Performance wise: DeltaDash reports...
28 May 2002, 04:30 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
just ordered the DeltaDash/Tek1 combo from Ecutek(nice guys!
) and still pretty amazed at how the car feels after a simple ECU swap. Smoother running, more oomph on top, and loads of information for your coffee-sipping pleasure! After verifying the car's running safely rich on full chat i decided to give it a real go one night, and these are performance figures i obtained after several runs (100 kph in third and GO!)
100 - 110 0.9 secs
110 - 120 0.6
120 - 130 1.2
130 - 140 0.9
140 - 150 2.0 (into fourth)
150 - 160 1.3
160 - 170 1.7
170 - 180 1.9
180 - 190 2.7 (into fifth)
190 - 200 2.5
200 - 210 3.2
210 - 220 4.0
220 - 230 4.9
230 - 240 chickened out!
these are very rough estimates at best, but give a good idea of how the car performes since very similar numbers were obtained at different runs.
Test was conducted at an yet closed stretch of motorway in northern taiwan, ambient temp around 24 celsius and about sea-level.
Car's a MY00 with Tek1 ECU, cone filter, JUN manifold, full catless exhaust (2.75-inch), lightened pulley and flywheel, with a Dawes running 16.8 PSI peak and holding at 15.2 PSI at around 5800 rpm in fifth, according to the deltadash.
So, i'd like to hear any comment you might have on these performance figures. i know they look prety good when compared to unmodded UK turbos, but what about STIs? or any other performance cars? This is not a mine's-bigger-than-yours mentality, just honest curiosity on knowning how good my car's doing as compared to other perforance metals.
cheers,
Robert
just ordered the DeltaDash/Tek1 combo from Ecutek(nice guys!
) and still pretty amazed at how the car feels after a simple ECU swap. Smoother running, more oomph on top, and loads of information for your coffee-sipping pleasure! After verifying the car's running safely rich on full chat i decided to give it a real go one night, and these are performance figures i obtained after several runs (100 kph in third and GO!)100 - 110 0.9 secs
110 - 120 0.6
120 - 130 1.2
130 - 140 0.9
140 - 150 2.0 (into fourth)
150 - 160 1.3
160 - 170 1.7
170 - 180 1.9
180 - 190 2.7 (into fifth)
190 - 200 2.5
200 - 210 3.2
210 - 220 4.0
220 - 230 4.9
230 - 240 chickened out!
these are very rough estimates at best, but give a good idea of how the car performes since very similar numbers were obtained at different runs.
Test was conducted at an yet closed stretch of motorway in northern taiwan, ambient temp around 24 celsius and about sea-level.
Car's a MY00 with Tek1 ECU, cone filter, JUN manifold, full catless exhaust (2.75-inch), lightened pulley and flywheel, with a Dawes running 16.8 PSI peak and holding at 15.2 PSI at around 5800 rpm in fifth, according to the deltadash.
So, i'd like to hear any comment you might have on these performance figures. i know they look prety good when compared to unmodded UK turbos, but what about STIs? or any other performance cars? This is not a mine's-bigger-than-yours mentality, just honest curiosity on knowning how good my car's doing as compared to other perforance metals.
cheers,
Robert
28 May 2002, 05:13 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
8.5 seconds 2000-7000 RPM in 3rd gear floored the throttle from 1500 RPM. Sorry I haven't recorded vehicle speed recently. Tek 3 TD04L hybrid ported OEM manifold turbo back exhaust ITG panel filter 20-21 peak 20 PSI held (but not in 3rd gear - more like 20 peak 19-19.5 held). Note the different gearing of STis in you comparisons - it will favour them 
[Edited by john banks - 5/28/2002 5:21:41 PM]
[Edited by john banks - 5/28/2002 5:21:41 PM]
28 May 2002, 06:38 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, here we go, MY00 (241bhp/247ft-lbs running 1.0 bar boost), boot in 3rd @28mph 2100rpm) to 70mph (5400rpm) (ran out of road 
) = 9.4 seconds.
Note that this includes spool up time. A sub-section of that without the spool up time, @36
mph (2910rpm) to 70mph (5400rpm) = 5.2 seconds
Unfortunately, the intercooler was a little hot and the car is clearly nothing special but some figures to gauge yours by none the less....
Matt
) = 9.4 seconds.Note that this includes spool up time. A sub-section of that without the spool up time, @36
mph (2910rpm) to 70mph (5400rpm) = 5.2 seconds
Unfortunately, the intercooler was a little hot and the car is clearly nothing special but some figures to gauge yours by none the less....
Matt
28 May 2002, 09:00 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greece, previously Syd Australia
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With 13.6psi boost only, 2900revs to 5400revs 4.6 seconds. I usually run 17 psi but I have no logs starting from 2900 with 17psi boost.
Speed with 13.9psi boost peak, dropping to around 13.3psi, due to hot weather, 102kph to 112kph 0.86 seconds and 122kph to 132kph 0.865secs in third. In hot conditions, 28 degrees celsius.
Cheers,
wrexy.
[Edited by WREXY - 5/28/2002 9:09:27 PM]
Speed with 13.9psi boost peak, dropping to around 13.3psi, due to hot weather, 102kph to 112kph 0.86 seconds and 122kph to 132kph 0.865secs in third. In hot conditions, 28 degrees celsius.
Cheers,
wrexy.
[Edited by WREXY - 5/28/2002 9:09:27 PM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM