Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

God is "an evil, capricious, monstrous maniac"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 February 2015, 08:54 AM
  #1  
thenewgalaxy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thenewgalaxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lancuntshire
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default God is "an evil, capricious, monstrous maniac"

So says Stephen Fry, and I agree with him.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10015360.html

Not saying that I am aethiest, but I agree with Mr Fry a lot more than the majority of preachy religious figures.
Old 02 February 2015, 08:59 AM
  #2  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fry is a comedian and no philosopher.
Old 02 February 2015, 09:21 AM
  #3  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I quoted this on Boris thread in my #66:

https://www.scoobynet.com/1019253-bo...-wa-ers-3.html
Old 02 February 2015, 09:22 AM
  #4  
lozgti1
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,916
Received 71 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

He's a clever chap though,Fry.

Not that I agree with him...

Amazing how many Oxford/Cambridge bods decided on comedy as a career
Old 02 February 2015, 09:47 AM
  #5  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Fry is a comedian and no philosopher.
lol, another ridiculous post

"Philosopher", isn't a trade, like Plumbing or Plastering - you don't get a city and guilds in Philosophy
Old 02 February 2015, 09:50 AM
  #6  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Fat arrogant swine would do a line with god.
Old 02 February 2015, 10:06 AM
  #7  
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Blue by You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As usual, the eternal 'Is there:isn't there' argument rages on with not a snowball's chance in hell of finding the answer.

To me the greatest sadness of religious belief or non belief is that the zealots of both camps cannot be satisfied to let the other have their belief. And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.

If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?

Or is religion merely a device by which man's greed and inhumanity can be justified by claiming allegiance to a higher cause?
Old 02 February 2015, 10:06 AM
  #8  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thenewgalaxy
So says Stephen Fry, and I agree with him.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10015360.html

Not saying that I am aethiest, but I agree with Mr Fry a lot more than the majority of preachy religious figures.
I would put Prince Charles in there as well
Old 02 February 2015, 10:31 AM
  #9  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

He's got a point though...

Bone cancer in children... What's that about?
Old 02 February 2015, 11:06 AM
  #10  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You
As usual, the eternal 'Is there:isn't there' argument rages on with not a snowball's chance in hell of finding the answer.

To me the greatest sadness of religious belief or non belief is that the zealots of both camps cannot be satisfied to let the other have their belief. And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.

If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?

Or is religion merely a device by which man's greed and inhumanity can be justified by claiming allegiance to a higher cause?
And similarly, if you don't believe then so be it!
Old 02 February 2015, 11:09 AM
  #11  
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Blue by You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Exactly
Old 02 February 2015, 11:35 AM
  #12  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You
And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.
I can't think of any instances where atheists have killed theists solely because they believed in a god or gods. Sadly, the same cannot be said the other way round.
Old 02 February 2015, 11:56 AM
  #13  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
I can't think of any instances where atheists have killed theists solely because they believed in a god or gods. Sadly, the same cannot be said the other way round.
Soviet Union, China?

Last edited by JTaylor; 02 February 2015 at 11:58 AM.
Old 02 February 2015, 12:13 PM
  #14  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You

If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?
Originally Posted by The Trooper 1815
And similarly, if you don't believe then so be it!
Sure, but if I don't argue from one or the other point of view, then how can we justify my own existence as a logical or as an illogical being in relation with the one I'm arguing?

Both 'for' and 'against' arguers are fighting for their existence in relation with each other.

If we 'let it be' in either way, then we have solved the question of our own existence in relation with ourselves and given a peace of mind to others. That's another way to justify our own existence.

In a nutshell, God is just an excuse. What we want to do is put one other down for anything possible, in order to justify our own existence. We all suffer from existential crisis.

The atheists that fight God on mere supposition, they need to save their time. No point throwing punches in the air to justify your existence. You don't believe in God, don't fight Him. There's nothing to fight with, for God's sake!
Old 02 February 2015, 12:16 PM
  #15  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

An attempt at state control , Greek orthodox continued in Soviet union and Buddhism in China
Old 02 February 2015, 12:19 PM
  #16  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
Sure, but if I don't argue from one or the other point of view, then how can we justify my own existence as a logical or as an illogical being in relation with the one I'm arguing?

Both 'for' and 'against' arguers are fighting for their existence in relation with each other.

If we 'let it be' in either way, then we have solved the question of our own existence in relation with ourselves and given a peace of mind to others. That's another way to justify our own existence.

In a nutshell, God is just an excuse. What we want to do is put one other down for anything possible, in order to justify our own existence. We all suffer from existential crisis.

