Notices

which is best? panel filters.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04 November 2008, 07:27 PM
  #1  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default which is best? panel filters.

which is the best panel filter to go for out of hks and pipercross,ive found the other makes eg green,k&n etc are a bit to expensive and cant really see the point in forking out? any help would be ideal as im going for about 300bhp. cheers.
Old 04 November 2008, 10:04 PM
  #2  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

£39 for a K&N..... a bit expensive?
Old 04 November 2008, 10:14 PM
  #3  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There is very little difference in power output regardless of which panel filter you use. There is a difference in filtration ability. On a car I was not keeping I would simply use the OE Subaru filter. On a car I was keeping I would go for a K+N simiply because it is reusable.
Old 04 November 2008, 10:44 PM
  #4  
Skooby53
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Skooby53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wish I had a pound for every time I have seen this question asked. Listen to Harvey on this, the only choice is throw away or reusable. That really is the only difference.
Old 04 November 2008, 10:50 PM
  #5  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I would beg to differ with that one, as that is certainly not what I found out when completing back to back tests on the dyno.
Old 04 November 2008, 11:05 PM
  #6  
Skooby53
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Skooby53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ah, conflicting advice! This is where it gets interesting. If you found a difference when doing tests it would be worth know which was best? I was under the impression that Harvey has done tests and found no difference?
Old 04 November 2008, 11:09 PM
  #7  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Prodrive did tests too, and guess what, any differences were negligible.
Old 04 November 2008, 11:12 PM
  #8  
T1000
Scooby Regular
 
T1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've tried standard OEM and the TSL Green Panel filter and couldn't tell any difference in performance. The Green (and others) are reusable though, also it makes more sound on the standard recirculating dump valve which I like
Old 04 November 2008, 11:18 PM
  #9  
Icarus_
Scooby Newbie
 
Icarus_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone had an issue with oiled filters causing MAF fouling?
Old 04 November 2008, 11:18 PM
  #10  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

A K&N panel filter gave a peak increase of circa 8-9bhp IIRC. That was putting it on and running on the dyno, then taking it off and running on the dyno and then repeated all over again. BUT... this was on a Newage, which has a better, cleaner path from the airbox and was on a Spec C, which has the bigger and cleaner inlet pipe. Regardless of these, it did make a difference which actually shocked us, when we tested.



Look at the lowdown on spool up, +20nm's for most part of that rev range.
Old 04 November 2008, 11:19 PM
  #11  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I am not suggesting you would feel the difference, but the difference is factual.
Old 04 November 2008, 11:31 PM
  #12  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
I am not suggesting you would feel the difference, but the difference is factual.
But factually miniscule on a '99 Classic.
Old 05 November 2008, 05:21 AM
  #13  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had a spread of 1.7 bhp across four pannel filters on an STi 3 Wagon running 335 bhp.
As the results were not what we expected we repeated the experiment the next day and got exactly the same results.
After much debate and arguement on here with some "experts" talking tosh, Mike Wood from Prodrive came on and said my findings were in line with what they had found.
The four filters I tested were O/E, K+N, STi and HKS Green Sponge.

I think the reason Shaun has found a bigger gap is simply that his air flow is far closer to the limitting ability of the filters in question.
Old 05 November 2008, 09:13 AM
  #14  
Adam K
Scooby Regular
 
Adam K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How is the ability to withstand water on OE paperfilters¨vs cottonfilters such as K&N?
I have de-norkeled my intake and removed the indicator giving quite an open path in for air -and water....
(I know tests 'have shown' performance losses with desnorkeled cars, but am planning to cut a bigger entry to the airbox)
Old 05 November 2008, 10:06 AM
  #15  
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
rickya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Herts/Middx
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

