Guess What....Another Watch Thread
#31
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Good stuff. I've got way too many, the only torch I use a lot is my sunwayman V10R titanium. But I've got loads of others, even aspheric lens'd examples that throw a perfect LED shape for hundreds of yards (dead handy haha). Mind you, I do enjoy seeing people's face when I say "oh I've got a torch you can use" and hand them my tiny ITP AAA light equipped with a 3.7v 10440 cell. Blows most people's minds what's possible.
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even my 500 lumen Fenix raises a few eyebrows but my 1800 lumen (properly tested, not some Chinese import) bike light is truly epic. I pair it with a 500 lumen lid light for proper death beam fun!
I have plenty more too...
I have plenty more too...
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I have average wrist girth but find large watches end up digging in with wrist movement and complicate frequent hand washing. Since I deal with a lot of ****, both these things are necessary. If I am not working, I am already too much of a slave to time.
#40
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just measured and my wrists are 7" on the nose. I think 51mm will be far too large. I also found a detailed review of the Hawk here which includes a picture of it on a measuring grid.
At the moment I'm probably leaning towards something like the Seiko Black Monster or the SNZF17K1 black automatic, both of which are neatly under budget.
At the moment I'm probably leaning towards something like the Seiko Black Monster or the SNZF17K1 black automatic, both of which are neatly under budget.
#42
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trigger Pulled
Reasons I chose this watch:
1. More appropriate size for my wrists
2. Screw down crown and certified 200m rating
3. Clean looking design
4. Automatic movement [matteeboy makes a good point; seem more 'right']
5. Very well reviewed online and regarded as an excellent VFM watch
Thanks to everyone that contributed
Reasons I chose this watch:
1. More appropriate size for my wrists
2. Screw down crown and certified 200m rating
3. Clean looking design
4. Automatic movement [matteeboy makes a good point; seem more 'right']
5. Very well reviewed online and regarded as an excellent VFM watch
Thanks to everyone that contributed
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good choice! I'm not very impressed with how Creation dealt with a warranty issue but if you do have an issue, send it to Seiko UK.
That's a great watch; enjoy!
That's a great watch; enjoy!
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Yeah, good choice. Mine is the Pepsi version of that, I do fancy a 007 myself.
There are a couple of online places selling the skx models over here but I'm sure they're buying them from creation anyway.
You got the right bracelet with the solid links, they do a hollow one but it's naff.
There's quite a following for the auto seiko's, and something like that (if you look after it) will not only last well, but they're future classics for certain enthusiasts.
I'm quite pleased with my latest one, the seiko 5 sport version of that watch really. No screw down crown like my skx but it's got a see through back and the hour markers are nicer.
There are a couple of online places selling the skx models over here but I'm sure they're buying them from creation anyway.
You got the right bracelet with the solid links, they do a hollow one but it's naff.
There's quite a following for the auto seiko's, and something like that (if you look after it) will not only last well, but they're future classics for certain enthusiasts.
I'm quite pleased with my latest one, the seiko 5 sport version of that watch really. No screw down crown like my skx but it's got a see through back and the hour markers are nicer.
#45
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was really torn between the 007 and the cheaper 5 sport. I really liked the idea of the glass back but I figured I'd look at it a few times then never bother to look again. The swinging point was that the sport isn't a true divers watch. The 007 feels like a more authentic timepiece; designed with a purpose in mind and fit for that purpose. They Sport felt a bit more like something you'd buy window shopping in the high street because it looks nice at a reasonable price.
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine is a 200m Seiko 5 (same movement as yours Saxo) but not an official diver; it does feel very solid though: probably a sort of halfway house between the two.
#47
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
The case is much nicer on the one you've bought compared to the 5's. You'll love it I'm sure. It's got a great look and feel to the sides of it. Like you say, the 5 case looks like every cheaper watch I've had, but the one you've bought has a real nice look to the sides. They've got a good feel about them for the money & the auto & the second hand movement is cool.
Only reason I got the 5 sport one too was I found one very cheap (nearly new) Saying that though it's still a great watch for the money, very cheap on creation and much better on the wrist than in pics.
Only reason I got the 5 sport one too was I found one very cheap (nearly new) Saying that though it's still a great watch for the money, very cheap on creation and much better on the wrist than in pics.
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The case is much nicer on the one you've bought compared to the 5's. You'll love it I'm sure. It's got a great look and feel to the sides of it. Like you say, the 5 case looks like every cheaper watch I've had, but the one you've bought has a real nice look to the sides. They've got a good feel about them for the money & the auto & the second hand movement is cool.
Only reason I got the 5 sport one too was I found one very cheap (nearly new) Saying that though it's still a great watch for the money, very cheap on creation and much better on the wrist than in pics.
Only reason I got the 5 sport one too was I found one very cheap (nearly new) Saying that though it's still a great watch for the money, very cheap on creation and much better on the wrist than in pics.
http://www.creationwatches.com/produ...z211-3810.html
I went for the fully Jap J version instead of the non Jap K version.
I'd buy another (from somwhere else) without hesitation - some of the Grand Seikos are lovely and IMO have superior movements to pretty much any watch in the World but they ain't cheap!
#49
Trigger Pulled
Reasons I chose this watch:
1. More appropriate size for my wrists
2. Screw down crown and certified 200m rating
3. Clean looking design
4. Automatic movement [matteeboy makes a good point; seem more 'right']
5. Very well reviewed online and regarded as an excellent VFM watch
Thanks to everyone that contributed
Reasons I chose this watch:
1. More appropriate size for my wrists
2. Screw down crown and certified 200m rating
3. Clean looking design
4. Automatic movement [matteeboy makes a good point; seem more 'right']
5. Very well reviewed online and regarded as an excellent VFM watch
Thanks to everyone that contributed
#51
#52
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Staffordshire, Midlands
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know nothing about watches but the Casio Ediface range looks visually stunning
Quite fancy one of the radio controlled solar powered ones.
Scott
Quite fancy one of the radio controlled solar powered ones.
Scott
#54
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I found amusing at the weekend was this Casio was something stupid like £45 in John Lewis. I remember when it was £9.99 from Argos in the 80s. How does that work then? It must cost literally 5p to manufacture these days
#55
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Edifice ones do look very good but for some reason, are only 100m waterproof.
Now I have the Seiko, I tend to only wear the G Shocks surfing (I have four in total).
Recently got this as a spare; the missus now wears it all the time - £8 delivered!!
Last edited by Matteeboy; 03 October 2013 at 09:42 AM.
#56
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Trigger Pulled
Reasons I chose this watch:
1. More appropriate size for my wrists
2. Screw down crown and certified 200m rating
3. Clean looking design
4. Automatic movement [matteeboy makes a good point; seem more 'right']
5. Very well reviewed online and regarded as an excellent VFM watch
Thanks to everyone that contributed
Reasons I chose this watch:
1. More appropriate size for my wrists
2. Screw down crown and certified 200m rating
3. Clean looking design
4. Automatic movement [matteeboy makes a good point; seem more 'right']
5. Very well reviewed online and regarded as an excellent VFM watch
Thanks to everyone that contributed
#59
Nice choice.
I keep sizing up Orient Mako auto.Really good reviews.About £100 and think Seiko own them
Look similar to one you bought (and my longines hydro)
I keep sizing up Orient Mako auto.Really good reviews.About £100 and think Seiko own them
Look similar to one you bought (and my longines hydro)
#60