Silverstone - Lapping it Up
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Silverstone - Lapping it Up
Just for my own interest what is the answer to this please?
Which would be faster over say 10 laps at Silverstone in the dry - an F1 car or a race bike?
And in the wet?
Cheers, David
Which would be faster over say 10 laps at Silverstone in the dry - an F1 car or a race bike?
And in the wet?
Cheers, David
#7
Scooby Senior
We had a similar question recently about F1 cars against LMP1 (WEC) prototypes. IIRC the F1 car was about 7s/lap quicker around Spa. There are no times available for Barcelona which is a more twisty circuit than Spa and many reckon it would be much closer there and possibly the LMP1's would be quicker.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
We had a similar question recently about F1 cars against LMP1 (WEC) prototypes. IIRC the F1 car was about 7s/lap quicker around Spa. There are no times available for Barcelona which is a more twisty circuit than Spa and many reckon it would be much closer there and possibly the LMP1's would be quicker.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We had a similar question recently about F1 cars against LMP1 (WEC) prototypes. IIRC the F1 car was about 7s/lap quicker around Spa. There are no times available for Barcelona which is a more twisty circuit than Spa and many reckon it would be much closer there and possibly the LMP1's would be quicker.
#11
Scooby Regular
I remember speaking to a guy who had driven a fairly recent F1 car (a few years) ago
and he said that the most impressive thing about was not the acceleration but the breaking
if you weren't careful you would brake to a stop before you got to the corner because you invariably broke way way too soon
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 13 July 2016 at 08:43 PM.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll assume you mean downforce (given ground force was a mid 2000s gardening show) but yeah. Several years ago Top Gear did a race between a V8 Atom and a BMW S1000RR and the end result was actually quite close.
#13
Scooby Regular
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting comments, thanks guys. Silverstone is a fast track so I guess the cars would have the edge on top speed say 220 for a car and perhaps 190 for a bike or am I wildly out, I hadn't thought about the breaking though. There can't be much in raw acceleration up to say 140-ish but perhaps the cars have the edge.
I guess a wet track would favour the cars which can afford to slide around a bit although I am always amazed to see the angles that bikes can manage on a wet corner.
Looks like the cars have it.
David
I guess a wet track would favour the cars which can afford to slide around a bit although I am always amazed to see the angles that bikes can manage on a wet corner.
Looks like the cars have it.
David
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
This year at Catalunya the MotoGP bikes did race day on the same track layout as the F1 boys. Fastest race lap for the bikes was a 1'43.589 and for the F1 it was a 1'26.948. Perhaps worth pointing out that neither Mercedes finished a lap due to a small coming together...
#19
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
We had a similar question recently about F1 cars against LMP1 (WEC) prototypes. IIRC the F1 car was about 7s/lap quicker around Spa. There are no times available for Barcelona which is a more twisty circuit than Spa and many reckon it would be much closer there and possibly the LMP1's would be quicker.
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Interesting comments, thanks guys. Silverstone is a fast track so I guess the cars would have the edge on top speed say 220 for a car and perhaps 190 for a bike or am I wildly out, I hadn't thought about the breaking though. There can't be much in raw acceleration up to say 140-ish but perhaps the cars have the edge.
I guess a wet track would favour the cars which can afford to slide around a bit although I am always amazed to see the angles that bikes can manage on a wet corner.
Looks like the cars have it.
David
I guess a wet track would favour the cars which can afford to slide around a bit although I am always amazed to see the angles that bikes can manage on a wet corner.
Looks like the cars have it.
David
Coincidentally, a few years back Marc Marquez fell from his Honda down the straight at Mugello in practice, at 210mph, and slid down the track on his chin. He still raced that weekend.
As for lap times for bmw s1000r (wsbk) against motogp bikes, there really isn't that much in it, couple of seconds maybe. In fact, at this years IOM TT races padgetts raced a Honda RCV213 (motogp based bike) against superbikes and it didn't trouble the leading bikes. The rider did have an off in practice though so probably slowed him down a tad, but even before the off his fastest lap was a few mph slower than the superbikes.
#21
These F1 vs bike questions are virtually always cropping up on car forums as the car drivers are desperate to think their cars are quick (not you DavidLock).
As NeilH has said the aerodynamics on F1 cars are such that the comparisons are entirely pointless and meaningless. If you removed the aero from the F1 car the bike would be quicker, with it the speed differential around the corners means the bikes have no chance. The F1 car wins again on braking as the aero helps again (to begin with) and it has way more rubber on the road. The bikes actually accelerate faster and at some circuits have a higher top speed.
If you compare the bikes with cars without F1 aero the results would be circuit dependent, although the cars would firstly need a lot of power to get a look in in the first place.
And the bikes could be used on the road without much fuss, try that in an F1 car and see how you get on.
And all that aside, back on the road the bikes you can buy from the showroom for around 15K will still annihilate virtually any road car you can think of in all respects with similarly skilled users.
Unless it's wet.
As NeilH has said the aerodynamics on F1 cars are such that the comparisons are entirely pointless and meaningless. If you removed the aero from the F1 car the bike would be quicker, with it the speed differential around the corners means the bikes have no chance. The F1 car wins again on braking as the aero helps again (to begin with) and it has way more rubber on the road. The bikes actually accelerate faster and at some circuits have a higher top speed.
If you compare the bikes with cars without F1 aero the results would be circuit dependent, although the cars would firstly need a lot of power to get a look in in the first place.
And the bikes could be used on the road without much fuss, try that in an F1 car and see how you get on.
And all that aside, back on the road the bikes you can buy from the showroom for around 15K will still annihilate virtually any road car you can think of in all respects with similarly skilled users.
Unless it's wet.
#23
I'll concede the tyres bit, but the aero is still the thing that makes the big difference.
Unless it's wet.
That £15K showroom bike manages around 1000BHP/tonne without rider.
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Sorry about my dodgy maths, you're quite right re bhp/tonne with the Motogp bike about the same as the F1 car.
Not sure what you mean about the wet though, unless you mean that rain really seals the deal in favour of the F1 car.
On a slightly different tack, it's interesting that Mark Higgins got that Subaru around the TT circuit within a few mph of the fastest bikes. Assuming it didn't take off and land in a garden it would be interesting to see what an F1 car could do there, assuming you could find someone daft enough to drive it.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a slightly different tack, it's interesting that Mark Higgins got that Subaru around the TT circuit within a few mph of the fastest bikes. Assuming it didn't take off and land in a garden it would be interesting to see what an F1 car could do there, assuming you could find someone daft enough to drive it.
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah you'd need to redesign the suspension for a higher ride height and more compliance. Then you'd have to rework the aero package to allow for the loss in downforce. Then the wheels/tyres/brakes would all need looking at too. What you'd ultimately end up with would vaguely represent an F1 car at best.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's an interview with Higgins in Evo this month, makes for quite a good read. By the sounds of it unless something drastic happens with the bikes, then the right car/driver combination could at least match the bike times (not sure about beating them by any significant margin though).
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
There's an interview with Higgins in Evo this month, makes for quite a good read. By the sounds of it unless something drastic happens with the bikes, then the right car/driver combination could at least match the bike times (not sure about beating them by any significant margin though).
Apparently Higgins' car was well down on bike pace on the straights (some 40mph) so made its time up on the bends. A car with bike pace would probably crack it, but from the Evo article the ramifications involved to make the attempt seem so extreme that it may never happen.