New record for the 1/4 mile ?
#1
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Ok, not yet but this boy is going to be trouble
We ran some AP22 datalogs on John Bank's std internals 2.5 today.
The results looked very promising indeed. Normally I subtract 0.2 secs from the AP 1/4 mile times as there is no allowance for 'roll out' ie the 12" or so that the car moves before the timing beam is triggered at a drag meet. This adjustment has aligned my AP22 times with recent Crail and Elvington results.
So, considering that we also had 2 people on board (worth another 0.2 sec) the times were almost identical to my own best results Not bad for a damp surface
0 - 100 in 8.75 ain't to shabby either !!
The first set of numbers are from the same car when it was a 2.0 running approx 330 bhp.
UK Impreza Approx 330 bhp/310 lb-ft
60 ft 2.95s 31.3mph
330 ft 6.61s 66.4mph
1/8 Mile 9.48s 89.2mph
1/4 Mile 13.82s 102.5mph
0-60MPH 5.53s
0-100MPH 11.82s
UK Impreza Approx 430 bhp 400lb-ft
Run 1
60 ft 2.13s 37.4mph
330 ft 5.45s 72.6mph
1/8 Mile 8.05s 96.8mph
1/4 Mile 12.12s 124.9mph
0-60MPH 3.97s
0-100MPH 8.75s
UK Impreza Approx 430 bhp 400lb-ft
Run 2
60 ft 2.25s 40.3mph
330 ft 5.53s 71.2mph
1/8 Mile 8.20s 96.9mph
1/4 Mile 12.29s 124.9mph
0-60MPH 4.16s
0-100MPH 9.01s
3rd gear 40 – 90 mph
Start Speed 40.0mph
mph s bhp wheels
50.0 0.93 241
60.0 1.77 299
70.0 2.64 336
80.0 3.62 342
90.0 4.83 316
Pk Power: 77.8mph 350bhp wheels
We ran some AP22 datalogs on John Bank's std internals 2.5 today.
The results looked very promising indeed. Normally I subtract 0.2 secs from the AP 1/4 mile times as there is no allowance for 'roll out' ie the 12" or so that the car moves before the timing beam is triggered at a drag meet. This adjustment has aligned my AP22 times with recent Crail and Elvington results.
So, considering that we also had 2 people on board (worth another 0.2 sec) the times were almost identical to my own best results Not bad for a damp surface
0 - 100 in 8.75 ain't to shabby either !!
The first set of numbers are from the same car when it was a 2.0 running approx 330 bhp.
UK Impreza Approx 330 bhp/310 lb-ft
60 ft 2.95s 31.3mph
330 ft 6.61s 66.4mph
1/8 Mile 9.48s 89.2mph
1/4 Mile 13.82s 102.5mph
0-60MPH 5.53s
0-100MPH 11.82s
UK Impreza Approx 430 bhp 400lb-ft
Run 1
60 ft 2.13s 37.4mph
330 ft 5.45s 72.6mph
1/8 Mile 8.05s 96.8mph
1/4 Mile 12.12s 124.9mph
0-60MPH 3.97s
0-100MPH 8.75s
UK Impreza Approx 430 bhp 400lb-ft
Run 2
60 ft 2.25s 40.3mph
330 ft 5.53s 71.2mph
1/8 Mile 8.20s 96.9mph
1/4 Mile 12.29s 124.9mph
0-60MPH 4.16s
0-100MPH 9.01s
3rd gear 40 – 90 mph
Start Speed 40.0mph
mph s bhp wheels
50.0 0.93 241
60.0 1.77 299
70.0 2.64 336
80.0 3.62 342
90.0 4.83 316
Pk Power: 77.8mph 350bhp wheels
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fcon Power Writer
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quality!! Nice to read about some realistic figures and times instead of the recent 'pluck out of the air' figures..
So... John, how far into this are you? do you think you will break your target?? do you think Andy's record will go
Rob
So... John, how far into this are you? do you think you will break your target?? do you think Andy's record will go
Rob
#4
Well done John & Andy, excellent results - not long before you hit the 11's now
Andy can you estimate what power will be required to put a 1470kg below 10 0-100mph?
cheers,
callum
Andy can you estimate what power will be required to put a 1470kg below 10 0-100mph?
cheers,
callum
#6
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Johns launches were better than mine, he set the faster time, my one is the slower of the two !!
We had an interesting comparison (race ) with Steve's Sti 5 type R which was recently dyno'd at 406 bhp. I was in the type r with T-uk, JB was in his car with steve In a roll on from any speed the 2.5 just pulled out an immediate lead of 3-4 car lengths, the 2.0 seemed to 'almost' hold its own from 5500 rpm upwards, not surprising I suppose as they run the same turbo.
Andy
We had an interesting comparison (race ) with Steve's Sti 5 type R which was recently dyno'd at 406 bhp. I was in the type r with T-uk, JB was in his car with steve In a roll on from any speed the 2.5 just pulled out an immediate lead of 3-4 car lengths, the 2.0 seemed to 'almost' hold its own from 5500 rpm upwards, not surprising I suppose as they run the same turbo.
Andy
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East Lothian
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy.
That was a bit of fun today. (Scientific testing under lab conditions)
Certainly showed the potential for Johns car.
Also the definate suitability of the TD05/06/20g in normal driving conditions.
We were driving as normal weren't we mmm hh. mmm!
Just as a matter of interest.
What record, will John potentialy break.
Can't see in your new profile.
[Edited by sg72 - 12/17/2003 9:09:24 PM]
[Edited by sg72 - 12/17/2003 9:10:23 PM]
That was a bit of fun today. (Scientific testing under lab conditions)
Certainly showed the potential for Johns car.
Also the definate suitability of the TD05/06/20g in normal driving conditions.
We were driving as normal weren't we mmm hh. mmm!
Just as a matter of interest.
What record, will John potentialy break.
Can't see in your new profile.
[Edited by sg72 - 12/17/2003 9:09:24 PM]
[Edited by sg72 - 12/17/2003 9:10:23 PM]
#9
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
11.66 Steve
We need to test your car with the AP22 one day, bit short of time to do both them today, especially as I was having so much fun driving your car
Andy
We need to test your car with the AP22 one day, bit short of time to do both them today, especially as I was having so much fun driving your car
Andy
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norup, Denmark
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy,
You said that my 60ft was bad
That 0-100time is so fast,and so is the topspeed
On mine before the last bit of mapping it was:
0-60 4,07sec
0-100 9,32sec
330ft 5,16sec
1/8 7,83@ 92,71mph
1/4 12,08@ 116,67mph
Skassa
You said that my 60ft was bad
That 0-100time is so fast,and so is the topspeed
On mine before the last bit of mapping it was:
0-60 4,07sec
0-100 9,32sec
330ft 5,16sec
1/8 7,83@ 92,71mph
1/4 12,08@ 116,67mph
Skassa
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I asked steven to post when he mentioned this..
Let sort this out..
Lend me that old Absolute Poo twenty two... sorry ap22... ill pay all costs
David
Let sort this out..
Lend me that old Absolute Poo twenty two... sorry ap22... ill pay all costs
David
#14
DW,
quite sure JB can accept defeat
I just wish you would get a result to beat andy's 1/4 record before he sells his car. then I think the challenge would be back on and everyone would see what else he has in his bag of tricks, which is far from empty. we have just seen what he can do with standard internals .phase 2 was a quickish project in timescale, phase 3 was just mad . sworn to secrecy so you will just have to guess
I suppose it is easier and safer to wait until his car is down the road though
quite sure JB can accept defeat
I just wish you would get a result to beat andy's 1/4 record before he sells his car. then I think the challenge would be back on and everyone would see what else he has in his bag of tricks, which is far from empty. we have just seen what he can do with standard internals .phase 2 was a quickish project in timescale, phase 3 was just mad . sworn to secrecy so you will just have to guess
I suppose it is easier and safer to wait until his car is down the road though
#18
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
John, all year my 60ft times have varied between 1.8 and 2.2, average at TOTB was 1.9ish i think.
Good result BTW, all your posting is doing is making me more and more annoyed that i sold my 2.5 block!
T-Uk, convince Andy to send the AP22 down and i will get it on Davids car over Christmas, and see what it can do as a comparitor to Johns figures above. If time permits i will put it on mine, again as a comparitor. Shold give a good indication of what it will do when he finally takes it to an event with no last minute problems.
