Trump political rally wrecked.
#1
Trump political rally wrecked.
And forced to cancel, by left wing protesters.
And yet, we haven't seen the condemnation that would have occurred had it been the other way round.
How come when lefties cause something to be cancelled it's because they are protesting about scum right-wingers?
But if right wingers did it, it would be the scum right wingers doing it?
Double standards.
And yet, we haven't seen the condemnation that would have occurred had it been the other way round.
How come when lefties cause something to be cancelled it's because they are protesting about scum right-wingers?
But if right wingers did it, it would be the scum right wingers doing it?
Double standards.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the trouble. If you try to shut down opposing views through violent protest, it will not end well. Its a retrograde step, funnily enough a tactic always used by the left....
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Scooby Regular
my post was a simple quote from that well known socialist Ted Cruz, commenting on the Trump campaign
lol, you are so stupid - you do make me giggle
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 14 March 2016 at 07:34 PM.
#11
I would be suprised if any of the protesters were Democrats. It is far more likely to be Rubio and Crazy Cruz supporters with Rubio and Cruz's unofficial backing/encouragement.
#12
Scooby Regular
You demonstrate you are too thick to use the internet on a daily basis
You continually post regurgitated crap – that can be debunked with google
and 5 mins
But still you believe and post this rubbish
Yes off course violence is to be condemned
As is threats too
Trump – to a non-violent protestor after being assaulted by Trump supporters (you do believe in non-violent protests?)
"Maybe he should have been roughed up because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing."
Again – threatening violence at another rally
“If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you?". "I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees."
To another peaceful protestor – being escorted out of a rally (you do believe in non-violent protests?)
"I'd like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you. You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in in a place like this?" "They'd be carried out on a stretcher, folks."
which might give you a clue why even his republican opponents said
"When you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discourse "
#14
Scooby Regular
Lol, and you are a fvcking idiot
Read the thread back, from the top, post by post - and see who started using "names" and petty insults first
I will give you a clue it was not me you bellend
Read the thread back, from the top, post by post - and see who started using "names" and petty insults first
I will give you a clue it was not me you bellend
#15
OK, gloves off: you utter fukcing turd. You **** eating piece of scum.
I called you a lefty and a socialist. NEITHER is an insult, but if you want insults, well, I can do those all night.
Pig-fukcer.
Satisfied now?
Enough of the playground insults.
Try and argue like a bloke, not some daft lass.
Or shut up...you've shown what you have, and it's nowt. Typical socialist.
I called you a lefty and a socialist. NEITHER is an insult, but if you want insults, well, I can do those all night.
Pig-fukcer.
Satisfied now?
Enough of the playground insults.
Try and argue like a bloke, not some daft lass.
Or shut up...you've shown what you have, and it's nowt. Typical socialist.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sigh. Look I've done it in the past. I've taken hodgy to task over stuff. But the thing you need to realise is that people become entrenched. Once they are there, an aggressive attitude only makes them dig in deeper. Some are lost causes (martin), some are deranged (Jtaylor), but getting het up over the internet is actually giving yourself stress. Yes you may disagree, yes they may be ignoring hugely important points, but some people are strangers to reason. Learn to deal with it, and have a happier life. This applies to everyone here BTW
Last edited by warrenm2; 16 March 2016 at 01:47 AM. Reason: added last sentence
#17
Scooby Regular
OK, gloves off: you utter fukcing turd. You **** eating piece of scum.
I called you a lefty and a socialist. NEITHER is an insult, but if you want insults, well, I can do those all night.
Pig-fukcer.
Satisfied now?
Enough of the playground insults.
Try and argue like a bloke, not some daft lass.
Or shut up...you've shown what you have, and it's nowt. Typical socialist.
I called you a lefty and a socialist. NEITHER is an insult, but if you want insults, well, I can do those all night.
Pig-fukcer.
Satisfied now?
Enough of the playground insults.
Try and argue like a bloke, not some daft lass.
Or shut up...you've shown what you have, and it's nowt. Typical socialist.
You started the petty insults a name calling - and I called you out on it
It really is that simple
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From this point onwards, the webteam will be responding assertively (at their discretion) to any of the following conduct:
- Taking a thread off topic to solicit an argument about a subject of dubious relevance.
- Baiting (not debating) on contentious issues, or making things personal i.e. having a dig at someone, badgering them for a response, being disrespectful or otherwise trying to belittle their viewpoint/beliefs.
- Creating a thread where, at prima facie, the primary intention appears to be to ridicule another user's beliefs or incite a 'bun fight'.
- Posting anything that is deemed by the webteam to be conducive with inciting disharmony among members
- Ignoring a webteam request to put a member on ignore
- Taking a thread off topic to solicit an argument about a subject of dubious relevance.
- Baiting (not debating) on contentious issues, or making things personal i.e. having a dig at someone, badgering them for a response, being disrespectful or otherwise trying to belittle their viewpoint/beliefs.
- Creating a thread where, at prima facie, the primary intention appears to be to ridicule another user's beliefs or incite a 'bun fight'.
- Posting anything that is deemed by the webteam to be conducive with inciting disharmony among members
- Ignoring a webteam request to put a member on ignore
#21
"Ignoring a webteam request to put a member on ignore" that is absolute bo!!ocks. Is this 1970's Romania???? How can they seriously expect you to ignore someone at their request
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sigh. Look I've done it in the past. I've taken hodgy to task over stuff. But the thing you need to realise is that people become entrenched. Once they are there, an aggressive attitude only makes them dig in deeper. Some are lost causes (martin), some are deranged (Jtaylor), but getting het up over the internet is actually giving yourself stress. Yes you may disagree, yes they may be ignoring hugely important points, but some people are strangers to reason. Learn to deal with it, and have a happier life. This applies to everyone here BTW
#26
Scooby Regular
To some extend I do understand your frustration and passion regarding the "state we are in" after all I have 5 children so like you a vested interest in making things better - but I still feel your frustration/anger is misdirected
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by neil-h
...Just because the mods don't enforce the rules doesn't mean they shouldn't be followed.
"Just because you could, you didn't stop to think whether you should!"
Dr. Malcolm,
Jurassic Park.
Last edited by joz8968; 16 March 2016 at 11:33 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post