Nine More scumbags arrested for the grooming of young girls for sex
It's in the Guardian a left wing rag FFS and it quote figures which come from a 3rd party. You are free to verify them yourself.
The article was trying to dismantle the 'prejudice' that asians are overrepresented in sex gangs but had to conclude this was difficult given the evidence.
The article was trying to dismantle the 'prejudice' that asians are overrepresented in sex gangs but had to conclude this was difficult given the evidence.
When You're proven wrong you always seem to use the "its not me its papers i read, im innocent" excuse.
I think its you that is shocking and sick. Its shocking that you could stoop so low and accuse another person of being sick, its sick putting words into their mouth which they have not said and twisting it to suit your own agenda.
Bottom line is sick acts such as this don't have a colour, race or religion. Man/woman consists of a basic nature and their thinking process and ability to take something on board to turn it into an act is down to every individual to ensure they are a good embassador of their community/region/etc. It's that ability in question here and that has no colour as I stated earlier.
I agreeAdam, sorry mate but you are smacking of double standards with your comment. You seem to be saying colour/religion is not relevant in the current topic of this thread. Yet you say a woman, being dressed for summer, usually scantily (which is our choice) is asking for trouble.
What those people did was terrible, and they needed to feel the full force of the law, no matter what religion/colour or nationality they are. Same as anyone who thinks how a woman dresses is an excuse for a person thinking they can take advantage. All the same thing to me.
Bottom line is sick acts such as this don't have a colour, race or religion. Man/woman consists of a basic nature and their thinking process and ability to take something on board to turn it into an act is down to every individual to ensure they are a good embassador of their community/region/etc. It's that ability in question here and that has no colour as I stated earlier.
in summer mainly naked women walking the streets, its like showing a starving lion food and saying you can't have it!!!!! Its part of ones innate nature to eat.
Even to me, and I rarely agree with tony, at all, but I thought it came across like almost saying women are 'asking for it'. I don't think it was a case of putting words in to somebody's mouth to be honest.
Just because a woman might wear less than some people may think she should, doesn't make her fair game and open to abuse. There are plenty of women who wear little, particularly in good weather (men also often reduce the amount of clothes worn), there are also plenty of men that may well eye them up, but not decide to rape them.
To be fair here, this is what adam said:
in summer mainly naked women walking the streets, its like showing a starving lion food and saying you can't have it!!!!! Its part of ones innate nature to eat.
Even to me, and I rarely agree with tony, at all, but I thought it came across like almost saying women are 'asking for it'. I don't think it was a case of putting words in to somebody's mouth to be honest.
Just because a woman might wear less than some people may think she should, doesn't make her fair game and open to abuse. There are plenty of women who wear little, particularly in good weather (men also often reduce the amount of clothes worn), there are also plenty of men that may well eye them up, but not decide to rape them.
in summer mainly naked women walking the streets, its like showing a starving lion food and saying you can't have it!!!!! Its part of ones innate nature to eat.
Even to me, and I rarely agree with tony, at all, but I thought it came across like almost saying women are 'asking for it'. I don't think it was a case of putting words in to somebody's mouth to be honest.
Just because a woman might wear less than some people may think she should, doesn't make her fair game and open to abuse. There are plenty of women who wear little, particularly in good weather (men also often reduce the amount of clothes worn), there are also plenty of men that may well eye them up, but not decide to rape them.
I agreeAdam, sorry mate but you are smacking of double standards with your comment. You seem to be saying colour/religion is not relevant in the current topic of this thread. Yet you say a woman, being dressed for summer, usually scantily (which is our choice) is asking for trouble.
What those people did was terrible, and they needed to feel the full force of the law, no matter what religion/colour or nationality they are. Same as anyone who thinks how a woman dresses is an excuse for a person thinking they can take advantage. All the same thing to me.
If you look at any action, there is a root to where the action stems from. A problem cannot be solved unless the root is understood. You are missing my point fella, this was not an attact on how women choose to dress or not dress in this case, it's an example i.e man and women have needs and wants and going on from that there is a way in order to fulfill them, either respectfully (marriage, partner) or otherwise. Media has sexualised everything even selling a toothbrush.
Man is exploiting women whether you agree or not that's down to you. Its this exploitation which generates revenue. So as long as it generates revenue it makes it ok does it? Which in turn makes women feel they have to conform to norms which have been laid out by the "elite" which has its mind on its money and its money on its mind. It sounds like me and you have different levels of values. My values are laid out by the one who created me. I didn't have a go at how women chose to dress, its their money and their wardrobe. I did not state its an excuse for any immoral act these are your words, i gave a cause and effect "scenario", didn't give an excuse for such a low down act.
Why was it not normal for women to dress like they do now 30-40 years ago?
IMO its a steady morale decline and there are many factors which have contributed to this.
Last edited by adam405sti; Jun 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM.
This has everything to do with race and colour, they would never do it to their own "community" they prey on non-asian girl due to having very little respect for them. But their actions will result in a reaction and that will end up with the far right jumping on the band wagon.
I agree they need to feel the full force of the law.
If you look at any action, there is a root to where the action stems from. A problem cannot be solved unless the root is understood. You are missing my point fella, this was not an attact on how women choose to dress or not dress in this case, it's an example i.e man and women have needs and wants and going on from that there is a way in order to fulfill them, either respectfully (marriage, partner) or otherwise. Media has sexualised everything even selling a toothbrush.
Man is exploiting women whether you agree or not that's down to you. Its this exploitation which generates revenue. So as long as it generates revenue it makes it ok does it? Which in turn makes women feel they have to conform to norms which have been laid out by the "elite" which has its mind on its money and its money on its mind. It sounds like me and you have different levels of values. My values are laid out by the one who created me. I didn't have a go at how women chose to dress, its their money and their wardrobe. I did not state its an excuse for any immoral act these are your words, i gave a cause and effect "scenario", didn't give an excuse for such a low down act.
If you look at any action, there is a root to where the action stems from. A problem cannot be solved unless the root is understood. You are missing my point fella, this was not an attact on how women choose to dress or not dress in this case, it's an example i.e man and women have needs and wants and going on from that there is a way in order to fulfill them, either respectfully (marriage, partner) or otherwise. Media has sexualised everything even selling a toothbrush.
Man is exploiting women whether you agree or not that's down to you. Its this exploitation which generates revenue. So as long as it generates revenue it makes it ok does it? Which in turn makes women feel they have to conform to norms which have been laid out by the "elite" which has its mind on its money and its money on its mind. It sounds like me and you have different levels of values. My values are laid out by the one who created me. I didn't have a go at how women chose to dress, its their money and their wardrobe. I did not state its an excuse for any immoral act these are your words, i gave a cause and effect "scenario", didn't give an excuse for such a low down act.
(i.e in summer mainly naked women walking the streets, its like showing a starving lion food and saying you can't have it!!!!! Its part of ones innate nature to eat. )
I am not a "fella" btw.
Stop using the f****** word 'Asian', it's a euphemism form Pakistani. Just say Pakistani you pathetic weaklings.
Last edited by Lisawrx; Jun 23, 2012 at 12:23 AM. Reason: abuse of the swear filter
Like this guy you mean? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...efinitely.html
Last edited by adam405sti; Jun 23, 2012 at 12:43 AM.
To be fair here, this is what adam said:
in summer mainly naked women walking the streets, its like showing a starving lion food and saying you can't have it!!!!! Its part of ones innate nature to eat.
Even to me, and I rarely agree with tony, at all, but I thought it came across like almost saying women are 'asking for it'. I don't think it was a case of putting words in to somebody's mouth to be honest.
Just because a woman might wear less than some people may think she should, doesn't make her fair game and open to abuse. There are plenty of women who wear little, particularly in good weather (men also often reduce the amount of clothes worn), there are also plenty of men that may well eye them up, but not decide to rape them.
in summer mainly naked women walking the streets, its like showing a starving lion food and saying you can't have it!!!!! Its part of ones innate nature to eat.
Even to me, and I rarely agree with tony, at all, but I thought it came across like almost saying women are 'asking for it'. I don't think it was a case of putting words in to somebody's mouth to be honest.
Just because a woman might wear less than some people may think she should, doesn't make her fair game and open to abuse. There are plenty of women who wear little, particularly in good weather (men also often reduce the amount of clothes worn), there are also plenty of men that may well eye them up, but not decide to rape them.
I think you're very deluded if you really believe that some women dont enjoy getting attention from the opposite sex, some women I know openly admit they crave this kind of attention and deliberately use their charms to get their own way.
You are not that naive to believe this does not happen so dont pretend you are. Nobody is saying this is a justifcation for rape.





I thought we were having a discussion. You have not offended me in the slightest. No idea why you changed your post, There was nothing wrong with it.