Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

How to Increase Low Down Torque ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #1  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default How to Increase Low Down Torque ?

Folks how can i increase low down Torque on a WR1 ?

Its all great news 4K upwards but under 4K RPM its rather dead in the water...

Will a Stoker Kit sort out the problem ?

These New Age just seem to have awfull throttle response. Yep Fine if the engine is allready up in the rev range but from tick over, its a slouch.

Has anyone gained more torque low down

A Decat dosent make any difference on the WR1 as the Pro Drive sports cat is great.

any other ideas ?

Brian.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #2  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Boost controller or remap might help a little.

Stroker kit will help. 2.5 transplant probably cheaper.

Twin scroll turbo and pipework from a JDM.

2.5 will set you back about £1200-1300 plus £100 for headgaskets, allow £50 for lubricants and say £500 for labour if you find the right person to do it. Then a remap. You'll need to run a 7200 RPM limit to be sure of the internals though, don't know what the WR1 runs, but I think it will be more like 7600 RPM, so road speed will be less in each gear. See if you can get a shot in a 2.5 car to see how you think it drives and see if it is what you want. Then there is resale value, warranty and insurance to think about on what is a fairly new car.

Last edited by john banks; Oct 24, 2004 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #3  
StickyMicky's Avatar
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
From: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Default

anti lag should do it but its probably not what your after
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #4  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Sounds like a 2.5 STi JDM dosent it ? - to sort out the low down Torque..
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 06:16 PM
  #5  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

why not add a boost controller and a turbo blanket i wrapped my turbo and it lowered the limit the turbo made 1 bar at by 400rpm, which if it worked on yours would be a huge drop , plus alot cheaper than all the other things mentioned
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #6  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Brian,
You should have got yourself a JDM STi
Hows the WR1 going??

Tony
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #7  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Hi Tony..

mmm

WR1 is great apart from tha apourling throttle response at low revs.

As lively as a snail...
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #8  
stellaFella's Avatar
stellaFella
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Cool

all turbo cars suffer with low end torque problems because of the necessary low compression ratio on the engine. The best way to get more torque is a capacity increase. More cubic inches as the yanks say. God bless em!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #9  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Steve : That sounds like a well wrapped turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #10  
chris's scooby's Avatar
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Default

What's a Stoker Kit?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #11  
AndyC_772's Avatar
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Default

Sounds to me like you want a twin scroll turbo - the JDM car picks up wonderfully from low revs and that's why I bought one.

Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
chris's scooby's Avatar
chris's scooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Default

Have you got it yet, Andy?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #13  
M0NEY's Avatar
M0NEY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,005
Likes: 0
From: RIP Moneys Scoob 440bhp/470lbsft 31-07-08
Default

Brian, wouldnt put the 2.5 in a a Wr1 mate. What happens when you come to sell it?

Just get nitrous
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #14  
AndyC_772's Avatar
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Default

Should have picked it up yesterday but, although it's now registered and taxed, it's still in bits halfway through having the stereo fitted. Middle of this week now looks likely
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #15  
JIM THEO's Avatar
JIM THEO
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Default

USDM STI shortblock + gaskets + JDM STI VF37 twin scroll turbo + exhaust manifold + pan + downpipe + remap = the best of both worlds!
Litimports know the solution ah?
JIM

PS: John am I wrong or you converted your motor to 2.5lt?
I ask cause the guy that bought my MY00 asked me many times about and wants to modify it with USDM shortblock but doesn't know what parts it needs and if you can remap it!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #16  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Jim,
You want to use the VF36 which is the roller bearing turbo, slightly faster spool up over the vf37

Tony
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #17  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Yes Jim. I can't remap it for him now, having stopped because my main job was getting too busy, I'm now trying to reduce my hours in my main job. Maybe I'm just getting lazy The stuff he needs is as for any other short motor swap - gaskets, fluids, labour, remap. If increasing power, all the usual power increasing stuff - fuel system, breathing, turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #18  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

I dont think the Turbo is too blame ?? Its the Quickness the Engine revs to me by putting the Throttle pedal down.

Its just a bit slow to rev up.

OK lets put it ths way.

Trafic Lights...

WR1 in FAST lane ( second lane )
any other non turbo car in the slow lane.


Both Cars - ON TICKOVER.. TICKOVER !! IS IMPORTANT...

Lights go Amber... WR1 driver Floors the throttle and lets the clutch up slowly
The car in the slow lane does the same...............


Now this is the point where the WR1 is at its worst.... Bog Down... 2000 RPM and its not looking good.

The car in the slow lane is now about 2 cars in front....
The car in the slow lane is now 3 cars in front

WR1 hits the MAGIC 4000 RPM and we are off !!!
1st, 2nd, 3rd.. and why hey The WR1 over takes the car in the slow lane about 20 cars lenghts from the lights....


