WR Prodrive Rear Silencer BHP
#4
On a MY02 (new shape) the BHP increase would be close to zero. See http://www.autospeed.com/A_1054/page1.html for why this is.
#5
Thats a very interesting write-up Theo, especially as it contradicts everything we;ve seen on rolling roads here after scoobysport full exhausts have been fitted to WRX's...ie significant peak power gains (250bhp?). I wonder if someones fiddlin figures to sell ECU's?
Chuck
Chuck
#6
Chuck ... I wish it was that easy.
I could back up what they are writing, but don't particularly want to get involved in a slaggin' match.
Note that I also don't work or favor any type of upgrade ... I'm clean in that department m8
Theo
I could back up what they are writing, but don't particularly want to get involved in a slaggin' match.
Note that I also don't work or favor any type of upgrade ... I'm clean in that department m8
Theo
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thought that does spring to mind Chuck is that they are talking about the "quiet" APS *with* Cat. All the power hikes that we have seen running Scoobysport systems and the like are a) quite noisy and b) cat less......
Matt
Matt
Trending Topics
#8
Getting back to the original point....
I have a WR Sport BB on my '00, and I was quoted 5-7bhp as Zippy says, but it also seems to pull better from low revs, and of course it sounds better!
You DEFINITELY need to tell your insurers though!!!
Cheers
Tim
I have a WR Sport BB on my '00, and I was quoted 5-7bhp as Zippy says, but it also seems to pull better from low revs, and of course it sounds better!
You DEFINITELY need to tell your insurers though!!!
Cheers
Tim
#9
this test is shows that just after the zorst was installed peak power was unchanged, but when we installed our centre pipe power gaines were not seen for a good few miles as the ecu had to 'learn' the new settings.
surly it would have been better to reset the ecu and run the car for a while to work out the true power gains?
surly it would have been better to reset the ecu and run the car for a while to work out the true power gains?
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
McBrun555,
I'm guessing you've got a <MY01? I say this because the MY01 dynamically changes the advance which means fairly instant results when these kinds of changes are made.
The MY99-00 seems to take a few miles to change and the <MY98 (or is it 97) basically needs an ECU reset to make the same changes.
Therefore, on the car APS were testing, they shouldn't need to do a reset.
Matt
I'm guessing you've got a <MY01? I say this because the MY01 dynamically changes the advance which means fairly instant results when these kinds of changes are made.
The MY99-00 seems to take a few miles to change and the <MY98 (or is it 97) basically needs an ECU reset to make the same changes.
Therefore, on the car APS were testing, they shouldn't need to do a reset.
Matt
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carnetix, Adams and Nitosport
Posts: 12,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the MY02 standard BB is the same as the MY01 then switching to the WR Sport should make some difference. The WR Sport BB rmoved the two 90 bends going into the stradard there releasing the aiflow a bit more.
I would have thought this would have given a small increase, I certainly noticed the better sound after the switch.
It is more open but not quite as open as other after market systems!
Mark
I would have thought this would have given a small increase, I certainly noticed the better sound after the switch.
It is more open but not quite as open as other after market systems!
Mark
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATWRX
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
88
01 February 2016 07:28 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM