The 2011-2012 Liverpool FC Thread.
27 December 2011, 04:02 PM
#91
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: north of the south border
Posts: 4,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oooooh, all handbags at ten paces again I see?
Chris, FM, kiss and make up.
Addi Monster - you've made yourself look a proper **** with that racist led outburst and yes it was me who rtm'd you. Handbags as above is a part of sport but you vile tripe is not welcome. I'll be polite and request you do not do it again or simply get lost from the sport section.
Now... where were we?
Oh yes, joint top
Chris, FM, kiss and make up.
Addi Monster - you've made yourself look a proper **** with that racist led outburst and yes it was me who rtm'd you. Handbags as above is a part of sport but you vile tripe is not welcome. I'll be polite and request you do not do it again or simply get lost from the sport section.
Now... where were we?
Oh yes, joint top
29 December 2011, 10:19 PM
#92
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
like i already said choco i fully understand my actions, it just shows how drinking and posting on here is not a wise move, anyhow for the genuine fans , i reckon we will be buying a striker in january as suarez will be banned for sure and carrol just isnt cutting it yet so who would you like to see at anfield and who do you reckon we will end up with,.
Torres.
Yes i have been drinking.
31 December 2011, 06:55 PM
#95
http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplin...uarez-20-12-11
Worth a read.
The FA's case, in short, was as follows. In the goalmouth, Mr Evra and Mr Suarez spoke to
each other in Spanish. Mr Evra asked Mr Suarez why he had kicked him, referring to the
foul five minutes previously. Mr Suarez replied "Porque tu eres negro", meaning "Because
you are black". Mr Evra then said to Mr Suarez “say it to me again, I’m going to punch
you”. Mr Suarez replied "No hablo con los negros", meaning "I don't speak to blacks". Mr
Evra continued by saying that he now thought he was going to punch Mr Suarez. Mr
Suarez replied "Dale, negro, negro, negro", which meant "okay, blackie, blackie, blackie".
As Mr Suarez said this, he reached out to touch Mr Evra's arm, gesturing at his skin. Mr
Kuyt then intervened. When the referee blew his whistle and called the players over to
him shortly after the exchanges in the goalmouth, Mr Evra said to the referee "ref, ref, he
just called me a ****ing black".
Worth a read.
The FA's case, in short, was as follows. In the goalmouth, Mr Evra and Mr Suarez spoke to
each other in Spanish. Mr Evra asked Mr Suarez why he had kicked him, referring to the
foul five minutes previously. Mr Suarez replied "Porque tu eres negro", meaning "Because
you are black". Mr Evra then said to Mr Suarez “say it to me again, I’m going to punch
you”. Mr Suarez replied "No hablo con los negros", meaning "I don't speak to blacks". Mr
Evra continued by saying that he now thought he was going to punch Mr Suarez. Mr
Suarez replied "Dale, negro, negro, negro", which meant "okay, blackie, blackie, blackie".
As Mr Suarez said this, he reached out to touch Mr Evra's arm, gesturing at his skin. Mr
Kuyt then intervened. When the referee blew his whistle and called the players over to
him shortly after the exchanges in the goalmouth, Mr Evra said to the referee "ref, ref, he
just called me a ****ing black".
Last edited by richie001; 31 December 2011 at 06:57 PM.
02 January 2012, 01:10 AM
#96
Evras version ...
Suarez reckons differently
uarez Case: Mr Suarez denied the Charge. His case, in short, was as follows. He agreed with Mr Evra that they spoke to each other in Spanish in the goalmouth. When Mr Evra asked why he had kicked him, Mr Suarez replied that it was a normal foul and shrugged his shoulders. Mr Evra then said that he was going to kick Mr Suarez, to which Mr Suarez told him to shut up. As Mr Kuyt was approaching, Mr Suarez touched Mr Evra's left arm in a pinching style movement. According to Mr Suarez, at no point in the goalmouth did he
use the word "negro". When the referee blew his whistle to stop play, Mr Evra spoke to Mr Suarez and said (in English) "Don't touch me, South American". Mr Suarez replied "Por que, negro?". He says that he used the word “negro” in a way with which he was familiar from his upbringing in Uruguay. In this sense, Mr Suarez claimed, it is used as a noun and as a friendly form of address to people seen as black or brown-skinned (or even just blackhaired). Thus, it meant "Why, black?" Mr Suarez maintained that when he said "Por que,
negro?" to Mr Evra, it was intended in a conciliatory and friendly way. Mr Suarez said this 6 was the only time that he used the word “negro” in his exchanges with Mr Evra during the match.
One word against the other
Could go on for a while!
Suarez reckons differently
uarez Case: Mr Suarez denied the Charge. His case, in short, was as follows. He agreed with Mr Evra that they spoke to each other in Spanish in the goalmouth. When Mr Evra asked why he had kicked him, Mr Suarez replied that it was a normal foul and shrugged his shoulders. Mr Evra then said that he was going to kick Mr Suarez, to which Mr Suarez told him to shut up. As Mr Kuyt was approaching, Mr Suarez touched Mr Evra's left arm in a pinching style movement. According to Mr Suarez, at no point in the goalmouth did he
use the word "negro". When the referee blew his whistle to stop play, Mr Evra spoke to Mr Suarez and said (in English) "Don't touch me, South American". Mr Suarez replied "Por que, negro?". He says that he used the word “negro” in a way with which he was familiar from his upbringing in Uruguay. In this sense, Mr Suarez claimed, it is used as a noun and as a friendly form of address to people seen as black or brown-skinned (or even just blackhaired). Thus, it meant "Why, black?" Mr Suarez maintained that when he said "Por que,
negro?" to Mr Evra, it was intended in a conciliatory and friendly way. Mr Suarez said this 6 was the only time that he used the word “negro” in his exchanges with Mr Evra during the match.
One word against the other
Could go on for a while!
02 January 2012, 09:06 AM
#97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although the FA found against Suarez as much because his testimony did not seem as reliable as Evra.
Evra seemed more credible and more consistent with associated video footage - some of which we have not seen.
Suarez's testimony was inconsistent with itself and with video footage.
So one word against the other comes to credibility of witness, and one witness seems more reliable than the other.
Evra seemed more credible and more consistent with associated video footage - some of which we have not seen.
Suarez's testimony was inconsistent with itself and with video footage.
So one word against the other comes to credibility of witness, and one witness seems more reliable than the other.
03 January 2012, 01:11 PM
#102
Pontificating
same old same old 
03 January 2012, 01:15 PM
#103
Pontificating
03 January 2012, 01:19 PM
#105
Pontificating
like i already said choco i fully understand my actions, it just shows how drinking and posting on here is not a wise move, anyhow for the genuine fans , i reckon we will be buying a striker in january as suarez will be banned for sure and carrol just isnt cutting it yet so who would you like to see at anfield and who do you reckon we will end up with,.
Do me favour
03 January 2012, 07:54 PM
#109
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: north of the south border
Posts: 4,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
munkii **** off,,,,
SUAREZ & liverpool have acepted the ban so no suarez for 8 games,,,,
liverpool vs man city ??? 2-1 to liverpool or am i mad,,.
SUAREZ & liverpool have acepted the ban so no suarez for 8 games,,,,
liverpool vs man city ??? 2-1 to liverpool or am i mad,,.
03 January 2012, 09:41 PM
#111
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not good tonight.
Poor keeping for the 1st. Poor defending for 2nd.
We need a cutting edge, Suarez dropping deep feeding Torres maybe? Over heard Colin Murray on MOTD2 saying he's 4-1 to return to Anfield on loan?!
Poor keeping for the 1st. Poor defending for 2nd.
We need a cutting edge, Suarez dropping deep feeding Torres maybe? Over heard Colin Murray on MOTD2 saying he's 4-1 to return to Anfield on loan?!
04 January 2012, 06:44 PM
#115
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Playing wise we're on a different planet. This was never going to be a 1 year project. We've still got a long way to go. But we're getting there.
As you asked.
05 January 2012, 11:05 AM
#117
Pontificating
05 January 2012, 11:20 AM
#118
Pontificating
2006 - 2 viewers watching Sky Sports thought they could lip read Steve Finnan being racist towards Evra and reported it to the FA, not Evra
2008 - Chelsea reported Evra to the FA, Evra never reported the groundsman, after being reported he then advised he had been abused.
Although your last statement is technically correct, he is a ****** ! a niggly wind up merchant. I'd save Prize ****** for the likes of Barton, Bellamy and Suarez
05 January 2012, 11:32 AM
#119
Pontificating
Any coincedence that Suarez make a half arsed apology this morning hours after the media turn against LFC for their embarassing stance on this whole sorry affair.......
If only he'd done this from day one.
05 January 2012, 11:44 AM
#120
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: north of the south border
Posts: 4,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bellamy seams to have calmed down a hell of a lot tbh.. barton is a ***.. suarez for me is like roony a bit too fired up at times but thats what makes them great footballers inho..