The atheists that fight God on mere supposition, they need to save their time. No point throwing punches in the air to justify your existence. You don't believe in God, don't fight Him. There's nothing to fight with, for God's sake!
One of my favourite public anti-theists, Sam Harris, says this.
Old 02 February 2015, 12:22 PM
  #17  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
An attempt at state control , Greek orthodox continued in Soviet union and Buddhism in China
And Global Warming for everyone else.
Old 02 February 2015, 12:29 PM
  #18  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
An attempt at state control , Greek orthodox continued in Soviet union and Buddhism in China
The Eastern Orthodox Church survived in the Soviet Union, it didn't "continue" and Buddhism is non-theistic.
Old 02 February 2015, 12:29 PM
  #19  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
One of my favourite public anti-theists, Sam Harris, says this.
I didn't know that, but I'm glad to know that there are some people out there who think like me.
Old 02 February 2015, 01:13 PM
  #20  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Soviet Union, China?
The Soviets and China killed people because they were a threat to them, not because they believed in God. An established religion would undermine the authority of the regime, so they had to go. Those regimes also killed lots of people who were atheists.

There has been no wholesale persecution of theists by atheists because they were theists alone.

Admittedly, the base reason is the same, fear in losing power, and that is a human failing, but atheists do not kill for their 'non-belief'.
Old 02 February 2015, 01:42 PM
  #21  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
The Soviets and China killed people because they were a threat to them, not because they believed in God. An established religion would undermine the authority of the regime, so they had to go. Those regimes also killed lots of people who were atheists.

There has been no wholesale persecution of theists by atheists because they were theists alone.

Admittedly, the base reason is the same, fear in losing power, and that is a human failing, but atheists do not kill for their 'non-belief'.
There was an ideology of militant atheism within Marxism (brutally played out within Leninism) that fundamentally opposed theism. It wasn't about power and nothing more; atheism was a central principle, a doctrine of communism. Theists were killed for being theists, it's well documented!
Old 02 February 2015, 01:57 PM
  #22  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
There was an ideology of militant atheism within Marxism (brutally played out within Leninism) that fundamentally opposed theism. It wasn't about power and nothing more; atheism was a central principle, a doctrine of communism. Theists were killed for being theists, it's well documented!
I am aware of what Marxism made of theism, but I still believe that the Soviet Union eliminated its enemies because of the threat to its power. Atheism in Marxism was almost an excuse. The Soviets allowed open religion to a certain degree, if they had been as idealistic as you infer, and as zealous as some religions, I don't think they would have allowed this at all.

But, even if we do accept this as a pure incident of atheists (Stalin trained to be a priest after all.....) killing theists, it pales in to insignificance compared to what religions have done over the centuries.
Old 02 February 2015, 02:09 PM
  #23  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
I am aware of what Marxism made of theism, but I still believe that the Soviet Union eliminated its enemies because of the threat to its power. Atheism in Marxism was almost an excuse. The Soviets allowed open religion to a certain degree, if they had been as idealistic as you infer, and as zealous as some religions, I don't think they would have allowed this at all.

But, even if we do accept this as a pure incident of atheists (Stalin trained to be a priest after all.....) killing theists, it pales in to insignificance compared to what religions have done over the centuries.
10-20 million Christians in a relatively short period of time by the Soviets alone. Not an insignificant sum.
Old 02 February 2015, 02:29 PM
  #24  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
10-20 million Christians in a relatively short period of time by the Soviets alone. Not an insignificant sum.
The problem with persecutions in the 20th Century is that the numbers look huge, but the percentages are small.

I did look this up once, but the crusades killed of quite a larger percentage of the world population that than the wars etc. of the 20th Century.

Of course, 20 millions sounds a lot, but as a percentage of the billions of the world, it's ain't so big. When you have a lot of people, killing a lot is easy.
Old 02 February 2015, 03:17 PM
  #25  
ReallyReallyGoodMeat
Scooby Regular
 
ReallyReallyGoodMeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fry is stealing other peoples' arguments!

Originally Posted by David Attenborough in 2002
But I always have to think too of a little boy sitting on the banks of a river in west Africa who has a worm boring through his eyeball, turning him blind before he's five years old. And I reply and say, "Well, presumably the God you speak about created the worm as well," and now, I find that baffling to credit a merciful God with that action.
Old 02 February 2015, 04:03 PM
  #26  
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Blue by You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Perhaps 'God' has to be considerate not only to us Humans, but to lowly creatures like the worm as well. Hence the sacrificial child?
Old 02 February 2015, 04:07 PM
  #27  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You
Perhaps 'God' has to be considerate not only to us Humans, but to lowly creatures like the worm as well. Hence the sacrificial child?
Not according to Genesis, God give man dominion over all the beasts. The pesky parasitic worm should know its place!

Unless, of course........................
Old 02 February 2015, 04:31 PM
  #28  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Great God quotes from 'Futurama'.

"Bender, being God isn't easy. If you do too much, people get dependent on you. And if you do nothing, they lose hope. You have to use a light touch, like a safecracker or a pickpocket.

When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."

Just about hits the nail on the head for me.
Old 02 February 2015, 04:35 PM
  #29  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
Not according to Genesis, God give man dominion over all the beasts. The pesky parasitic worm should know its place!

Unless, of course........................
............ the one who wrote Genesis was bias? Is that because he was a human prince who later changed his career and became a prophet? If that's correct, then that's a possibility.

I may be wrong, like.
Old 02 February 2015, 04:41 PM
  #30  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

God made man in his own image... bollox, any god worth his salts would be able to lick his own *****


Quick Reply: God is "an evil, capricious, monstrous maniac"



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.