To repeat, I also think the performance differences are more to do with how the air gets to & through, all the way to the filter & avoiding heat soak. Rather than the filters properties itself. The filters properties are significant in terms of filteration.
Old 05 November 2008, 10:22 AM
  #16  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok,so which is the best?pipercross or hks? anyone?
Old 05 November 2008, 11:05 AM
  #17  
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
rickya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Herts/Middx
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would go for K&N or ITG. Iv read that HKS & Blitz do not have good filteration, will try & dig out test results from web.
Old 05 November 2008, 11:37 AM
  #18  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harvey
I think the reason Shaun has found a bigger gap is simply that his air flow is far closer to the limitting ability of the filters in question.
I wouldn't argue with that one Harvey, hence my caveat.
Old 05 November 2008, 11:53 AM
  #19  
172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
A K&N panel filter gave a peak increase of circa 8-9bhp IIRC. That was putting it on and running on the dyno, then taking it off and running on the dyno and then repeated all over again. BUT... this was on a Newage, which has a better, cleaner path from the airbox and was on a Spec C, which has the bigger and cleaner inlet pipe. Regardless of these, it did make a difference which actually shocked us, when we tested.



Look at the lowdown on spool up, +20nm's for most part of that rev range.
Then take into account the repeatbility and the result would be negligable.

One run doesnt make a true test.
Old 05 November 2008, 11:55 AM
  #20  
jsh1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jsh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My advice FWIW is to avoid oiled filters, I know of a few people that have had MAF problems with these

Jason
Old 05 November 2008, 02:17 PM
  #21  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

172sport,
That is why I stated the test was repeated.... which in fact was done at least 3 times (that is OE to K&N and back again) from what I can remember. I think that was enough to justify it was real!

I can bet your bottom dollar, Litchfield Imports and I did more testing than Mike Wood did with induction mods!!
Old 05 November 2008, 03:22 PM
  #22  
madey
Scooby Regular
 
madey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

What about the TSL group N panel filter (which is blue)? Will this one give any more power? Cheers, Mick.
Old 05 November 2008, 03:25 PM
  #23  
172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
172sport,
That is why I stated the test was repeated.... which in fact was done at least 3 times (that is OE to K&N and back again) from what I can remember. I think that was enough to justify it was real!

I can bet your bottom dollar, Litchfield Imports and I did more testing than Mike Wood did with induction mods!!

Maybe believe it if it was on an engine dyno, not so convinced on a R/R
Old 05 November 2008, 06:13 PM
  #24  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

172sport,
So you think it is unbelievable because it is not from an engine dyno?

Why do some think that an engine dyno is the be all and end all?!? There are now a number of rolling road cells in the UK that can achieve repeatable results..... that is the key thng when running comparisons, not what the figures are. IMO comments like that come from ignorance of being some what blinkered in approach.
Old 05 November 2008, 06:17 PM
  #25  
wiley
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
wiley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: dagenham a13
Posts: 7,865
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

if you havent got one already then a sti panel filter i heard is suppose to be the most decent

wiley
Old 05 November 2008, 06:25 PM
  #26  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how much is sti panel filter?how long does it last?and can i get one anywhere other than main dealer?
Old 05 November 2008, 06:38 PM
  #27  
hoskib
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
hoskib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: gravesend, kent
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99greenwagon
how much is sti panel filter?how long does it last?and can i get one anywhere other than main dealer?
the sti panels are a throw away item changed to service schedule. they're probably the dearest way to change your panel filter.

just go for a green or k&n and steer well clear of an ITG on a 99 scooby! thick, gloopy gunk all over the filter that will **** your MAF. i learnt that the expensive way
Old 05 November 2008, 06:52 PM
  #28  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

thanks for that.
Old 05 November 2008, 08:13 PM
  #29  
scooby-93
Scooby Regular
 
scooby-93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: scooby land
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just get whatever you fancy. with an k&n panel filter you can hear it sucking in air from 3krpm onwoods. well i could anyway.
Old 05 November 2008, 10:47 PM
  #30  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Can we just clear up something about oiled panel filters. K+N is an oiled panel filter and I am yet to come across any car with any problem from a K+N supplied filter.
When the filter is cleaned and re-oiled, you will not have any problem if you follow the instructions but if you are a numpty and soak the filter in oil then you deserve whatever happens, unless of course you cannot read.
K+N lightly oiled panel filters pass a lot of air as I have found and as Shaun has proven above and the light oiling (sensible light oiling) means the panel fitler has great filtration properties but there is not so much oil there that it has any effect whatsoever on the MAF.


Quick Reply: which is best? panel filters.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.