Thanks to Simon @ jgm
#31
I'm quite surprised that your car managed 400ft on the VF36, really a great result. I know the Grp N cars managed over 400ft, but that's with a restrictor, which I understand improves torque at the cost of power.
What sort of boost are you running?
Is this on standard V-Power?
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Thats why i said it, I know what mine sounded like up the revs and with a Blitz well.......
There have been a few spec-c`s that have hit 400lbft on the VF36, Talk to Bob Rawle about it
Do you have a graph for the results?
I'm quite surprised that your car managed 400ft on the VF36, really a great result. I know the Grp N cars managed over 400ft, but that's with a restrictor, which I understand improves torque at the cost of power.
What sort of boost are you running?
Is this on standard V-Power?
I'm quite surprised that your car managed 400ft on the VF36, really a great result. I know the Grp N cars managed over 400ft, but that's with a restrictor, which I understand improves torque at the cost of power.
What sort of boost are you running?
Is this on standard V-Power?
#34
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
400lbft isnt usually an issue.. but sometimes it hampers the power as the turbo is so hot by the time it gets to higher rpm.. this one no problem.
Simon
Simon
#35
interesting. Mine is currently producing 340 lb ft on the VF36 (with a milltek 3" with 100 cell sports cat.)
So there should still be plenty of torque to be gained from it then?
It's running 345lb ft, which is probably about as much as I can expect with the cat in there. Still, another 60lb ft would be nice!
So there should still be plenty of torque to be gained from it then?
It's running 345lb ft, which is probably about as much as I can expect with the cat in there. Still, another 60lb ft would be nice!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post