Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

how much can a standard 2.5 take

Old Feb 28, 2013 | 07:07 PM
  #61  
jazzyjembreaze's Avatar
jazzyjembreaze
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle upon tyne
Default

^
Many facts
& it's quite a technical answer / basically it's down to
Size , diam , flow rate , spool , pressure etc etc
Do an Internet search on tubular gains & disadvantage
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 07:19 PM
  #62  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jazzyjembreaze
^
400 or below
Ported oem headers 2 bolt Harvey tric up - pipe
Is whats required on a 2.5 sti running a standard VF 43
I achieved 387 bhp & 420 ftlbs on ecutek
Mapped by Bob Rawle


Above 400
You want tubular headers & 3 bolt Harvey tric up -pipe
Turbo choice is yours to choose
Sc46 or MD321V billet is my choice
Was that with a de-cat?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #63  
jazzyjembreaze's Avatar
jazzyjembreaze
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle upon tyne
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
Was that with a de-cat?
Yes , although a little mis- leading I was merely adding what can be archived from a VF43 on a well built engine
Yes full decat
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 08:11 PM
  #64  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jazzyjembreaze
Yes , although a little mis- leading I was merely adding what can be archived from a VF43 on a well built engine
Yes full decat
Yeah, i think a sport cat can deduct about 10-20 bhp from that figure. I remember Bob Rawle telling me you can get about 390 odd on v-power with a vf43. I only got 362 @1.6 bar but i am running a sport cat and my engine had only done about 1000 miles since the build. I think my figure will come up once it has a few more thousand miles on it as i made 359 before the forged build at 1.4 bar. Not too bothered to be honest as i find it a very quick road car. My next step will be something like an sc42 and map to about 420 bhp. I think that will be perfect in a newage as a road car.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 08:29 PM
  #65  
Flaps's Avatar
Flaps
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
There used to be a saying when people said uninformed things, "you watch too much tv". I think the modern version is "you read to many internet opinions"

Many always say the 2.5 is made of chocolate ect but they have never owned or driven one. Their comments come from things they have read from anonymous forum posters. You can tell because they just come out with off the cuff comments rather than informed fact and detail.
There are two types of 2.5 impreza engine, the ej255 wrx and the sti ej257. The wrx is not known for many problems and i believe 350bhp is fine but it does have the weaker 5 speed box.
The early sti 2.5 2006 had the earlier head gasket which was revised in the 2007 engines. the 2008 on had ringland issues which prompted subaru to revise the map which seemed to solve the problem on standard cars.
The ppp map to 316 bhp was said to be 10% below the engines limit on standard internals. There are many 2.5 cars that have achieved high trouble free mileage but like most cars if you read forums there will be reports of failures. Personally i would not go above 360bhp unless you have forged pistons and 11mm head studs as a minimum.
Internet forums are much like the press in general. You only read horror storys.
That's the most sensible post i've read on here in a LONG time!
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 08:55 PM
  #66  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by jazzyjembreaze
^
Many facts
& it's quite a technical answer / basically it's down to
Size , diam , flow rate , spool , pressure etc etc
Do an Internet search on tubular gains & disadvantage
I think I know why im gtting abit lag than I expected, think its my tubular headers :|, I knew I should have just gone for ported oem...
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 08:57 PM
  #67  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps
That's the most sensible post i've read on here in a LONG time!

I think we need stickies of posts like these, well I informative and detailed, this way people would understand more about engines and the capabilities
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:05 PM
  #68  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by veerinder9
I think I know why im gtting abit lag than I expected, think its my tubular headers :|, I knew I should have just gone for ported oem...
Are you still using the Top mount intercooler or have you gone front mount? I believe on some set ups a front mount while giving potential for high bhp can also cause more lag that the tmic.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:12 PM
  #69  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
Are you still using the Top mount intercooler or have you gone front mount? I believe on some set ups a front mount while giving potential for high bhp can also cause more lag that the tmic.
Im on top mount, ive watched my gauge and the boost reads at 0 psi at 3k rpm, gets to 20ish psi not sure what rpm cz im too busy looking on the road lol
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:21 PM
  #70  
jazzyjembreaze's Avatar
jazzyjembreaze
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle upon tyne
Default

If you are suffering noticable lag
It is more likely to be the headers if you are running under requirements
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:21 PM
  #71  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by veerinder9
Im on top mount, ive watched my gauge and the boost reads at 0 psi at 3k rpm, gets to 20ish psi not sure what rpm cz im too busy looking on the road lol
With boost it's more the maner in which you rev rather than the rev if that makes any sense. You can drive at like 130mph off boost if you just let the engine slowly pull it. Im probably making full boost by about 3500rpm if im pressing on.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:23 PM
  #72  
jazzyjembreaze's Avatar
jazzyjembreaze
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle upon tyne
Default

