Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Alternative fuel rail design

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2018 | 08:46 AM
  #1  
Henrik's Avatar
Henrik
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 151
From: London
Default Alternative fuel rail design



Just sat on train musing.. would the above be an improvement on the Impreza fuel rails?

To my mind you'd get exactly the same pressure at the injectors, if the legs of the bottom t were kept the same length.

Also there would be less connectors (eg fpr and t piece could be directly plumbed together) and in fact the bottom t could come off that "lump" too.

No fuel hoses above turbo either.

Why would it not work?

​​​​
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2018 | 09:14 PM
  #2  
edsel's Avatar
edsel
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 1
From: Essex innit
Default

I can't see why not but have a theory: A pressrurised circuit/loop on a conventional parallel system will have more fuel in the pipes under pressure. Will the one pipe T'd off to the two rails be able to supply as much fuel?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2018 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
1509joe's Avatar
1509joe
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 318
From: Not sure
Default

I wouldn't think so another thing that would concern me is that any particles/sludge that dries out as a white residue (in theory there shouldn't be any) would have no escape back to the tank via return line.
Reply
Old May 1, 2018 | 08:14 AM
  #4  
Henrik's Avatar
Henrik
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 151
From: London
Default

I had a natter with a friend of mine yesterday regarding this, and he pointed out that they wouldn't necessarily bleed properly either.

I.e if the pickup ran dry on a corner, then all the air that got introduced would have to come through the injector, whereas on a conventional system most of it would end back up in the tank.
Could potentially be mitigated with a swirl pot, but that feels like a sticking plaster.


It's a shame, would have been nice to get rid of a bunch of pipes/connectors.
​​​​
Reply
Old May 2, 2018 | 11:11 PM
  #5  
360ste's Avatar
360ste
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
From: In the Flatlands of Lincolnshire
Default

A proper parallel fuel setup is best.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
powerwrx
Non Scooby Related
6
Nov 10, 2006 01:34 PM
ProperCharlie
Non Scooby Related
8
Oct 25, 2003 03:21 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 PM.