Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

horsepower figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
daveriley's Avatar
daveriley
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bolton
Default horsepower figures

hi, i have just bought an v7 sti jdm. with the car came a printout from a rolling road test that has recently been carried out. the engine power is 335 bhp, wheel power is 209 and torque is 404 Nm, being a total newbie is this normal (the difference from engine and wheel power) and what is the difference between Nm and ft lbs? any help would be grately appreciated. cheers dave.
Reply
Old May 18, 2008 | 11:11 PM
  #2  
shogo10's Avatar
shogo10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth
Default

404 nm torque is 297.94 lb/ft

Not sure about the wheel horsepower but 209 bhp does seem a bit low if the flywheel horsepower is 330 bhp??
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 04:10 AM
  #3  
Sc0oby's Avatar
Sc0oby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Default

330hp at the flywheel should that equate to around 230hp at the wheels? not eally sure if this is correct drivetrain lost of 40% for 4wd dynos?
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #4  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

330bhp should equate to around 260-270bhp@wheels, 209 is far too low.

Tony
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #5  
Fangoria's Avatar
Fangoria
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Default

It can depend which gear its run in
I used to have difficulty at Powerstation getting a reading in 4th - done in 5th the drag was much bigger and I had a power at wheels as ***** as this one is reading..........
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #6  
apalmer's Avatar
apalmer
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Default

rule of is 24% from lump to wheel
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #7  
jd5217's Avatar
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
From: over the hills and far away
Default

the results are dependant on which dyno has been used for the figures.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #8  
ex-webby's Avatar
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
Default

I suggest some people at first find out how certain RR's actually work their figures out, before disclaiming and suggesting how much the drag calculation should be...... without even knowing which RR was actually used.

jd5217,
Correct!

daveriley,
Which type of RR was your car run on. I will hazard a guess at a MAHA. If this is the case, ignore the PAW figure. All things being equal, your flywheel figure will be comparable.

Shaun
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #9  
daveriley's Avatar
daveriley
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bolton
Default

First of all thanks for all the replys, they are well appreciated. The printout is from powerstation if that helps.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #10  
ex-webby's Avatar
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
Default

lol - That is absolutely fine and believable. You have nothing to worry about.

Go to a Dyno Dynamics RR and you will get around the same flywheel BHP, but slightly more flywheel torque. All in, certainly in the same region.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #11  
jd5217's Avatar
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
From: over the hills and far away
Default

had the same question when mine was dynoed at Powerstation, but got told to ignore the wheel figures.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #12  
Claaarkio's Avatar
Claaarkio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Default

Wheel power is really the only thing you are interested in and will give indications of how fast/powerful the car is on the road. Fly wheel figures are much better pub talk though.

Dave
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #13  
jd5217's Avatar
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
From: over the hills and far away
Default

but as mentioned above the wheel figures from the Maha can be ignored.
Reply
Old May 24, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #14  
daveriley's Avatar
daveriley
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bolton
Default

thanks very much for all your replys, iam going to book it in at rc developments on tuesday to get a proper reading. my aim is 400bhp what do you all think on a jdm, will the engine be capable with standard internals?
Reply
Old May 24, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #15  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by daveriley
thanks very much for all your replys, iam going to book it in at rc developments on tuesday to get a proper reading. my aim is 400bhp what do you all think on a jdm, will the engine be capable with standard internals?

with a JDM, id say yes, a good type UK would have good enough stuff for 400bhp....just ...maybe a few bits and bobs here and there, turbo, injectors etc.

A sti jdm will be nearly 300bhp I think, so after a re-map and de-cat...your looking at 350bhp.........anyone care to correct me, am I thinking right with that?
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #16  
daveriley's Avatar
daveriley
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bolton
Default

I think the only things that have been modified on the car at the minuit are a 3" stainless exaust, dump valve and green panel filter. The fella i bought it of told me it has had a remap but there are no indications of that in all the receipts i've got. Think i'll wait till i've spoke to rc developments and see what they recomend, sure they will point me in the right direction.
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #17  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by daveriley
I think the only things that have been modified on the car at the minuit are a 3" stainless exaust, dump valve and green panel filter. The fella i bought it of told me it has had a remap but there are no indications of that in all the receipts i've got. Think i'll wait till i've spoke to rc developments and see what they recomend, sure they will point me in the right direction.
Yep, don't think you'll go far wrong with RC, got a great reputation, even if its a standard JDM sti though, it should still be running a good 300bhp or thereabouts.

Great platform for modding as they have stronger internals than the UK ones
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #18  
dabow's Avatar
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
From: notts
Default

good read, i'm alwas wondering on what sort of power my uk 95 has.

i keep hearing about the sti's being better/stronger.
but as i've put sti v4 pistons in my uk engine. should this not help the strengh at all?

living in nottingham. any good riolling roads around there
sorry if it seems like a thread hi jack...
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #19  
jd5217's Avatar
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
From: over the hills and far away
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyBFC
with a JDM, id say yes, a good type UK would have good enough stuff for 400bhp....just ...maybe a few bits and bobs here and there, turbo, injectors etc.
can happily do 400bhp on either UK or jdm.
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #20  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by jd5217
can happily do 400bhp on either UK or jdm.
Wasn't that sure with the uK one, id have thought a few new uprated parts would have been in order on the type uk, good to know though, seen as I have one, its just if it can run reliably at that spec...
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #21  
jd5217's Avatar
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
From: over the hills and far away
Default

turbo, injectors, fmic with cai, headers, exhaust, simtek ecu, fuel pump.

dyno dynamisc results 420bhp on V Power, 446bhp on 10% methanol.
powerstation results 464bhp & 394lb/ft on 10% methanol.

If you want 400bhp+ give Martyn a bell at Alan Jeffery - Engine Tuner they will put together a package for you.
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #22  
j16jrf's Avatar
j16jrf
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: newtownards
Default

yes i ran 340 at fly and 288 at wheels on my last set up.

Hoping for about 380 and 320 this time
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
Dr B's Avatar
Dr B
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

I have JDM v7sti , stock its 280bph , they come stock with forged pistons and con rods in comparison to the UK model , at present car runs 475bph as a daily drive , our gear box is good for 500bph . I have no problems with that power on stock cams and internals .
Reply
Old May 26, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #24  
daveriley's Avatar
daveriley
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bolton
Default

Thats good to know, did'nt really want to start upgrading the internals, sounds like heavy money.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wingnuttzz
Member's Gallery
30
Apr 26, 2022 11:15 PM
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
12
Sep 17, 2015 08:47 PM
matt12
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
4
Sep 14, 2015 09:36 AM
STI5300
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
0
Sep 8, 2015 09:19 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.