Hope that explains the problem i have

If Nitros can be injected at low revs it may be the answer... ???

if the WR1 was sitting at the Lights with tick over set to 4000 RPM .. the WR1 would have won...

Its all from Tickover folks,,, the Transformation from Tick over to Super Car, anything below 4000 RPM and it wont happen...

Ideas ??

Has Anyone else had this problem and sorted it out ???
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #19  
AndyC_772's Avatar
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Default

That's why the twin scroll turbo is so good - see from the power/torque curve just how early the 'whoosh' comes in. The whole point of the twin inlets is that energy is transferred more efficiently from the exhaust gases to the impeller, so the turbo spools up much sooner. Don't ask me to explain the physics behind this, but rest assured that it works superbly well.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #20  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Looks like we need a Private meet Andy C mate woulf like to compare mate
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #21  
AndyC_772's Avatar
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Default

A trip to Powerstation is recommended
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 09:53 PM
  #22  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by AndyC_772
A trip to Powerstation is recommended
LOL so ive heard !!...

So your ride mate .. whats been done and have you a power graph..

Really want to sort out this WR1 Problem..
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 10:01 PM
  #23  
AndyC_772's Avatar
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Default

lol Let me take delivery of the car first! It's brand new ('05 JDM STI) and I've not even got it yet...

The curve I posted is direct from Subaru's Japanese web site, showing a couple of interesting things.

1) 90% of max torque is available from about 2,500 rpm Thank the twin scroll turbo for this, although having the '05 JDM engine helps too (AVCS on both inlet & exhaust cams, bigger ports, better breathing).

2) As soon as power reaches the Japanese limit of 276 bhp, the torque starts to fall off, keeping power at precisely that level from about 4500rpm all the way to the red line. Coincidence? My ar*e. One remap later and the engine is delivering over 300bhp on Powerstation's notoriously conservative rollers with the standard exhaust.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #24  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Ok mate.. no probs.. Take Delivery and then a WR1 vs JDM Shoot out at a Rolling road and road test of your Choice ?

the 2.5 will be miles ahead of the 2.0. so its not really a fare comparrisson.

As i need to sort out a 2.0
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 12:01 AM
  #25  
*Sonic*'s Avatar
*Sonic*
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,026
Likes: 15
From: R.I.P Piphead, at least you are home now :(
Default

Just launch @ 5krpm from the lights, then you will win
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 12:22 AM
  #26  
hades's Avatar
hades
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
From: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Default

Little things like replacing the turbo inlet hose, possibly bypassing the air intake resonator in the wing, or the turbo blanket will all help a bit. A few people have reported noticeable off-boost improvements with an aftermarket TMIC as lower pressure drop there too. Can't honestly suggest they'll transform anything, or be a patch on a good twin-scroll instalation, but they will all help a bit . . .
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 07:57 AM
  #27  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by *Sonic*
Just launch @ 5krpm from the lights, then you will win
Sure does, but by the time it revs to 5000RPM and feathering the clutch to keep the power there, the person on the inside lane is long gone ;(

If i sit on a red light while reving at 5000 RPM no problem, but from tickover on amber, not a hope in hell

Its more like pulling away in second gear in a type r.. for all those type r owners to compare 1st gear with.

Try a quick launch in 2nd and youll see the problem.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 09:39 AM
  #28  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Originally Posted by AndyC_772
2) One remap later and the engine is delivering over 300bhp on Powerstation's notoriously conservative rollers with the standard exhaust.
Who needs a remap?

Andy, at the moment, my 7k miles MY03 STi is pushing 311bhp and 331lbs of torque, just with an STi Panel filter (running optimax and octane booster), your new car should breath more easily than my "old" JDM STi so id expect you to reach above 300bhp without much difficulty when she loosens up a little (she was 288bhp and 297lbs of torque with 2k on the clock though without the STi Panel filter, all figures on the same rolling road).
Just change the panel filter and fit the STi one, you will notice BIG gains, especially as it was designed for the JDM STi

Tony

PS, after fitting on the rolling road (car did 2 runs before and achieved above figures) and 2 runs after achieving 299bhp 312lbs of torque, so quite a bit of an improvement
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #29  
AndyC_772's Avatar
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Default

Quite likely - but I don't want to have to run on Optimax with or without OB.

BP has a monopoly on the garages around where I live and work, so I'll be running on BP Ultimate, like it or not. A remap means I don't have to faff about with octane booster, plus it can sort out the serious overfuelling which dleiberately occurs to sap power at high rpm.

I'll see if I can get a copy of a rolling road plot from Litchfield's demo '05 STI, that car should have loosened up a bit by now and will have the same map as mine. I'm as interested to know how it behaves as anybody
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2004 | 10:27 AM
  #30  
Brian the Sn@il's Avatar
Brian the Sn@il
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Checking the Graph on the WR1 compared to a Type R and low down Torque is the Same.
Nearly same curve, the WR1 has a steady power output when higher in the rev range compared to a Type R.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 AM.