Calling all Firewall NG gurus
12 January 2003, 02:00 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, after the dell problem, I have yet another problem related to firewalls. We managed to get the firewall running with a few minor problems (lost arps under w2k anyone).
So its all up and running. However, when I try to use securemote I keep being told that the communication failed even though I logged on with the correct password and username. It logs me on but then disconnects.
However if I do this with a nildram dialup connection, it works fine with no problems. Anyone encountered this before ? Any ideas ?
Much appreciated if anyone can help me fix it.
So its all up and running. However, when I try to use securemote I keep being told that the communication failed even though I logged on with the correct password and username. It logs me on but then disconnects.
However if I do this with a nildram dialup connection, it works fine with no problems. Anyone encountered this before ? Any ideas ?
Much appreciated if anyone can help me fix it.
12 January 2003, 02:59 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Stuey
What SP u running for Win2k, lost arps was an issue esp with checkpoint
allegedly SP3 for win2k fixes this
Steve
What SP u running for Win2k, lost arps was an issue esp with checkpoint
allegedly SP3 for win2k fixes this
Steve
12 January 2003, 03:06 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Gary,
Managed to fix the lost arps (known issue with hotfix that worked) Strange thing was that SP3 was already installed. Just trying to fix the Securemote feature.
Managed to fix the lost arps (known issue with hotfix that worked) Strange thing was that SP3 was already installed. Just trying to fix the Securemote feature.
12 January 2003, 03:48 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now there you have me as I havent got access directly to the firewall from the adsl connection because the s/w is at work. I will look first thing tommorow and post it. Thanks for the help btw
12 January 2003, 06:47 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mention ADSL ?
Are you on a shared ADSL connection ? (ADSL "router") or a single machine on the ADSL.
If you are using NAT on the router, you need to "tweak" your firewall to allow for securemote and NAT.
J.
Are you on a shared ADSL connection ? (ADSL "router") or a single machine on the ADSL.
If you are using NAT on the router, you need to "tweak" your firewall to allow for securemote and NAT.
J.
12 January 2003, 07:06 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kingston ( Surrey, not Jamaica )
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My secureremote client shows on the CP-FW1/VPN1 link as it's internal 192.168.n.n address.
This caused a few scratches of heads initially as the company internals are 10.n.n.n addresses ........
Steve
This caused a few scratches of heads initially as the company internals are 10.n.n.n addresses ........
Steve
Trending Topics
12 January 2003, 08:48 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We recently enabled VPN on our FW1 NG install on a Dell servers.
What a major pain that was. Ended up using network packet sniffers to see why the VPN wasn't working. To cut a long story short, we solved it by using the first network interface that Win2k enumerates as the external interface.
We use a PE2450. Onboard NIC has now become the external interface.
HTH
H
What a major pain that was. Ended up using network packet sniffers to see why the VPN wasn't working. To cut a long story short, we solved it by using the first network interface that Win2k enumerates as the external interface.
We use a PE2450. Onboard NIC has now become the external interface.
HTH
H
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM