Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Acting responsibly or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #31  
[Davey]'s Avatar
[Davey]
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by girl-in-a-scoob
best of luck to you in disciplining a one year old not to play with a dog

Or is it iresponsible adults who have children and think that at one year old they are mature enough to be left with a dog that could harm them... maybe leave the medecine cabinet open too because they will have told the one year old not to touch the contents wouldnt they
More to the point the adult that was incharge of the children should have been more careful.. But your statement that "Children should never be left with any dog" is a bit narrow minded.. So your saying a 15 year old shouldnt be left alone with a dog? Maybe we should wrap them all up in cotton wool and only let them breathe purified air?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #32  
gallois's Avatar
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Default

sad story and especially at this time of year too. i think the old saying familiarity breeds contempt is the main problem here, after all, no-one in their right mind would allow a 7yr old to introduce a baby to an unfamiliar dog. And tbh i think most pet owners are guilty of leaving the room momentarily whilst their pet dog and their child are left alone together, as their dog 'wouldn't hurt a fly' etc. are they as guilty as the parents/grandparents of the baby?.....
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #33  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

Funny how the dog loving lobby always come along and blame other things, and tell how these are great dogs.. Then yet again next time it happens it'll be one of the same handful of breeds.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #34  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by RB5_245
Funny how the dog loving lobby always come along and blame other things, and tell how these are great dogs.. Then yet again next time it happens it'll be one of the same handful of breeds.
How many dog bites were treated in the UK's hospital this year, and from what breeds?

Oh thats right, the UK fails to record them, so the true figures are unknown.

The reason its the same handful of breeds, is as I said earlier, they are trophy dogs, the ones you buy to look 'ard. People that know nothing about the breed buy them to look good, dont know and cant be bothered to train them, as long as they look dangerous. When it comes to the crunch, the same irresponsible owners allow them in dangerous situation.

I have been bitten by a cross breed thing as a child, mum was bitten by a GSD years back...... they aint on the list.

Strange how those who DONT like dogs that much, and know less about them always blame the dog when this happens.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:36 PM
  #35  
paulr's Avatar
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Default

Threads like this, the dog fans will blame the owners, the dog haters will blame the animal and neither will convince the other. All i'd say as someone who doesn't like dogs is if i had a kid who was attacked by someone else's dog, god help the dog and god help the owner.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #36  
jjones's Avatar
jjones
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 1
Default

how many children have died to dog attacks this year?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #37  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Inaccurate Rottweiler Statistics

Interesting read from the USA.

Rottweilers were recorded for 37 mauling deaths mostly during the 1990s. German shepherds followed with 17, Huskies at 15, Malamutes at 12, and Doberman pinschers with nine

Malamutes figure high, but are NOT bred for attacking, guarding (cos they are crap at it) but for pulling sleds lol
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #38  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by jjones
how many children have died to dog attacks this year?
Good question, but a very hard fact to find, due the the lack of recorded statistics.
If the figure could be found, it would be interested to see how many were alone with the dog, with an adult elsewhere in the home.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #39  
paulr's Avatar
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
Good question, but a very hard fact to find, due the the lack of recorded statistics.
If the figure could be found, it would be interested to see how many were alone with the dog, with an adult elsewhere in the home.
But it all depends where you are coming from, pro dogs or anti dogs. I'm not a dog fan and i'd willingly have all potentially dangerous dogs put down if it saved one human life. I'd do it myself too. But then you have people who like dogs and for them its obviously a trade off worth having.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #41  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
But it all depends where you are coming from, pro dogs or anti dogs. I'm not a dog fan and i'd willingly have all potentially dangerous dogs put down if it saved one human life. I'd do it myself too. But then you have people who like dogs and for them its obviously a trade off worth having.
Mate I love my dog, but if he attacked someone for no reason, death or no death I would have him destroyed without thinking twice.
The problem is identifying "dangerous" dogs.

One thing I would love to know, all the people who have been involved with a child death and owned the dog. Are they deemed unfit to have a dog again?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #42  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Originally Posted by girl-in-a-scoob
People who own ANY dog should always keep an eye on them or keep them away from small children....

How many children need to be be maimed or killed as this one year old has been today.

NO DOG is fully child proof...

And why on earth do people have dangerous dogs with small children !



Claire


BBC NEWS | England | West Yorkshire | Family dog kills one-year-old boy
Terrible case and a tragic waste of a small life. Will not comment on the specifics of this particular case any more as it's not productive

Will just say that NO dog should EVER be left unsupervised with a child. Even a small dog can turn and kill an infant!

A Rottie is actually an excellent family pet (it's not a dangerous breed), but like any animal: there are bad examples (more often bad owners) However, it is a animal and, as such is not 100% predictable. It is also a large animal, which has the potential to do significant damage, so common sense dictates you do not leave it unattended with children.

Ns04

Last edited by New_scooby_04; Dec 29, 2007 at 05:04 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #43  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by **************
First of all ANY dog has the potential to 'snap' and kill a 1 year old baby whether it be a Rottweiller or a Jack Russell, all it takes is a bite to the throat and the child could easily be killed as even small dogs have powerfull enough jaws to crush a babys throat. No matter how well a dog is trained whether it's been through military or any other training it can never be trusted 100%.

As for disciplining a 1 year old Yes you can tell it off but do you really think it has the mental capability at that age to learn and remember what it's just been told? All it's thinking about is what it sees at that age.

The fact is this dog reportedly had never shown any aggression previously. It was a trusted family pet and minors were in charge of other minors. A 16 year old is not capable of looking after a number of young children just as pre schools have to have a certain number of staff in relation to how many children they look after.

This was a tragic accident that ultimately is the fault of the owners of the dog in believing it was a 'safe' pet to have children around with not enough supervision.
Totally agree mate.
The dogs have never shown aggression, just like any person killed was "a lovely person, so friendly and helpful, loved by all"

These are the same parents who will swear blind that the kitchen door was shut, and pan of boiling water was at the back of the cooker, and "safe" Just before scalding them.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #44  
T5OLF's Avatar
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
From: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Default

Originally Posted by RB5_245
Funny how the dog loving lobby always come along and blame other things, and tell how these are great dogs.. Then yet again next time it happens it'll be one of the same handful of breeds.
So it's the dogs fault? the trained itself to be that way, yes your right it's always the dogs fault. Nothing to do with the fact that most people don't know how the bring a dog up properly and know it's place in the pack.

This poor kid was left with a 16 year old girl who was looking after a 6 and 7 year old on her own, the 7 year old took the baby outside into the yard were the dog was being kept and showed it to the dog. The dog may have never seen a baby before and thought it was a toy.

The family are to blame for this not the dog.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #45  
T5OLF's Avatar
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
From: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
But it all depends where you are coming from, pro dogs or anti dogs. I'm not a dog fan and i'd willingly have all potentially dangerous dogs put down if it saved one human life. I'd do it myself too. But then you have people who like dogs and for them its obviously a trade off worth having.
Every dog has the potential to be dangerous so that means you would destroy all dogs? yes?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #46  
gallois's Avatar
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by T5OLF
So it's the dogs fault? the trained itself to be that way, yes your right it's always the dogs fault. Nothing to do with the fact that most people don't know how the bring a dog up properly and know it's place in the pack.

This poor kid was left with a 16 year old girl who was looking after a 6 and 7 year old on her own, the 7 year old took the baby outside into the yard were the dog was being kept and showed it to the dog. The dog may have never seen a baby before and thought it was a toy.

The family are to blame for this not the dog.
seems as we are taking this as black and white the dog has killed, it is to blame, the family would be to blame if they trained it to kill babies. the family are partially responsible for the tragedy by not supervising or restraining a dog in a human environment that had the intent to kill. nevertheless im sure the family will blame themselves over and over for a very long time.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #47  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff. Wales
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy



Malamutes figure high, but are NOT bred for attacking, but for pulling sleds
Which they should be left to do. Same as sheepdogs, they should be left to do what they do best.

Chip
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #48  
Ringpeas's Avatar
Ringpeas
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,961
Likes: 0
From: Grimsby
Default

Some interesting comments here.

All dogs, as well as people, have the potential to cause harm.

I would not leave my daughter alone with a dog, or PERSON that I did not know or trust.

I would not even let my daughter into a room with a large or potentially aggressive dog. I don't hate dogs, I just wouldn't expose her to the risk.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #49  
T5OLF's Avatar
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
From: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Which they should be left to do. Same as sheepdogs, they should be left to do what they do best.

Chip
What an uneducated response all dogs were bred for something. What your saying is all dogs should be used for what they bred for and not kept as pets.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #50  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Which they should be left to do. Same as sheepdogs, they should be left to do what they do best.

Chip
wtf

Surely you mean mankind should have left dogs alone FULL STOP and not bred dogs to do anything.
Lets be sensible about this now, dogs have MANY uses, one being very loyal companions.

I appreciate you may not like dogs, but with your wisdom maybe you could help me with the following breeds, and put them back in their "natural" enviroment.

Afghan Hound
Anatolian Karabash
Boxer
Irish Setter
Poodle
Minature Poodle
Pekingese
Shar Pei

I dont think any dog evolved to pull people with loaded sleds, people just bred them to be strong enough to use them that way. Maybe I think its cruel to "enslave" a dog to do such things. Maybe I DO work him............

Also with these wise words, does that mean Akita's, Tosa's Pitbull's etc should be allowed to go around attacking whatever they want, after all they WERE bred to attack and kill.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #51  
pslewis's Avatar
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 1
From: Old Codgers Home
Default

Not read the whole of this thread, but, the dogs are not to blame - it is always the owners!!!

Where were the parents anyway??

Leaving their kids to a 16 year old
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 09:37 PM
  #52  
T5OLF's Avatar
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
From: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
Not read the whole of this thread, but, the dogs are not to blame - it is always the owners!!!

Where were the parents anyway??

Leaving their kids to a 16 year old
Down the pub no doubt. The dog was locked outside in a yard minding it's own business when it had a baby thrust at it by the 7 year old!! were was the 16 year old at this time.

The parents will never forgive themselves. My wife is about to give birth to our first child, I have a staffie who is very soft and friendly but he will never be left alone with our or anyone else's child. He has never been around children much so I cannot trust him just like I can't trust any other dog around my child.

I have read lots of books on how to prepare your dog for the arrival of a baby. It's a shame not all dog owners are as responsible as some of us.

Last edited by T5OLF; Dec 29, 2007 at 09:40 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #53  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by T5OLF
So it's the dogs fault? the trained itself to be that way, yes your right it's always the dogs fault. Nothing to do with the fact that most people don't know how the bring a dog up properly and know it's place in the pack.

This poor kid was left with a 16 year old girl who was looking after a 6 and 7 year old on her own, the 7 year old took the baby outside into the yard were the dog was being kept and showed it to the dog. The dog may have never seen a baby before and thought it was a toy.

The family are to blame for this not the dog.
Did you read the post you quoted at all? I mentioned nothing of training, or blame, or owners.

It's a simple case of, (almost ) every time a child gets attacked by a dog (that is in the news) it's of the same breeds. Rottie, Dalmation, Pitbull. I don't care about the other factors.

I've been brought up around dogs, as a child a friend had a couple of rottwielers and after a couple of close calls I never went back to his house. They never attacked anyone but some close calls. I guarantee these were well trained animals and we were all around 10-12yrs old, not exactly pulling their ears.

I have no problem with people walking these without leads or a muzzle on the street, if you can control it then fine. However I also want to carry a gun so I'm not on the recieving end of - "Well He's never done anything like that before"

IMO walking around with one of those breeds is no different to walking around brandishing loaded gun.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #54  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by RB5_245
Did you read the post you quoted at all? I mentioned nothing of training, or blame, or owners.

It's a simple case of, (almost ) every time a child gets attacked by a dog (that is in the news) it's of the same breeds. Rottie, Dalmation, Pitbull. I don't care about the other factors.

lol @ not caring about the other factors, slightly ignorant and biased.

I've been brought up around dogs, as a child a friend had a couple of rottwielers and after a couple of close calls I never went back to his house. They never attacked anyone but some close calls. I guarantee these were well trained animals and we were all around 10-12yrs old, not exactly pulling their ears.

I have no problem with people walking these without leads or a muzzle on the street, if you can control it then fine. However I also want to carry a gun so I'm not on the recieving end of - "Well He's never done anything like that before"

Without a lead by definition is NOT under control, personally in public, dogs belong on leads.

IMO walking around with one of those breeds is no different to walking around brandishing loaded gun.

Slight differences somehow, not a great example, and just identifying a few breeds as "dangerous" but saying all others are ok?
Just my opinions of course, as these are yours
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #55  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

The vast majority of Rottweilers are beautiful, docile, obedient dogs that are fantastic around children. [/QUOTE]

The owners of the dog in question have used similar words to describe their murderous pet!

Dogs like these say more about their owners, and their own lack of self esteem ' I'm a big man, I've got a real mans dog'
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #56  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
The vast majority of Rottweilers are beautiful, docile, obedient dogs that are fantastic around children.
The owners of the dog in question have used similar words to describe their murderous pet!

Dogs like these say more about their owners, and their own lack of self esteem ' I'm a big man, I've got a real mans dog'[/QUOTE]


They CAN be seen that way, but sadly its the wrong people buying these dogs. A lot of the owners are very responsible and train their dogs, but as above, some ARE trophy dogs, for show. The more aggressive it looks, all the better.

Good example the other day, Staf with its owner in the park, has a full harness on, yet is off the lead! So whats the harness for? Same thing again a month or so back in another park.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #57  
Jamo's Avatar
Jamo
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,346
Likes: 7
From: in a house full of girls!
Default

Rally Blue Subaru Impreza Type 25's with big spoilers.

Cars like these say more about their owners, and their own lack of self esteem' I'm a big man, I've got a really small *****.

same yeah?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #58  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

Originally Posted by shaggy1973
Rally Blue Subaru Impreza's with big spoilers.

Cars like these say more about their owners, and their own lack of self esteem' I'm a big man, I've got a really small *****.

same yeah?
Thought that was more BMW drivers lol.

Serious though, I dont think cars are quite the same trophies as dogs.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #59  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by shaggy1973
Rally Blue Subaru Impreza Type 25's with big spoilers.

Cars like these say more about their owners, and their own lack of self esteem' I'm a big man, I've got a really small *****.

same yeah?
Did I touch a nerve?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #60  
Jamo's Avatar
Jamo
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,346
Likes: 7
From: in a house full of girls!
Default

yes martin you offended me.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.