Notices

atf v's atw

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 July 2007, 04:55 PM
  #1  
p1prodrive
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
p1prodrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aka - Matt C
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default atf v's atw

whats the loss rate of wheel to flywheel power ?
Old 01 July 2007, 05:34 PM
  #2  
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Varies from car to car. 4wd tend to have the most transmission losses, as you'd expect. I'm sure people will weigh in with all kinds of figures, but in my experience, forget flywheel power and pay attention to wheel power. The more wheel power you've got, the faster you are, the less you have the slower you are. Simple as that.
Old 01 July 2007, 05:39 PM
  #3  
p1prodrive
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
p1prodrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aka - Matt C
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i understand that but most is measured from the fly
Old 01 July 2007, 06:08 PM
  #4  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its measured at the wheels then calculated back to flywheel by measuring rundown losses on most dynos.
Dyno Dynamics rolling roads just estimate a figure and add it to the WHP when run in shootout mode. If you want bigger numbers just pump your tyres up real hard

The losses are not a fixed percentage throughout the rpm/mph range, beware of anyone telling you they are !

Its difficult enough trying to compare different rolling roads flywheel figures, just forget about comparing WHP figures as the design and operation of the rolling road can put the losses at anything from 40-140bhp !

Andy
Old 01 July 2007, 06:24 PM
  #5  
p1prodrive
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
p1prodrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aka - Matt C
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah i understand all this just was wondering what 453 whp was in fwp

hence wondering the the percentage loss
Old 01 July 2007, 06:32 PM
  #6  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by p1prodrive
yeah i understand all this just was wondering what 453 whp was in fwp

hence wondering the the percentage loss
With respect, i don't think you do understand, if you are still asking this question.


Andy
Old 01 July 2007, 06:35 PM
  #7  
p1prodrive
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
p1prodrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aka - Matt C
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok
Old 01 July 2007, 06:57 PM
  #8  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What make of rolling road was it measured on ?
Old 01 July 2007, 07:30 PM
  #9  
p1prodrive
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
p1prodrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aka - Matt C
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have no idea just something i read on the nasioc.com
Old 01 July 2007, 08:05 PM
  #10  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thats even worse, USA WHP thats a completely different level again
Old 01 July 2007, 08:27 PM
  #11  
hoskib
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
hoskib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: gravesend, kent
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by p1prodrive
yeah i understand all this just was wondering what 453 whp was in fwp
bastid quick

from what i've read add 13% to the wheel hp as a conservative figure. sure this will be debated but it won't be too far off
Old 01 July 2007, 11:26 PM
  #12  
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL what he said ^^^ quick.

Something putting a genuine 453hp out at the wheels would be turning out at least 500bhp at the flywheel but there's no reliable way of telling short of removing the engine and putting it on an engine dyno, and then whatever it makes there on its own bears no relation to what it does when fitted to the car! But if you want a number, call it 500 horsepower. That's all it is though, a rough guesstimate and nothing more. As Andy says, it's not just a question of adding a fixed percentage back and calling it the trans loss. Trans loss is a lot more complicated than that when you think about everything involved - there's no way one single percentage can come close to representing it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oilman
General Technical
6
09 September 2007 10:12 AM
v5 man
Southern (England)
10
24 March 2007 09:01 PM



Quick Reply: atf v's atw



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 PM.