Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

MOT Failure - Potentially Lethal Problem Found!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #31  
lordretsudo's Avatar
lordretsudo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: NE England
Default

That is a joke. I can't see why naming the tester in question would result in thread deletion - it's not like you'd be libelling anyone, just stating a fact.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #32  
The Rig's Avatar
The Rig
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 8
Default

name and shame,otherwise this thread is pointless
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #33  
windyboy's Avatar
windyboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Working in Belfast and living in Bangor, N'orn I'ron
Default

Once my car failed on a number of things and one of things was that the sunvisor was within the sweep of the wipers (only slightly), but the examiner was taller than me, maybe if the car had only failed on the sunvisor he might of let me away with it but I needed to get the other tings sorted anyway.

In N'orn Iron the MOT centres are part of a government department and run by them so you can't go to a garage or anybody else to get tested, you have to go a official MOT centre so if you do fail the the re-test money goes to the government and not somebody's back pocket.

windyboy.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #34  
jonny_693's Avatar
jonny_693
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 1
From: Hudds
Default

What a jobsworth. Needless to say they've lost your custom over it! Incidently a guy at work once had his car failed by a well known jap main dealer beginning with T. The reason was his churchill nodding dog was too far within a certain radius of the centre of the steering wheel. What an outrage He should of been at least shot for having a nodding dog!
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 07:50 AM
  #35  
DaveR's Avatar
DaveR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
Default

Name and shame, name and shame. Otherwise why bring this to our attention?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #36  
SetoN's Avatar
SetoN
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Madchester
Default

My usual MOT station closed down last year, so this year i had to try somwhere new. The manager was on reception and kept saying how he loved subarus and how he'd owned a few. Turned up an hour later to find it had failed as the side lights would not stay on without the ignition on......

How many subarus you had again boss?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #37  
scoobyhoobydoo's Avatar
scoobyhoobydoo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

If this was the sole reason for the vehicle not gaining a MOT you are within your rights to return to the testing station and inform them of the following :

Advice to vehicle presenters the vehicle presenter should be advised of and given the opportunity to remove any item likely to fail under Reason for Rejection 1 b or 1e before a VT30 is issued,

Some bedtime reading MOT UK car and vehicle MOT information equipment car servicing parts and spares - power steering

If the testing station are demanding a full restest fee for this sole issue I would report them to the VOSA.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
Sep 25, 2015 08:52 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.