I take it you did a search for the explainative from gains to disadvantage
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:27 PM
  #73  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
With boost it's more the maner in which you rev rather than the rev if that makes any sense. You can drive at like 130mph off boost if you just let the engine slowly pull it. Im probably making full boost by about 3500rpm if im pressing on.
Ohh! I get what you mean, il have to someone to watch them for me wgile I boot it, better way as I dont really floor it to the metal while watching them.. Scary.. Lol
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:31 PM
  #74  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by jazzyjembreaze
I take it you did a search for the explainative from gains to disadvantage
Yes I did , ported oem would have been better as tubular header diam are larger and flow rate is slower, but im thinking if I stick with the headers n uppipe and go for the sc38 which will work better with the tubular headers as its a 380 turbo, and go fmic
I will be changing short motor to a 2.0 forged closed deck block..
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:39 PM
  #75  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by veerinder9
Yes I did , ported oem would have been better as tubular header diam are larger and flow rate is slower, but im thinking if I stick with the headers n uppipe and go for the sc38 which will work better with the tubular headers as its a 380 turbo, and go fmic
I will be changing short motor to a 2.0 forged closed deck block..
But it will be laggier which is what you were trying to get away from.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:53 PM
  #76  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by veerinder9
Ohh! I get what you mean, il have to someone to watch them for me wgile I boot it, better way as I dont really floor it to the metal while watching them.. Scary.. Lol
I know exactly what you mean. Try live mapping. "right, now hold 1 bar,,, now floor it" watching the guage while holding a level of boost and keeping an eye on the traffic. scares me every time
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:55 PM
  #77  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
But it will be laggier which is what you were trying to get away from.
Wouldnt the sc38 spool up quicker though?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 09:56 PM
  #78  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
I know exactly what you mean. Try live mapping. "right, now hold 1 bar,,, now floor it" watching the guage while holding a level of boost and keeping an eye on the traffic. scares me every time
Mine was live mapped by the main man JGM himself, what an experience though, my words, "think I just **** myself" haha
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 10:10 PM
  #79  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by veerinder9
Wouldnt the sc38 spool up quicker though?
no... its a larger turbo, and even with billet wheel I wouldnt expect it to spool sooner than the td05 16g you have on there especially with a fmic to fill.

for the spec you have its a rapid car.. I thihk you just need to alter your driving style.

Simon
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2013 | 10:15 PM
  #80  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
no... its a larger turbo, and even with billet wheel I wouldnt expect it to spool sooner than the td05 16g you have on there especially with a fmic to fill.

for the spec you have its a rapid car.. I thihk you just need to alter your driving style.

Simon
Hmm I guess your right, im not really used to downshifting, eould you recommend a sc36? Would you say its better than the td05?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 09:05 AM
  #81  
legacy_gtb's Avatar
legacy_gtb
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
Default

----

Last edited by legacy_gtb; Mar 1, 2013 at 09:08 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #82  
veerinder9's Avatar
veerinder9
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
From: wolverhampton
Default

Originally Posted by legacy_gtb
----
Would heat wrapping them improve the spool? Headers are by william motorsport
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 11:16 PM
  #83  
wrbhawk's Avatar
wrbhawk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Default

What's a safe boost to run on the hawk WRX with a VF43?
I'd be happy if with anything between 320-330 as long as it's safe.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 07:58 PM
  #84  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
2.5?
What was the failure?

forgot to post back, piston failed and driver carried on driving, mashed one of the heads, block and shelled out the turbo. So was not alot reused lol
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 08:11 PM
  #85  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Ouch!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 08:37 PM
  #86  
Pez's Avatar
Pez
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
Yeah, i think a sport cat can deduct about 10-20 bhp from that figure. I remember Bob Rawle telling me you can get about 390 odd on v-power with a vf43. I only got 362 @1.6 bar but i am running a sport cat and my engine had only done about 1000 miles since the build. I think my figure will come up once it has a few more thousand miles on it as i made 359 before the forged build at 1.4 bar. Not too bothered to be honest as i find it a very quick road car. My next step will be something like an sc42 and map to about 420 bhp. I think that will be perfect in a newage as a road car.
Bob mapped my car and it's now running 396 on just v-power, using miltek headers, hayward and scott uppipe and full miltek de-catted exhaust, plus hyperflow front mount.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 10:28 PM
  #87  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
Ouch!
one way to put it lol, ah well, forged 2.5 now, 120 miles down, 380 to go till partial map lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
Tarling
Subaru Parts
10
Oct 19, 2015 07:58 PM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
2
Oct 2, 2015 05:34 PM
sedge69
Wanted
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:44 PM
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
Sep 29, 2015 02:18 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:17 PM.