God is "an evil, capricious, monstrous maniac"
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
God is "an evil, capricious, monstrous maniac"
So says Stephen Fry, and I agree with him.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10015360.html
Not saying that I am aethiest, but I agree with Mr Fry a lot more than the majority of preachy religious figures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10015360.html
Not saying that I am aethiest, but I agree with Mr Fry a lot more than the majority of preachy religious figures.
#3
#4
He's a clever chap though,Fry.
Not that I agree with him...
Amazing how many Oxford/Cambridge bods decided on comedy as a career
Not that I agree with him...
Amazing how many Oxford/Cambridge bods decided on comedy as a career
#5
Scooby Regular
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As usual, the eternal 'Is there:isn't there' argument rages on with not a snowball's chance in hell of finding the answer.
To me the greatest sadness of religious belief or non belief is that the zealots of both camps cannot be satisfied to let the other have their belief. And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.
If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?
Or is religion merely a device by which man's greed and inhumanity can be justified by claiming allegiance to a higher cause?
To me the greatest sadness of religious belief or non belief is that the zealots of both camps cannot be satisfied to let the other have their belief. And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.
If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?
Or is religion merely a device by which man's greed and inhumanity can be justified by claiming allegiance to a higher cause?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
So says Stephen Fry, and I agree with him.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10015360.html
Not saying that I am aethiest, but I agree with Mr Fry a lot more than the majority of preachy religious figures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10015360.html
Not saying that I am aethiest, but I agree with Mr Fry a lot more than the majority of preachy religious figures.
#10
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
As usual, the eternal 'Is there:isn't there' argument rages on with not a snowball's chance in hell of finding the answer.
To me the greatest sadness of religious belief or non belief is that the zealots of both camps cannot be satisfied to let the other have their belief. And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.
If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?
Or is religion merely a device by which man's greed and inhumanity can be justified by claiming allegiance to a higher cause?
To me the greatest sadness of religious belief or non belief is that the zealots of both camps cannot be satisfied to let the other have their belief. And people continue to die in defence of this pointless argument.
If you believe in a God, then there is one. Why can't we just leave it at that?
Or is religion merely a device by which man's greed and inhumanity can be justified by claiming allegiance to a higher cause?
#12
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
Both 'for' and 'against' arguers are fighting for their existence in relation with each other.
If we 'let it be' in either way, then we have solved the question of our own existence in relation with ourselves and given a peace of mind to others. That's another way to justify our own existence.
In a nutshell, God is just an excuse. What we want to do is put one other down for anything possible, in order to justify our own existence. We all suffer from existential crisis.
The atheists that fight God on mere supposition, they need to save their time. No point throwing punches in the air to justify your existence. You don't believe in God, don't fight Him. There's nothing to fight with, for God's sake!
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sure, but if I don't argue from one or the other point of view, then how can we justify my own existence as a logical or as an illogical being in relation with the one I'm arguing?
Both 'for' and 'against' arguers are fighting for their existence in relation with each other.
If we 'let it be' in either way, then we have solved the question of our own existence in relation with ourselves and given a peace of mind to others. That's another way to justify our own existence.
In a nutshell, God is just an excuse. What we want to do is put one other down for anything possible, in order to justify our own existence. We all suffer from existential crisis.
The atheists that fight God on mere supposition, they need to save their time. No point throwing punches in the air to justify your existence. You don't believe in God, don't fight Him. There's nothing to fight with, for God's sake!
Both 'for' and 'against' arguers are fighting for their existence in relation with each other.
If we 'let it be' in either way, then we have solved the question of our own existence in relation with ourselves and given a peace of mind to others. That's another way to justify our own existence.
In a nutshell, God is just an excuse. What we want to do is put one other down for anything possible, in order to justify our own existence. We all suffer from existential crisis.
The atheists that fight God on mere supposition, they need to save their time. No point throwing punches in the air to justify your existence. You don't believe in God, don't fight Him. There's nothing to fight with, for God's sake!
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
#20
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Soviets and China killed people because they were a threat to them, not because they believed in God. An established religion would undermine the authority of the regime, so they had to go. Those regimes also killed lots of people who were atheists.
There has been no wholesale persecution of theists by atheists because they were theists alone.
Admittedly, the base reason is the same, fear in losing power, and that is a human failing, but atheists do not kill for their 'non-belief'.
There has been no wholesale persecution of theists by atheists because they were theists alone.
Admittedly, the base reason is the same, fear in losing power, and that is a human failing, but atheists do not kill for their 'non-belief'.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Soviets and China killed people because they were a threat to them, not because they believed in God. An established religion would undermine the authority of the regime, so they had to go. Those regimes also killed lots of people who were atheists.
There has been no wholesale persecution of theists by atheists because they were theists alone.
Admittedly, the base reason is the same, fear in losing power, and that is a human failing, but atheists do not kill for their 'non-belief'.
There has been no wholesale persecution of theists by atheists because they were theists alone.
Admittedly, the base reason is the same, fear in losing power, and that is a human failing, but atheists do not kill for their 'non-belief'.
#22
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was an ideology of militant atheism within Marxism (brutally played out within Leninism) that fundamentally opposed theism. It wasn't about power and nothing more; atheism was a central principle, a doctrine of communism. Theists were killed for being theists, it's well documented!
But, even if we do accept this as a pure incident of atheists (Stalin trained to be a priest after all.....) killing theists, it pales in to insignificance compared to what religions have done over the centuries.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am aware of what Marxism made of theism, but I still believe that the Soviet Union eliminated its enemies because of the threat to its power. Atheism in Marxism was almost an excuse. The Soviets allowed open religion to a certain degree, if they had been as idealistic as you infer, and as zealous as some religions, I don't think they would have allowed this at all.
But, even if we do accept this as a pure incident of atheists (Stalin trained to be a priest after all.....) killing theists, it pales in to insignificance compared to what religions have done over the centuries.
But, even if we do accept this as a pure incident of atheists (Stalin trained to be a priest after all.....) killing theists, it pales in to insignificance compared to what religions have done over the centuries.
#24
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did look this up once, but the crusades killed of quite a larger percentage of the world population that than the wars etc. of the 20th Century.
Of course, 20 millions sounds a lot, but as a percentage of the billions of the world, it's ain't so big. When you have a lot of people, killing a lot is easy.
#25
Fry is stealing other peoples' arguments!
Originally Posted by David Attenborough in 2002
But I always have to think too of a little boy sitting on the banks of a river in west Africa who has a worm boring through his eyeball, turning him blind before he's five years old. And I reply and say, "Well, presumably the God you speak about created the worm as well," and now, I find that baffling to credit a merciful God with that action.
#27
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless, of course........................
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Great God quotes from 'Futurama'.
"Bender, being God isn't easy. If you do too much, people get dependent on you. And if you do nothing, they lose hope. You have to use a light touch, like a safecracker or a pickpocket.
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
Just about hits the nail on the head for me.
"Bender, being God isn't easy. If you do too much, people get dependent on you. And if you do nothing, they lose hope. You have to use a light touch, like a safecracker or a pickpocket.
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all."
Just about hits the nail on the head for me.
#29
I may be wrong, like.