which when illuminated by another laser produces a 3-dimentional image of the ogject photographed
Of course it's perfectly possible to produce one that's viewable using ordinary, incoherent, light. It's not a photograph either, it's an interference pattern. If you split a holographic plate in two, you get two holograms of the original picture (not half each). That's why it's called 'hologram' meaning 'whole image'.

Edit: if you've ever made a hologram, you'll know what a bitch it is getting all the beamsplitters in the right places such that one beam strikes the object, the other the plate, and the reflected light from the object strikes the plate. Then you have to develop the plate/film in total darkness if you've been using red lasers, as the plate/film is sensitive in the red optical band so you can't use one of those red lights to see. If you dump your hands in the developer instead of the water, it stings a lot [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

[Edited by carl - 10/29/2002 3:28:19 PM]
Old 29 October 2002, 03:32 PM
  #9  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Carl,

That quote was from my Little Oxford Dictionary (1983 - fifth edition).

Have a word with them.

Old 29 October 2002, 03:33 PM
  #10  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Shame you didn't use your little dictionary to look up all of the other words involved.
Old 29 October 2002, 03:34 PM
  #11  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Well, they're wrong. Or have all the holograms you've seen been illuminated by a laser?
Old 29 October 2002, 03:35 PM
  #12  
Tommy 2000
Scooby Regular
 
Tommy 2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

...is someone saying 'holographic' worse than following a slow-arsed tractor??
Old 29 October 2002, 03:36 PM
  #13  
chiark
Scooby Regular
 
chiark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 13,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Just out of interest, what is an ogject?
Old 29 October 2002, 03:38 PM
  #14  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

It's like an object, but in 3G.
Old 29 October 2002, 03:39 PM
  #15  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Come to think of it, what does dimentional mean? I don't think much of this Little Oxford Dictionary
Old 29 October 2002, 03:44 PM
  #16  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

And who exactly is this Miss Use, and why does she hyphenate her name? Does anyone have any pictures of her?
Old 29 October 2002, 03:46 PM
  #17  
DavidRB
Scooby Regular
 
DavidRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Languages change & evolve over time. Look up the original root of the word "gorgeous".
Old 29 October 2002, 03:48 PM
  #18  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Oi you lot!!! leave it out


MarkO,

I think the first option is there because of it's constand miss-use.
Old 29 October 2002, 03:49 PM
  #19  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

...and so on for:

properites (properties)
handwritting (handwriting)
in who name it (in whose name it)

What's do you call a word (What do you call a word)
because of it's (because of its)
continues (continuous)
what it's been mistaken with? (ending the sentence with a preposition )
Old 29 October 2002, 03:50 PM
  #20  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tommy,

Nearly
Old 29 October 2002, 03:50 PM
  #21  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think the first option is there because of it's constand miss-use.
Constand?

I think it's there because there's no such word as hologramatic.
Old 29 October 2002, 03:53 PM
  #22  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Carl,

I'm normally very particular in making sure that my spelling and grammar are correct in my postings. Thank you for pointing out my mistakes. Hope it make you feel big
Old 29 October 2002, 03:54 PM
  #23  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

And if there was, it would be hologrammatic.
Old 29 October 2002, 03:54 PM
  #24  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hope it make you feel big
Not at all, but you should get your own house in order before criticizing others for their use of English
Old 29 October 2002, 03:56 PM
  #25  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

MarkO,

Thank you too

The word does exist.
Old 29 October 2002, 03:56 PM
  #26  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Not at all, but you should get your own house in order before criticizing others for their use of English
<applause> Couldn't have put it better myself.
Old 29 October 2002, 04:00 PM
  #27  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks you chaps. I feel much better now I've been put in my place...
Old 29 October 2002, 04:01 PM
  #28  
MarkO
Scooby Regular
 
MarkO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: London
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Good. Job done.
Old 29 October 2002, 04:02 PM
  #29  
Nimbus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Nimbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post



EDIT: bolx. Can't even get the smilie right.

[Edited by Nimbus - 10/29/2002 4:03:22 PM]
Old 29 October 2002, 04:25 PM
  #30  
DavidRB
Scooby Regular
 
DavidRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

criticiZing
That would be the Queen's English then, would it?


Quick Reply: Pet Peeve...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 PM.