Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Petition to support medical research on animals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #61  
middxsti's Avatar
middxsti
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNUjkM_DC_A&search=hls
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #62  
ScoobLou's Avatar
ScoobLou
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,623
Likes: 1
From: In a house
Default

Originally Posted by middxsti
warwick-hunt i'm with you.

Nat 21 what if someone forced a 10" needle up your *** i'm sure you wouldn't like it.These animals have no voice,that's why they are used.Why not sign a petition to find replacements for animals in research,a far more humane thing to do.
Lets do it, he obviously needs it

People like you Nat 21 make me sick

If you are for testing, why not put yourselve forward to be tested on
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #63  
shooter007's Avatar
shooter007
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: west yorks
Default

i may not be an animal rights activist nat 21 but i think this is sick sorry but imo in this day and age this is one right we do not have
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #64  
Diesel's Avatar
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Default

I can do without a new type of oven cleaner that has been used to destroy the eyes and bodies of animals held in stocks. I can actually live fine with all the shampoos that are currently available and do not need further ones tested on the eyes of rabbits [an animal chosen as it can not cry and dilute the pain].

In the meantime and until ALL the animal testers and breeders get their act and morals in gear I will be against it ALL. We could all make a morally considered exception for a genuine medical wonder drug, but I think the whole house needs to be put in order, with animals AND humans put before profit, vanity, marketing and corporate greed. I’m sure those that almost died form the immunosuppressant test recently would agree about the efficacy of testing on animals too...
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #65  
brumdaisy's Avatar
brumdaisy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Default

Much as I sighed with relief when this thread finally seemed to die (without any unnecessary cruelty to animals) I have to add that Nat21, who started it all off, never actually posted on it again...

Now is it because:

a) Nat 21 is naive and didnt see how this would explode so ran for cover?

b) Nat 21 was just looking for some wooden spoon entertainment?

or c) Nat 21 is too gutless to finish what he/she started?

just wondered!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
An0n0m0us
Computer & Technology Related
0
Sep 28, 2015 09:58 PM
super_ted
Wanted
2
Sep 17, 2015 08:11 PM
WRXrowdy
Computer & Technology Related
6
Sep 15, 2015 08:56 PM
matt12
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
4
Sep 14, 2015 09:36 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 AM.