Spec C - LM400 Billet?
Can you use an aftermarket TMIC?
My 2.1 using an Owen Developments Twin Scroll has 460BHP/470Lbft with the same spool as a VF37 on a Chevron Motorsport TMIC, currently mapped at 1.75BAR.
There is no need to go FMIC if you can afford a top quality TMIC, even over 500BHP
My 2.1 using an Owen Developments Twin Scroll has 460BHP/470Lbft with the same spool as a VF37 on a Chevron Motorsport TMIC, currently mapped at 1.75BAR.
There is no need to go FMIC if you can afford a top quality TMIC, even over 500BHP
Last edited by johnfelstead; Oct 1, 2012 at 07:57 PM.
Thanks for the input guys, much appreciated.
Unfortunately I need to keep the standard TMIC as everything needs to look standard to pass a visual inspection (turbo should be ok since most of it is hidden behind the heat sheild...)
Unfortunately I need to keep the standard TMIC as everything needs to look standard to pass a visual inspection (turbo should be ok since most of it is hidden behind the heat sheild...)
Could you not swap the TMIC between inspections? Unlike a FMIC it's a 10 minute job to swap out and involves no changes to the car at all. I doubt anyone without good knowledge would notice the difference anyway.
Not sure on current retail cost of the top spec Item. They do 2 versions.
The top spec version uses a core material that is used by current F1 teams to make their heat exchangers from, it is UK manufactured. You will not find a more eficient core material, which is hand made so expensive to produce.
The top spec version uses a core material that is used by current F1 teams to make their heat exchangers from, it is UK manufactured. You will not find a more eficient core material, which is hand made so expensive to produce.
Did you run the same turbo on the stock 2.0L, if so, how much earlier was the spool with the 2.1L?
I cannot change the top mount either. I must keep it on the standard TMIC. I can make some modifications to the airbox to reduce the restriction there, that's about it.
Fortunately, I have the auto mode for the intercooler, which should help keep the temps down.
Fortunately, I have the auto mode for the intercooler, which should help keep the temps down.
Personally I'd stick with the LM400 then.
I had already gone 2.1 by the time i got round to doing the turbo with Owen Devs, but did a back to back with my VF37 on the 2.1 and the spool is identical to that. https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=81
Plenty of info in the thread above.
I didnt find much improvement on spool going 2.1 over the 2.0 with the VF37, peak torque came in 200rpm earlier but it also ran out of puff sooner so top end power hardly changed. It gained approx 1.6% power, 7.5% torque.
Owen can do different specs of turbo, Paulo Spec C is running a slightly smaller version of mine on a stock 2.0l spec C engine, seemed to go quite well at the last MLR Sprint.
Last edited by johnfelstead; Oct 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM.
My 2.1 uses the 2.5 crank, manley rods (same length as stock) and Mahle 92.5mm bore 2618 pistons.
I had already gone 2.1 by the time i got round to doing the turbo with Owen Devs, but did a back to back with my VF37 on the 2.1 and the spool is identical to that. https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=81
Plenty of info in the thread above.
I didnt find much improvement on spool going 2.1 over the 2.0 with the VF37, peak torque came in 200rpm earlier but it also ran out of puff sooner so top end power hardly changed. It gained approx 1.6% power, 7.5% torque.
I had already gone 2.1 by the time i got round to doing the turbo with Owen Devs, but did a back to back with my VF37 on the 2.1 and the spool is identical to that. https://www.scoobynet.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=81
Plenty of info in the thread above.
I didnt find much improvement on spool going 2.1 over the 2.0 with the VF37, peak torque came in 200rpm earlier but it also ran out of puff sooner so top end power hardly changed. It gained approx 1.6% power, 7.5% torque.

Just realised the bore and stroke of yours is exactly the same as some if not all 2.2L stroker kits.
If there wasn't much change in spool or power, what is the main benefit in your opinion would the 2.1 or some call it 2.2 be compared to the 2.0? The average gain in torque?
The advantage in the 2.1 stroker, Suberman - is the torque. It also then gives you more choice of turbos and better spool when it comes to upgrading to bigger turbos.
Maybe a stupid question: but on a JDM Sti we have the nitrided crank, but when we go to a 2.1 stroker and use a 2.5 crank, that is not nitrided??
Maybe a stupid question: but on a JDM Sti we have the nitrided crank, but when we go to a 2.1 stroker and use a 2.5 crank, that is not nitrided??
Last edited by rickya; Oct 4, 2012 at 02:08 PM.
The advantage in the 2.1 stroker, Suberman - is the torque. It also then gives you more choice of turbos and better spool when it comes to upgrading to bigger turbos.
Maybe a stupid question: but on a JDM Sti we have the nitrided crank, but when we go to a 2.1 stroker and use a 2.5 crank, that is not nitrided??
Maybe a stupid question: but on a JDM Sti we have the nitrided crank, but when we go to a 2.1 stroker and use a 2.5 crank, that is not nitrided??
https://www.scoobynet.com/car-parts-for-sale-437/936858-subaru-nitrided-crankshafts-with-s-n-discount.html
I put a £180 front mount on as i cant afford the parts that i would like and have to go for what i can afford i had a standard top mount on the road was fine,But the track caused serious heat soak.
Tight and dumb as fck are worlds apart now when i was 20 i would spend 40k on a car worth 12k but hey im far to exsperienced now just like you, But i learnt and you didnt that's the difference between me and you.
Oh and i can drive and you cant for ****
Night x
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
Wanted
17
Oct 5, 2015 07:19 PM








