First drive of a Supra today
#31
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Their VTEC systems are ****. Not in the same league as Mpower engines. BHP per litre its irrelevant, its how its delivered that counts.
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middle east
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Varboy
Personally I think this Vanos going pop thing is overated, yes they do and yes it is an inherent flaw, but no it doesn't happen to every BMW M powered car on the road.
#33
one thing to bear in mind is that the supra is even quicker once you are used to how to drive it. If you get somebody who knows the car to take you for a drive round then its even more amazing.
I look forward to seeing you at some of the Supra meets when you get it.
JB
www.mkivsupra.net
I look forward to seeing you at some of the Supra meets when you get it.
JB
www.mkivsupra.net
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dan have you driven a Honda long enough to understand one? Or are you pub talk power monger??
Can you also quantify "****"? Im a mechanical engineer so would be most interested to hear your synopsis on its flaws.... You may know that they have never had one reported to fail.
MB
Can you also quantify "****"? Im a mechanical engineer so would be most interested to hear your synopsis on its flaws.... You may know that they have never had one reported to fail.
MB
Last edited by Dark Blue Mark; 24 September 2006 at 05:42 PM.
#35
Originally Posted by Dark Blue Mark
Dan have you driven a Honda long enough to understand one? Or are you pub talk power monger??
Can you also quantiy "****"? Im a mechanical engineer so would be most interested to hear your synopsis on its flaws....
MB
Can you also quantiy "****"? Im a mechanical engineer so would be most interested to hear your synopsis on its flaws....
MB
#36
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one thing to bear in mind is that the supra is even quicker once you are used to how to drive it.
1. Select drive
2. Plant throttle into the carpet
#38
Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
I'll let you handle this one mark
I usually let vtec speak for itself on the road
I usually let vtec speak for itself on the road
#39
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also think its telling that in the last 2 months between us we've tried:
* 250bhp VX220 Turbo
* 350bhp Skyline
* Evo 8
* R33 Skyline
* Other you haven't mentioned and we are both still swithering and both have a well documented love for performance cars
* 250bhp VX220 Turbo
* 350bhp Skyline
* Evo 8
* R33 Skyline
* Other you haven't mentioned and we are both still swithering and both have a well documented love for performance cars
#40
Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
Nevermind
I was simply responding to, "+ the problems with the M engine stems from the fact that they are as close to race engines that you can get on the road (out of the box that is). Not many other manufactures dare make a road car engine that offers 100bhp + litre naturally aspirated"
There is another manufacturer and they arguably do it better
I was simply responding to, "+ the problems with the M engine stems from the fact that they are as close to race engines that you can get on the road (out of the box that is). Not many other manufactures dare make a road car engine that offers 100bhp + litre naturally aspirated"
There is another manufacturer and they arguably do it better
#41
Originally Posted by Dark Blue Mark
Dan have you driven a Honda long enough to understand one? Or are you pub talk power monger??
Can you also quantify "****"? Im a mechanical engineer so would be most interested to hear your synopsis on its flaws.... You may know that they have never had one reported to fail.
MB
Can you also quantify "****"? Im a mechanical engineer so would be most interested to hear your synopsis on its flaws.... You may know that they have never had one reported to fail.
MB
Thats not true over in yank land several s2000 engines have gone pop, but then again those ***** dont know how to drive something without breaking it, as they are too used to their lazy piece of **** V8's
#42
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The engine's pop - thats not hard!!! Drive any engine without oil and it will blow up but there has never been a failure of the VTEC system. Ever
#43
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I must say I find it odd that in enthusiast circles vtec is regarded so lowly and yet in engineering circles its appreciated for its simplicity and yet effectiveness. It really seems like 95% of car enthusiasts are not interested in an engine unless you can ran 1.5 bar off boost through it reliably. Their loss
#44
Now I undertstand what you mean. Dont know why so many people speak so badly about v-tec. I myself couldnt give a toss. If its fun to drive, then its fun to drive. Unless its american, as something that doenst do corners isnt fun.
#45
Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
The engine's pop - thats not hard!!! Drive any engine without oil and it will blow up but there has never been a failure of the VTEC system. Ever
#46
Scooby Regular
to get the post back on topic (as the lary people seem to have stuck the awe in!!! )
Supra - great car. Would love one, but the days of a 2dr have long since left me!!! (hence my defection to a performance Audi avant!! )
The only thing that would put me off is the running costs, such as the rear tyres. IIRC, they're meaty to say the least!!
But as others have said, it's got to be a case of trying it on your daily run, to see if you could live with it.
Daft question, is the boot big?
Dan
Supra - great car. Would love one, but the days of a 2dr have long since left me!!! (hence my defection to a performance Audi avant!! )
The only thing that would put me off is the running costs, such as the rear tyres. IIRC, they're meaty to say the least!!
But as others have said, it's got to be a case of trying it on your daily run, to see if you could live with it.
Daft question, is the boot big?
Dan
#47
Originally Posted by AudiLover
Now I undertstand what you mean. Dont know why so many people speak so badly about v-tec. I myself couldnt give a toss. If its fun to drive, then its fun to drive. Unless its american, as something that doenst do corners isnt fun.
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, have you seen some of the race spec S2000's - many still running a 2l capacity? They make amazing race / track cars and will keep up with really big stuff.
Also, "its nowhere near as complicated" is a rather odd statement. It is true, but also reveals you will never be an engineer
MB
Also, "its nowhere near as complicated" is a rather odd statement. It is true, but also reveals you will never be an engineer
MB
Last edited by Dark Blue Mark; 24 September 2006 at 06:28 PM.
#49
Originally Posted by Dark Blue Mark
Lol, have you seen some of the race spec S2000's - many still running a 2l capacity? They make amazing race / track cars and will keep up with really big stuff.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...91&q=M3+nissan
Also, "its nowhere near as complicated" is a rather odd statement. It is true, but also reveals you will never be an engineer
MB
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...91&q=M3+nissan
Also, "its nowhere near as complicated" is a rather odd statement. It is true, but also reveals you will never be an engineer
MB
And im not an engineer - which you seem to view as a negative. Are we all to aspire to be engineers? Am I missing out? If i become an engineer will I trade in my Evo for a cheap sports car? Is this the way forward? Hello???
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No its just you are arguing the BMW variant is better, which I dont believe it is technically. Again, define less effective and poor power delivery.
A 3.2 producing 350 bhp (109.375 bhp per litre)
Or squeezing 240 bhp from a 2 litre... (120 bhp per litre)
RELIABLY
MB
A 3.2 producing 350 bhp (109.375 bhp per litre)
Or squeezing 240 bhp from a 2 litre... (120 bhp per litre)
RELIABLY
MB
#52
Originally Posted by Dark Blue Mark
No its just you are arguing the BMW variant is better, which I dont believe it is technically. Again, define less effective and poor power delivery.
A 3.2 producing 350 bhp (109.375 bhp per litre)
Or squeezing 240 bhp from a 2 litre... (120 bhp per litre)
RELIABLY
MB
A 3.2 producing 350 bhp (109.375 bhp per litre)
Or squeezing 240 bhp from a 2 litre... (120 bhp per litre)
RELIABLY
MB
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its not easy at all, unless you go for forced induction. The 2l F20C is well heralded as an amazing piece of engineering. Hell its got more power than a 2l turbo WRX!
I think you have lost the train of this.
You said the VTEC is **** and cant back it up.
MB
I think you have lost the train of this.
You said the VTEC is **** and cant back it up.
MB
#55
Originally Posted by Dark Blue Mark
its not easy at all, unless you go for forced induction. The 2l F20C is well heralded as an amazing piece of engineering. Hell its got more power than a 2l turbo WRX!
I think you have lost the train of this.
You said the VTEC is **** and cant back it up.
MB
I think you have lost the train of this.
You said the VTEC is **** and cant back it up.
MB
#56
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Daft question, is the boot big?
Vtec is perfectly acceptable for racing. If you take the S2000 and keep her above 7000rpm it pulls hard and instantly so all of the time. Keeping it above 7000rpm is NOT hard even on the public road and is even easier on a track. I really can't understand why people don't get this. I honestly fear that I'm part of some elite enlightened handful of the species that naturally knows how to get 100% of performance from an engine
My MY99 scooby had ~280bhp and the S2000 is just as fast when I work it. The difference is that if I want I can get 100% of the subaru performance from 75% effort and you can't do that with vtec.
I can't believe I've let myself be drawn into this again Mark, you didn't fight the corner well enough
#57
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have found the engines lacking in flexibility.
#58
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But you haven't driven one??
If you just look at the car and not the engine, and compare the 3 litre V6 from the NSX (which is around 18 years old) it produced 280-300 bhp and still is reliable. I have no doubt they could now push a 3L engine waaay further than that using the iVtec and still keep it relaible. Both of them have extensive F1 experience at the end of the day.
Im not having a pop at BMW btw, the M3 is a great car - im just saying that the Honda VTEC does the same thing, simpler and therefore more reliable.
Its just the fact that they currently dont have a car in the same range to compare to the M3. I would take an NSX over an M3 though...
MB
If you just look at the car and not the engine, and compare the 3 litre V6 from the NSX (which is around 18 years old) it produced 280-300 bhp and still is reliable. I have no doubt they could now push a 3L engine waaay further than that using the iVtec and still keep it relaible. Both of them have extensive F1 experience at the end of the day.
Im not having a pop at BMW btw, the M3 is a great car - im just saying that the Honda VTEC does the same thing, simpler and therefore more reliable.
Its just the fact that they currently dont have a car in the same range to compare to the M3. I would take an NSX over an M3 though...
MB
#59
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've not driven a M3 so I can't comment but John Banks, a well respected board member, reports that they were comparitively gutless with all their power at the top end JUST like vtec. Of course an M3 has more grunt than an S2000 because its got 1.2l and 2 cyclinders more but I think the point is for a 3.2 straight 6 its pretty rev-reliant as well.
I can't help but feel you've made a fairly uneducated attack on an entire technology without much in the way of supporting evidence. Also, what do you drive Dan?
I can't help but feel you've made a fairly uneducated attack on an entire technology without much in the way of supporting evidence. Also, what do you drive Dan?
#60
Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
Why do would want flexibility for racing or fast road driving. If you want flexibility buy a 150pdtdi or a 330d or 535d or a big CC lazy V8