Steven
Good result BTW, all your posting is doing is making me more and more annoyed that i sold my 2.5 block!
T-Uk, convince Andy to send the AP22 down and i will get it on Davids car over Christmas, and see what it can do as a comparitor to Johns figures above. If time permits i will put it on mine, again as a comparitor. Shold give a good indication of what it will do when he finally takes it to an event with no last minute problems.
Steven
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norup, Denmark
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just thought that i could do better,as Andy said that my 60ft at 1,87sec was bad,i even thought i was bad ,as i can see on the US bbs that they do from 1,5-1,7sec.
Maybe my time wasn´t as bad as i thought
Skassa
[Edited by Denmark - 12/18/2003 10:52:20 AM]
[Edited by Denmark - 12/18/2003 10:54:55 AM]
Maybe my time wasn´t as bad as i thought
Skassa
[Edited by Denmark - 12/18/2003 10:52:20 AM]
[Edited by Denmark - 12/18/2003 10:54:55 AM]
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
So with practice I might get 0.2 to 0.3 off it, especially if it is dry?
My target is about another 20 BHP and <12s 1/4.
Removing the MAF sensor should speed up gearchanges by removing hiccups, water injection should get a bit more power, as should a freer flowing filter. Then I have the option of fitting a clipped turbine wheel.
What these numbers taught me is that with a modest peak power figure you can still get a reasonable time if your average power through the run is high (my power curve is fairly flat from 5000-7000 RPM so I am always working around peak power rather than dropping back on a gearchange). The area under the curve tells the story more than the modest peaks I think. Makes me reluctant to necessarily fit a larger turbo, and also backs up Andy's experience of still managing 11.8ish with a TD05 with far less power than his TD06.
[Edited by john banks - 12/18/2003 11:26:21 AM]
My target is about another 20 BHP and <12s 1/4.
Removing the MAF sensor should speed up gearchanges by removing hiccups, water injection should get a bit more power, as should a freer flowing filter. Then I have the option of fitting a clipped turbine wheel.
What these numbers taught me is that with a modest peak power figure you can still get a reasonable time if your average power through the run is high (my power curve is fairly flat from 5000-7000 RPM so I am always working around peak power rather than dropping back on a gearchange). The area under the curve tells the story more than the modest peaks I think. Makes me reluctant to necessarily fit a larger turbo, and also backs up Andy's experience of still managing 11.8ish with a TD05 with far less power than his TD06.
[Edited by john banks - 12/18/2003 11:26:21 AM]
#21
steven,
the problem is that andy can't afford to see his title go until his car is away
he has already bought most of the major bits for "project loon" which will eat any scoob . the last thing his rather small ego could accept , would be having the second fastest scoob in the UK.
I really do not see him sending the AP22 until his car is sold
are there any 1/4 days coming up down your way?
edit to add a g
[Edited by T-uk - 12/18/2003 12:13:51 PM]
the problem is that andy can't afford to see his title go until his car is away
he has already bought most of the major bits for "project loon" which will eat any scoob . the last thing his rather small ego could accept , would be having the second fastest scoob in the UK.
I really do not see him sending the AP22 until his car is sold
are there any 1/4 days coming up down your way?
edit to add a g
[Edited by T-uk - 12/18/2003 12:13:51 PM]
#22
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can send my AP22 over for you to play with, if covering the shipping costs still stands.....and I get it back within 6 weeks (by which time my *superior* ej25 motor should be in....maybe )
Richard
Richard
#25
Subaru engine with rear diff bolts straight on, wheels bolted directly to gearbox and diff
I look forward to seeing it, I assume it's along the lines of what was talked about earlier in the year.
Paul
I look forward to seeing it, I assume it's along the lines of what was talked about earlier in the year.
Paul
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Well good luck with you project.. and wish me luck with my new one
Need it to warm up so I can finish the body work on the scoob and on new project.
Steven.. did you get chance to pick up the bits for the plasma cutter? (ill ring you tonight if you dont see this, as I dont have email at the mo )
David
Need it to warm up so I can finish the body work on the scoob and on new project.
Steven.. did you get chance to pick up the bits for the plasma cutter? (ill ring you tonight if you dont see this, as I dont have email at the mo )
David