Notices

What bhp/torque have you got from your 2.5's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04 November 2005, 06:45 AM
  #1  
Scoobyslammed
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scoobyslammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,919
Received 26 Likes on 8 Posts
Cool What bhp/torque have you got from your 2.5's?

Just curious what people out there have achieved from there 2.5's... as will be sending my engine to Teg sport early next year to start work on the 2.5 rebuild....
What bhp/torque have you got from your 2.5's?
And what mods have been done?
Old 04 November 2005, 07:34 AM
  #2  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Suggest you go to Projects section also and do some searches on '2.5'

Mild seems to give 400x380 ish with a TD05 20g + support mods + mild cheque
Wild seems to give 540 x 450 ish with rotated Garrett + support mods + big cheque

Depending on the car, a gearbox will be needed and always a better than stock clutch.

If you are lucky one of the '2.5' guys will respond, John Banks in particular. Search on that name.

Graham.
Old 04 November 2005, 06:41 PM
  #3  
Scoobyslammed
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scoobyslammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,919
Received 26 Likes on 8 Posts
Wink

bttt, cheers will have a look...
Old 05 November 2005, 06:56 AM
  #4  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You'll get more results, info, specs etc for the 2.5 if you look on the Nasioc website. Plenty info there to have a think about.
Old 05 November 2005, 09:45 AM
  #5  
R25 sti
Scooby Regular
 
R25 sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is my 2.5 type R...md321,3"aps decat,aps top mount.etc.



this is my mates 2.5 wagon version 4,vf22,3"aps decat.
both cars have powerstation equal length headers,blitz sbcid boost controlers,lightweight flywheels.

Old 05 November 2005, 12:07 PM
  #6  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Killer torque!

Graham.
Old 17 November 2005, 06:31 PM
  #7  
drb5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
drb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 9,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What boost are you running, R25 sti?
Old 17 November 2005, 07:48 PM
  #8  
R25 sti
Scooby Regular
 
R25 sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drb5
What boost are you running, R25 sti?
max boost is 1.3 bar!
Old 18 November 2005, 01:02 PM
  #9  
M0NEY
Scooby Regular
 
M0NEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RIP Moneys Scoob 440bhp/470lbsft 31-07-08
Posts: 6,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just make sure you go to a good tuner.

My 2.5 - well the tuner had problems! lmfao. Car has now come away from him to be sorted properly!
Old 18 November 2005, 01:56 PM
  #10  
R25 sti
Scooby Regular
 
R25 sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

scoobyclinc did all the work to my friends and my car,although abit on the slow side we are both very happy with the results! Andy and mark built the engines and pat mapped them!..
Old 18 November 2005, 03:05 PM
  #11  
Dyney
Scooby Regular
 
Dyney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 6,812
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2.5 std internals, STI3 heads with a TD05/20g based turbo and supporting mods. Running 1.3 bar.
376bhp / 372lbft (with a slipping clutch)

Loads more to come with more mapping

Self built and mapped by Pat
Old 18 November 2005, 08:45 PM
  #12  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hope Alans ok with me posting this.
Slight punch of 1.4bar before 4000rpm, dropping to 1.2 bar at 4400rpm. Standard Injectors maxed out at raised fuel pressure.
2.5 uprated internals, STI7 JDM heads, TD06 based turbo.
New injectors will be going in once Scott Lawson delivers to Alan (2 weeks now ), then its 1.4/1.5bar to redline!


Last edited by P20SPD; 19 November 2005 at 09:10 AM.
Old 18 November 2005, 08:46 PM
  #13  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bit big

The graph doesnt do it justice. In 6th gear it has 1bar before 2800, and full boost by 3000, and it just pulls like a train.
Old 18 November 2005, 10:15 PM
  #14  
megabusa
Scooby Regular
 
megabusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P20SPD
New injectors will be going in once Scott Lowe delivers to Alan (2 weeks now ), then its 1.4/1.5bar to redline!
Erm, have you got the right Scott? I dont do injectors!!
Old 18 November 2005, 10:16 PM
  #15  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looking forward to getting my hands on this one again

ps Re the injectors It's Scott Lawson (flat4online)

Andy
Old 18 November 2005, 10:52 PM
  #16  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Why does everyone seem to think that the 2.5 is such a good engine to tune?
(well to a certain point )
If you look, the most powerful ones out there are either 2ltr or 2.33 and there is a reason for it

Tony
Old 18 November 2005, 10:57 PM
  #17  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2.5 is ideal for 400/400 though, 2.0 is sweet with a wide power band at 350/350. Regards the 2.33, just add those 2 together

Andy
Old 19 November 2005, 01:18 AM
  #18  
tweenierob
Scooby Regular
 
tweenierob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fcon Power Writer
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ah Megabusa!! so you are Scott Lowe...

