My '00 Impreza GT Acceleration results!
#1
I have the pleasure announcing that I proved to myself my car really is quite darn fast
Time of day: night, cloudy
Air pressure: 1014mbar
Temperature: +11 Celcius
Relative Humidity: 85%
Measurement equipment used: G-Tech Pro
Surface: std highway, a bit dusty
Newish ('98?) BMW 540i did 0-100kmh in 6.3secs (with traction control) just like the manufacturer promises, and 0-400m in 14.3s if my memory serves.
97/98 C5 Corvette which had been tuned up a little (better airflow, etc.) did 0-100kmh in about 5.3 to 5.7 secs, and 0-400m in 14s @109mph. It is to be noticed that grip on 2nd gear was lost every time, causing the car go almost sideways ;-) The C5 could do better on a stickier surface and with better tires, we assumed.
What about my MY00 Impreza GT then? No mods, except K&N panel filter and Scoobysport back box. Tyres are Bridgestone S03PP 215/40R17,
40000 miles on the clock. First 0-100kmh (0-62mph) measurement was done on a bit moist tarmac, releasing cluth from 6000rpm, resulting excessive wheelspin. Driver plus one passenger were in, over 1/2 tank of fuel + 20kg of other weight in the trunk. Time: 6.1s - encouraging. Another try from 5000rpm and... 5.8s. I was happy.
Two more tries on dry asphalt with the driver only and 1/2 tank of fuel: 5.6s!... and another... 5.26s! I really felt the latter start being nothing but absolutely perfect, and my friends confessed they had never seen anything disappear so fast from standing still.
I only tried 0-400m once - the time was 13.91s @99mph (0-100kmh in that was 5.6s). Nnnnnice.
If you quote these figures, remember that real-life accuracy of the G-tech Pro is within 0.1s, so forget the 1/100ths.
This message was modified to add a picture and correct some issues - the G-Tech Pro was after all metric version, which I didn't remember.
-Fernis
[This message has been edited by Ari Fernelius (edited 08 October 2001).]
Time of day: night, cloudy
Air pressure: 1014mbar
Temperature: +11 Celcius
Relative Humidity: 85%
Measurement equipment used: G-Tech Pro
Surface: std highway, a bit dusty
Newish ('98?) BMW 540i did 0-100kmh in 6.3secs (with traction control) just like the manufacturer promises, and 0-400m in 14.3s if my memory serves.
97/98 C5 Corvette which had been tuned up a little (better airflow, etc.) did 0-100kmh in about 5.3 to 5.7 secs, and 0-400m in 14s @109mph. It is to be noticed that grip on 2nd gear was lost every time, causing the car go almost sideways ;-) The C5 could do better on a stickier surface and with better tires, we assumed.
What about my MY00 Impreza GT then? No mods, except K&N panel filter and Scoobysport back box. Tyres are Bridgestone S03PP 215/40R17,
40000 miles on the clock. First 0-100kmh (0-62mph) measurement was done on a bit moist tarmac, releasing cluth from 6000rpm, resulting excessive wheelspin. Driver plus one passenger were in, over 1/2 tank of fuel + 20kg of other weight in the trunk. Time: 6.1s - encouraging. Another try from 5000rpm and... 5.8s. I was happy.
Two more tries on dry asphalt with the driver only and 1/2 tank of fuel: 5.6s!... and another... 5.26s! I really felt the latter start being nothing but absolutely perfect, and my friends confessed they had never seen anything disappear so fast from standing still.
I only tried 0-400m once - the time was 13.91s @99mph (0-100kmh in that was 5.6s). Nnnnnice.
If you quote these figures, remember that real-life accuracy of the G-tech Pro is within 0.1s, so forget the 1/100ths.
This message was modified to add a picture and correct some issues - the G-Tech Pro was after all metric version, which I didn't remember.
-Fernis
[This message has been edited by Ari Fernelius (edited 08 October 2001).]
#3
Thanks
Clutch is still quite ok. I rather make the wheels spin than my clutch. Stickier surface might cause problems, but we had nice and cold weather...
I just release the clutch as suddenly as I ever can if I know the wheels can spin a little... which they will do the first few 15 feet or something. Surprisingly easy. I imagine I'd have more trouble on a sticky track, whereas those clutch experts probably have a benefit of such surface...
One MY99 standard Impreza GT also wanted to test against my car from 60mph to 120mph. I was WAY faster! I can't imagine just my panel filter and back box giving so much more power - they probably had 95RON fuel in the tank - I always use 98RON.
-Fernis
Clutch is still quite ok. I rather make the wheels spin than my clutch. Stickier surface might cause problems, but we had nice and cold weather...
I just release the clutch as suddenly as I ever can if I know the wheels can spin a little... which they will do the first few 15 feet or something. Surprisingly easy. I imagine I'd have more trouble on a sticky track, whereas those clutch experts probably have a benefit of such surface...
One MY99 standard Impreza GT also wanted to test against my car from 60mph to 120mph. I was WAY faster! I can't imagine just my panel filter and back box giving so much more power - they probably had 95RON fuel in the tank - I always use 98RON.
-Fernis
#5
Slapshot: 95 RON and 98 RON fuel are available on all fuel stations in Finland. The price difference between the qualities is marginal. If a liter of 95 costs FIM 6.50, 98 costs from FIM6.65 to 6.80...
In the 80's before these new clean fuels without heavy metals (rock! ;-) we had 95 RON, 97 RON and 99 RON.
All fuel stations sell the go-juice always with the RON-number name "95E", "98E" etc., which is nice. You always know what you get.
-Fernis
In the 80's before these new clean fuels without heavy metals (rock! ;-) we had 95 RON, 97 RON and 99 RON.
All fuel stations sell the go-juice always with the RON-number name "95E", "98E" etc., which is nice. You always know what you get.
-Fernis
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM