Notices

VF35 Spool vs MD321H

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 September 2009, 08:35 PM
  #1  
aXeL
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
aXeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default VF35 Spool vs MD321H

Hi,

Does anyone know which of these two units will spool faster, given the same application, i.e. were the VF35 to be swapped out in my STI8 PPP for the MD321H (Assuming optimal remapping in each case)?
Old 28 September 2009, 10:08 PM
  #2  
trevsjwood
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
trevsjwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,655
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I swapped a MD321H in for my VF34 on a 2.5 and the spool was similar, prehaps couple hundred rpm in favour of VF34
Old 28 September 2009, 10:21 PM
  #3  
Going 4 400bhp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Going 4 400bhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: On my real nice push bike!
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aXeL
Hi,

Does anyone know which of these two units will spool faster, given the same application, i.e. were the VF35 to be swapped out in my STI8 PPP for the MD321H (Assuming optimal remapping in each case)?
ST420 another one to look at maybe if cost is a iessue

I made 412bhp on the 380 turbo they do with a little meth


Last edited by Going 4 400bhp; 28 September 2009 at 10:51 PM.
Old 28 September 2009, 10:22 PM
  #4  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I doubt you'll find a quicker spooling turbo than the VF35 (apart from the TD04 from the WRXs) but the VF35 is a 340bhp turbo and the MD321H is a 400bhp turbo so the latter will involve some compromise with spool. I do recall one graph on here where the MD was as good in terms spool characteristics as a VF28 (another low-mid 300s turbo), which is deeply impressive! Cracking turbo by all accounts.
Old 28 September 2009, 11:02 PM
  #5  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Harvey has a new up-pipe for the MD321H which is supposed to help even more.... mine is a touch slow getting going, but then all hell breaks loose and it's 2 bar and beyond. (ecu limited to 1.65 bar & 392 bhp actually !)
I changed the whole exhaust system and de-catted too, so can't compare like with like, sorry.

dunx
Old 28 September 2009, 11:43 PM
  #6  
aXeL
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
aXeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That makes for interesting reading!

So basically I appear to be spoiled with my VF35. I'd like to have the car make 400bhp but still improve on the low end throttle response. I know 400hp is beyond the VF35 and my ideal would have been a 400bhp unit with faster spool characteristics than the VF35 but it sounds like this isn't going to be possible.

OK $64k question:

My car already has ported headers, modified induction and a slightly optimised PPP map. If I do the following would anyone hazard a guess as to whether a MD321H will be able to spool faster than my Stock STI PPP VF35 setup:

Lightened crank 'and other' pulley set from CDF Racing
Get the MD321H ported (if it isn't already)
Ultimate Racing low impedance 785cc injectors (with circuit for high imped. conversion)

If I can best the car's current spool-up and hit 400hp on pump fuel (without going so far as stroking) I'd be VERY happy. Do we think this is possible I am I just being
Old 29 September 2009, 10:49 AM
  #7  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can't expect a 20% bigger turbo to spool like the smaller one.

LOL, you need NO2....

dunx

Last edited by dunx; 29 September 2009 at 10:51 AM.
Old 29 September 2009, 01:08 PM
  #8  
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
lunar tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
Harvey has a new up-pipe for the MD321H which is supposed to help even more....
Does indeed Dunx The up-pipe is not specific to the MD321H but is designed to work well with GT Spec headers (which many people with MD321Hs are already using).

I fitted this up-pipe last month and these are my thoughts as emailed to Harvey:

Spool - slightly better (earlier). On a sequence of uphill bends near home, I was able to accelerate out of some of them using one gear higher;

Throttle response - definitely better - much better!. Going through the gears, even less response time for car to 'go' after every gear change - virtually instantaneous in fact;

Torque - more mid range thump;

Top end power. Doesn't seem quite as eager but I think that's because of the rise in mid range torque making top end torque seem less; Paul at Zen agrees and the power graph verifies this.


Hope this helps

To the OP, an MD321H with Harvey's up-pipe on GT Spec headers spools pretty much as quick as a VF35 on standard headers and is a massive step up in performance

Last edited by lunar tick; 29 September 2009 at 01:09 PM.
Old 29 September 2009, 03:07 PM
  #9  
trevsjwood
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
trevsjwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,655
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aXeL
That makes for interesting reading!

So basically I appear to be spoiled with my VF35. I'd like to have the car make 400bhp but still improve on the low end throttle response. I know 400hp is beyond the VF35 and my ideal would have been a 400bhp unit with faster spool characteristics than the VF35 but it sounds like this isn't going to be possible.

OK $64k question:

My car already has ported headers, modified induction and a slightly optimised PPP map. If I do the following would anyone hazard a guess as to whether a MD321H will be able to spool faster than my Stock STI PPP VF35 setup:

Lightened crank 'and other' pulley set from CDF Racing

Ultimate Racing low impedance 785cc injectors (with circuit for high imped. conversion)

If I can best the car's current spool-up and hit 400hp on pump fuel (without going so far as stroking) I'd be VERY happy. Do we think this is possible I am I just being
more like 380bhp with those upgrades. Put in a FMIC and fuel additives then you'd get closer to 400.
The MD will always spool slower, not quicker, whatever you do but the difference would be small
Old 29 September 2009, 03:48 PM
  #10  
petedotuk
Scooby Regular
 
petedotuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Buy a MD321T its the same price as the H. No problems with spool on a 2l and you will soar past 400 without the need to add more mods if you dont hit your target bhp.
Old 29 September 2009, 08:18 PM
  #11  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry was a bit slack, obviously.... it's a header related up-grade rather than a turbo specific part, "my bad"

So you rate it then

dunx

P.S. I wonder if he has one in stock....
Old 29 September 2009, 08:22 PM
  #12  
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
lunar tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Deffo rate it Dunx - get one! A significant performance gain for £150 Whereabouts you based? More than welcome to see what it's like (our specs are pretty similar) if you're ever up in the north
Cheers, Andrew
Old 29 September 2009, 08:29 PM
  #13  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Didn't I see your car in a well known (locally) Elvington establishment ?

I need help as mine isn't fully well, but I need a 2.1 stroker for xmas

dunx
Old 29 September 2009, 08:29 PM
  #14  
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Anger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 4,848
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Do you think it would help with the T as well ?
Old 29 September 2009, 08:59 PM
  #15  
brockalightus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
brockalightus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: underground
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petedotuk
Buy a MD321T its the same price as the H. No problems with spool on a 2l and you will soar past 400 without the need to add more mods if you dont hit your target bhp.
you sure about that??????????
Old 30 September 2009, 12:58 AM
  #16  
petedotuk
Scooby Regular
 
petedotuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockalightus
you sure about that??????????
When there is no other underlying problem Dazza!
Old 30 September 2009, 08:57 AM
  #17  
TingTongPJ
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
TingTongPJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Flocksville
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

another vote for a harvey up-pipe with the gt spec headers.

made a massive difference to my sc46 turbo i run on my car.

i run non vvt heads (sti v4) my spool up in 1/2/3rd gears in better by around 200rpm ish in 4/5/6th is around 500rpm sooner.

mid range punch is massively different pulls mouch more strongly.

makes drivability very different with no difference in boost. i run 1.8 bar on one map and

my car will hold 1.8 bar in every gear till the red line (obviously i've never red lined 6th gear but holds to 1.8 bar every time i use 6th).

i know the subject was about turbo's but if you use one of harvey's pipes with any turbo you are going to see a massive difference.
Old 30 September 2009, 10:03 AM
  #18  
brockalightus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
brockalightus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: underground
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petedotuk
When there is no other underlying problem Dazza!
when its proved the md321t is good for over 400bhp on a 2.0 sti and quicker spooling than a vf35 i will buy 1.........
Old 30 September 2009, 11:19 AM
  #19  
petedotuk
Scooby Regular
 
petedotuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockalightus
when its proved the md321t is good for over 400bhp on a 2.0 sti and quicker spooling than a vf35 i will buy 1.........
has been proved time and time again, a 450bhp turbo is hardly going to spool faster than 350bhp turbo
Old 30 September 2009, 11:53 AM
  #20  
Going 4 400bhp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Going 4 400bhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: On my real nice push bike!
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petedotuk
has been proved time and time again, a 450bhp turbo is hardly going to spool faster than 350bhp turbo
The T is only good on a 2.0 if you have VVT heads otherwise i would leave well alone.

And even if you did have VVT heads the H would still make a better drivers car on a 2.0 (It's not all about bhp boys)
Old 30 September 2009, 12:17 PM
  #21  
brockalightus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
brockalightus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: underground
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petedotuk
has been proved time and time again, a 450bhp turbo is hardly going to spool faster than 350bhp turbo
where is the evidence that a 321t is suited to a 2.0sti without lag lag lag....or even put your last 2 rolling rd figures up and prove me wrong.....
362bhp was it or am i
Old 30 September 2009, 03:31 PM
  #22  
petedotuk
Scooby Regular
 
petedotuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockalightus
where is the evidence that a 321t is suited to a 2.0sti without lag lag lag....or even put your last 2 rolling rd figures up and prove me wrong.....
362bhp was it or am i
390 actually on a sick car as you well know. I have a boost plot on another MD thread here Dazza, take a gander @ it and tell me if it's laggy! I also have a Delta dash for 445bhp @ the time of mapping. You brag about your Delta dash figures so you can hardly question mine.

Just you stick to your diy reconditioned turbos and when you manage to make it last more than 5miles then come back.
Old 30 September 2009, 04:28 PM
  #23  
brockalightus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
brockalightus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: underground
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petedotuk
390 actually on a sick car as you well know. I have a boost plot on another MD thread here Dazza, take a gander @ it and tell me if it's laggy! I also have a Delta dash for 445bhp @ the time of mapping. You brag about your Delta dash figures so you can hardly question mine.

Just you stick to your diy reconditioned turbos and when you manage to make it last more than 5miles then come back.
362bhp on your first rr....then u took it 2 another rr for a second go...390 on a set of rollers that always read high.....cant rem ever bragging about my dd figures.
And i will keep going with my turbo project thanks........
.........only sayin what every-1 else is sayin........please no more insulting private pm`s thanks.
I was not convinced of the MD`s performance figure`s on a stock 2.0 sti m8 but if u want 2 make it personal that`s up 2 u.
Old 30 September 2009, 05:45 PM
  #24  
petedotuk
Scooby Regular
 
petedotuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sad.
I must apologise for the envious person ruining this thread!

BOT
Old 30 September 2009, 08:32 PM
  #25  
brockalightus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
brockalightus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: underground
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by petedotuk
sad.
I must apologise for the envious person ruining this thread!

BOT








Old 30 September 2009, 08:35 PM
  #26  
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Anders_WR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had ported headers when I first fitted the MD321H and I think the spool was very similar to a VF35 with non-ported headers. I struggled to make 400bhp with the ported headers though, so fitted GT Spec II and hit 402bhp.

I've got one of Harvey's GT Spec up-pipes waiting to go on, so I'll post my thoughts when it's on. Won't be a completly fair test though as also fitting Lateral turbo silicon hose and CDF light weight pulleys.

Anders
Old 30 September 2009, 08:46 PM
  #27  
TH3_5T1G
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OK $64k question:

My car already has ported headers, modified induction and a slightly optimised PPP map. If I do the following would anyone hazard a guess as to whether a MD321H will be able to spool faster than my Stock STI PPP VF35 setup:

Lightened crank 'and other' pulley set from CDF Racing
Get the MD321H ported (if it isn't already)
Ultimate Racing low impedance 785cc injectors (with circuit for high imped. conversion)
Just throwing in my 2 Pence. 785cc's are overkill. 650cc's will be well up to the job. Even going a bit beyond 400
Old 30 September 2009, 09:01 PM
  #28  
brockalightus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
brockalightus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: underground
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
I had ported headers when I first fitted the MD321H and I think the spool was very similar to a VF35 with non-ported headers. I struggled to make 400bhp with the ported headers though, so fitted GT Spec II and hit 402bhp.

I've got one of Harvey's GT Spec up-pipes waiting to go on, so I'll post my thoughts when it's on. Won't be a completly fair test though as also fitting Lateral turbo silicon hose and CDF light weight pulleys.

Anders
were you running harveys gen3 up-pipe with his ported headers before fitting the gt specs
Old 30 September 2009, 09:43 PM
  #29  
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Anders_WR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockalightus
were you running harveys gen3 up-pipe with his ported headers before fitting the gt specs
I was running a harvey up-pipe before the GT Specs, but not sure if it was gen1, 2 or 3.

Anders
Old 30 September 2009, 10:27 PM
  #30  
Jay_
Scooby Regular
 
Jay_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole, Dorset
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Going 4 400bhp
The T is only good on a 2.0 if you have VVT heads otherwise i would leave well alone.

And even if you did have VVT heads the H would still make a better drivers car on a 2.0 (It's not all about bhp boys)
Totally agree A 321H is one of the best turbos for a 2.0L road car aiming for the 400 mark as it responds so well. Mine made peak boost of 1.7 bar at around 3600 with AVCS heads and would hold boost right up the revs no problem.

321T will run more power up top, but won't spool as well, so arguably not quite as useable on the road. All depends how you like to use the gearbox of course


Quick Reply: VF35 Spool vs MD321H



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:30 AM.