Newcastle Utd breaking (sharia) law
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
You know that only too well!
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 15
From: To the valley men!
Part of the tradition was the whole family would pool money to buy property.
So everyone would put in to buy the first son a house, then the second etc, each eventually gettign their money back (I think this is the way it worked). Daughters are married off to the sons who have got this sort of support.
It's fairly medevial in approach but it does mean that islamic families are generally a lot closer than most.
5t.
So everyone would put in to buy the first son a house, then the second etc, each eventually gettign their money back (I think this is the way it worked). Daughters are married off to the sons who have got this sort of support.
It's fairly medevial in approach but it does mean that islamic families are generally a lot closer than most.
5t.
Yes but naturally you can see that if concessions are given in the UK to an Islam-based concern, then it might be perceived as one step along the path of Islamification of the UK and the introduction of Sharia law on a wider scale by the back door. And i think most British people would not wish to see that.
Yes but naturally you can see that if concessions are given in the UK to an Islam-based concern, then it might be perceived as one step along the path of Islamification of the UK and the introduction of Sharia law on a wider scale by the back door. And i think most British people would not wish to see that.
OK I'm prepared to make that statement over and over if you like, because it WILL NEVER HAPPEN. Anyone who suggests it will usually has an agenda
Well yes, you can see the inroads that Sikh law has made into British criminal law (sikh courts have existed for decades) as well as Jewish civil courts (which have existed for centuries).,
Oh...no...wait..no you can't.
It really is amusing to see the weak minded be utterly compelled by the Mail etc in the face of no evidence whatsoever.
Sharia law is not, has not and will not overule Criminal law in this country. If you beleive otherwise you are a simple minded buffoon.
Oh...no...wait..no you can't.
It really is amusing to see the weak minded be utterly compelled by the Mail etc in the face of no evidence whatsoever.
Sharia law is not, has not and will not overule Criminal law in this country. If you beleive otherwise you are a simple minded buffoon.
does this mean that muslims can't wear branded clothing ? as most companies lend the manufactor of thier branded goods, money or equipment in order to produce goods in countries that could never afford the machinery, and they do charge for the loans,
Not much point as
A) Tel answered it for me (the hypothetical question)
B) I don't appreciate the patronising/condescending manner of your above quote
C) Because of point B above, I think you're a bit of a **** tbh
D) There's your answer
A) Tel answered it for me (the hypothetical question)
B) I don't appreciate the patronising/condescending manner of your above quote
C) Because of point B above, I think you're a bit of a **** tbh
D) There's your answer
b. Well if you pose a question, expect that some people are going to want to understand from the horses mouth, why it was posed
c. I'll not stoop to your level - I'll leave that one hanging

d. Because of A you haven't answered it
At this point your usual trick will be to call me names, and insinuate that I have some sympathy with child murderers
a. Well you still haven't told me what the point of your 'hypothetical question' was. Tel didn't actually answer it
b. Well if you pose a question, expect that some people are going to want to understand from the horses mouth, why it was posed
c. I'll not stoop to your level - I'll leave that one hanging
d. Because of A you haven't answered it
At this point your usual trick will be to call me names, and insinuate that I have some sympathy with child murderers
b. Well if you pose a question, expect that some people are going to want to understand from the horses mouth, why it was posed
c. I'll not stoop to your level - I'll leave that one hanging

d. Because of A you haven't answered it
At this point your usual trick will be to call me names, and insinuate that I have some sympathy with child murderers

Martin i think it's fair to say that on the balance of probability, given the way Christianity is embedded within our legal framework, that its expulsion in favour of Sharia Law is at best, negligible. Lots of people don't really understand how embedded it is, and i can feel you just waiting to pounce on anybody who doesn't understand the mechanics as well as you obviously do. But i'd still contest that "never" is a massive word to use, even for a constitution as old as the UK's. And that's what this story is about, just making people nervous - rightly or wrongly - that a little bit here, a little bit there, and all of a sudden it's a different set of rules we're playing by. That's the general gist i think.
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!