I need some bonnet lifters, after seeing Adam's (and the price!) and here that you are the man?

Back on topic....

Where's my graph

Rob
Old 19 November 2005, 08:32 AM
  #19  
stockcar
Scooby Regular
 
stockcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: north east
Posts: 6,664
Received 379 Likes on 301 Posts
Default

Rob, your order left Friday..............be with you Monday.............

cheers, alyn
Old 19 November 2005, 09:02 AM
  #20  
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
AlanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why does everyone seem to think that the 2.5 is such a good engine to tune?
(well to a certain point
It's an easy way to get a wide band of torque ideal for road use. There's more to power than peak figures.
Old 19 November 2005, 09:08 AM
  #21  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry Megabusa i meant Scott Lawson, have amended post now.
Old 19 November 2005, 10:35 AM
  #22  
alexf2003
Scooby Regular
 
alexf2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how much is a 2.5 litre engine?

I know thats a piece of string question, but what would a short engine be rougly eiher whole or in parts?

Alex
Old 19 November 2005, 10:51 AM
  #23  
Kevin Groat
Scooby Regular
 
Kevin Groat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexf2003
how much is a 2.5 litre engine?

I know thats a piece of string question, but what would a short engine be rougly eiher whole or in parts?

Alex
Quick on to ebay and you'll find a new one from Graham Goode for £1,300
Old 19 November 2005, 11:11 AM
  #24  
scoobyDAZZA
Scooby Regular
 
scoobyDAZZA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: devon
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
2.5 is ideal for 400/400 though, 2.0 is sweet with a wide power band at 350/350. Regards the 2.33, just add those 2 together

Andy

Old 19 November 2005, 12:15 PM
  #25  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ignoring power readouts...what do std int'd 2.5s do on the 1/4mile?

Must say some of the graphs look very good.


Bob
Old 19 November 2005, 12:42 PM
  #26  
69WRX
Scooby Regular
 
69WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 348/330 on a 90*entry TD05 16G
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Ignoring power readouts...what do std int'd 2.5s do on the 1/4mile?

Must say some of the graphs look very good.


Bob
Would imagine that a 2.0l & 2.5l with the same BHP would be simular on a 1/4 mile run as BHP is what you need for this, However you might gain a little on pickup after each gear change due to the better torque.
Old 19 November 2005, 12:57 PM
  #27  
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
R19KET's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't under estimate the effect of torque ! A good 2.5lt, even with the same bhp as a 2.0lt, should kick the 2.0lt's backside.

Mark.

Last edited by R19KET; 19 November 2005 at 01:02 PM.
Old 19 November 2005, 02:39 PM
  #28  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In theory I'd agree with you Mark but in practice it has not been the case. Maybe the extra torque off the line make the start more difficult, or they don't rev as freely ? not sure why they don't shine.
Stevens 2.5 in the same car/driver/mapper as his 2.0 didn't deliver as expected iirc. John Banks 2.5 with some 100+ bhp more than Tuk's 2.0 was barely a few 10's quicker.

Andy
Old 19 November 2005, 02:40 PM
  #29  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think the key word there is "should"
Old 19 November 2005, 02:55 PM
  #30  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think gearing, lag and speed of gearshift explain a lot between T-uk's car and my old 2.5 setup. On the road up to silly speeds there was nothing between them with each of us driving our own cars, similar on the strip except the 2.5 terminals were higher - 121mph a couple of times and more 120mphs, ET never reflected that though. So always a driver's race, and the better driver won/made up a power deficit.

A TD05 on a 2.0 is still the benchmark all rounder for me.


Quick Reply: What bhp/torque have you got from your 2.5's?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM.