WRX humbled by ****box.
#241
Originally Posted by scoobystue
i didnt say it would stay with an evo 4-5 or sti and im sure not into this "my cars faster than yours"crap either!! im fully over it as im 33 not 17 ive just finished stripping the gti6 out so im hoping its lost a few kgs by now
Though 12 pages of comedy would attempt to desperately contradict that "fact". lol.
#249
Scooby Regular
Nice to see you catching the bait in other threads as well delta
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=464766
When will you learn?
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=464766
When will you learn?
#251
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by DeltaBravo 9
or when people with sh**boxes stop talking s**t
#252
Originally Posted by DeltaBravo 9
or when people with sh**boxes stop talking s**t
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than Gti6. FACT
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Stripped out Bug WRX is A LOT quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Thats it, as simple as that. This thread no longer needs to continue
#254
Originally Posted by JCScooby
The problem is mate, when somebody has a **** box they cant stop themself from talking ****. They make up wee stories about beating cars that they can only dream of owning or being able to handle. Then when folk come on who know better and pour cold water over there fire, they try to claim a consolation prize which normally go's like "they take the bait everytime" when in actual fact there is no "bait". The FACTS are we all know these are bull**** made up stories but only some are will to admit to that
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than Gti6. FACT
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Stripped out Bug WRX is A LOT quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Thats it, as simple as that. This thread no longer needs to continue
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than Gti6. FACT
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Stripped out Bug WRX is A LOT quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Thats it, as simple as that. This thread no longer needs to continue
I only put my new car a 172 pics on here an shock i had people telling me what a crap car it is an my car will beat it. SO FECKING WHAT. i had a 93 classic import an had a race with a mate in a punto gt turbo an there was **** all in it.
CLASSIC IMPORT IS QUICK THAN A BUG EYE
My bro in law a leon cupra r an had a race with a classic import last night an pulled away from it. Just get back to the real world boys impreza's are not the quickest car's in the world.
I did like my scooby an will buy another one but there are cars out there that r quicker than them
#255
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North West
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JCScooby
The problem is mate, when somebody has a **** box they cant stop themself from talking ****. They make up wee stories about beating cars that they can only dream of owning or being able to handle. Then when folk come on who know better and pour cold water over there fire, they try to claim a consolation prize which normally go's like "they take the bait everytime" when in actual fact there is no "bait". The FACTS are we all know these are bull**** made up stories but only some are will to admit to that
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than Gti6. FACT
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Stripped out Bug WRX is A LOT quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Thats it, as simple as that. This thread no longer needs to continue
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than Gti6. FACT
Bug eye WRX IS quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Stripped out Bug WRX is A LOT quicker than stripped out Gti6. FACT
Thats it, as simple as that. This thread no longer needs to continue
I think this now needs to be settled. Get a GTI6 and a Bug eye WRX and a camera and post the result up... i'll happily join in and give the bug eye a pasting in my 10 year old Clio (yes pasting, as in MUCH quicker). I could even bring some passengers to make it fair...
Can't believe some people think group 17 insurance is for supercars ROFLMAO
#256
Originally Posted by TheJesus
PMSL, you've been owned mate, sucked in good and proper. you may think it didn't happen, but I can quite easily see a GTI6 being at least as quick (or should it be slow?) as a WRX. You only have to look at 1/4 mile time and realise that the zero to sixty is the only reason the Scoob has a better time. It's an Impreza, it's not the fastest car in world despite some people belief.
I think this now needs to be settled. Get a GTI6 and a Bug eye WRX and a camera and post the result up... i'll happily join in and give the bug eye a pasting in my 10 year old Clio (yes pasting, as in MUCH quicker). I could even bring some passengers to make it fair...
Can't believe some people think group 17 insurance is for supercars ROFLMAO
I think this now needs to be settled. Get a GTI6 and a Bug eye WRX and a camera and post the result up... i'll happily join in and give the bug eye a pasting in my 10 year old Clio (yes pasting, as in MUCH quicker). I could even bring some passengers to make it fair...
Can't believe some people think group 17 insurance is for supercars ROFLMAO
I'll be non argumentative, and with this post will stop fishing and state what are the real facts. You can only say "FACT" when that is indeed the case.
These kids on here see 0-60's and cream their pants. What they do not realise (and given time and 'experience' they will) is that in gear, incorporating power to weight there is little in it (with the aforementioned cars). Scoobs "launch" exceptionally well, giving their 0-60 times a boost.
Now, a Clio 172 Cup has a SLOWER 0-60 than a post classic WRX yet a FASTER 0-100 time. Now, after my old ****box was stripped out I had a little drive with Davyboy in his 172 Cup (me in the Pug). There was nothing in it, and by that I mean zero, zilch. The cars were equally as quick. So, if my car is as equally quick as his 172 Cup, which is PROVEN (there's that FACT word again) to be QUICKER than a WRX to 100 - there is all the evidence anybody with half a brain(cell) needs.
The FACT of the matter remains just.
Though the comical responses of denial just added a wonderful sheen to the whole thing.
Last edited by Senior_AP; 20 October 2005 at 06:34 PM.
#257
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: northampton
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is funny for the record i never said my gti6 was faster than a bug eye who did?? when my gti6 is finished ill gladly take it to santa pod(or wherever) and have a head to head with a bug eye to see whats faster,and even if i lose ill take it on the chin unfortunatly i dont have a bug eye just another **** box of a my97 some people just do my head in thinking there cars the quickest on the planet when quite frankly they aint shall i get my fishing tackle now
#258
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JCScooby
The problem is mate, when somebody has a **** box they cant stop themself from talking ****. They make up wee stories about beating cars that they can only dream of owning or being able to handle.
I have a ****box, (though its not ), its one of the most respected hot hatches ever, a 1.9 205 GTi - the one everything else is compared to. Am I making up wee stories about beating cars I could not afford? No.
I've had a 270bhp Uk Classic Turbo which would p!ss on a lard assed, slow bugeye WRX standard for standard or mod for mod. I've had a MKIV Supra Twin Turbo. I currently have an R33 Skyline GTR, 200SX (another bug eye toaster ), the 1.9 205 and a Yamaha FZ6 which would kick most cars asses.
So your argument is pretty much as holy as:
a) The Pope
b) Some lace/net curtains
TTFN
#259
Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
Nice to see you catching the bait in other threads as well delta
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=464766
When will you learn?
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=464766
When will you learn?
#260
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
That is indeed the cut and dry of it.
I'll be non argumentative, and with this post will stop fishing and state what are the real facts. You can only say "FACT" when that is indeed the case.
These kids on here see 0-60's and cream their pants. What they do not realise (and given time and 'experience' they will) is that in gear, incorporating power to weight there is little in it (with the aforementioned cars). Scoobs "launch" exceptionally well, giving their 0-60 times a boost.
Now, a Clio 172 Cup has a SLOWER 0-60 than a post classic WRX yet a FASTER 0-100 time. Now, after my old ****box was stripped out I had a little drive with Davyboy in his 172 Cup (me in the Pug). There was nothing in it, and by that I mean zero, zilch. The cars were equally as quick. So, if my car is as equally quick as his 172 Cup, which is PROVEN (there's that FACT word again) to be QUICKER than a WRX to 100 - there is all the evidence anybody with half a brain(cell) needs.
The FACT of the matter remains just.
Though the comical responses of denial just added a wonderful sheen to the whole thing.
I'll be non argumentative, and with this post will stop fishing and state what are the real facts. You can only say "FACT" when that is indeed the case.
These kids on here see 0-60's and cream their pants. What they do not realise (and given time and 'experience' they will) is that in gear, incorporating power to weight there is little in it (with the aforementioned cars). Scoobs "launch" exceptionally well, giving their 0-60 times a boost.
Now, a Clio 172 Cup has a SLOWER 0-60 than a post classic WRX yet a FASTER 0-100 time. Now, after my old ****box was stripped out I had a little drive with Davyboy in his 172 Cup (me in the Pug). There was nothing in it, and by that I mean zero, zilch. The cars were equally as quick. So, if my car is as equally quick as his 172 Cup, which is PROVEN (there's that FACT word again) to be QUICKER than a WRX to 100 - there is all the evidence anybody with half a brain(cell) needs.
The FACT of the matter remains just.
Though the comical responses of denial just added a wonderful sheen to the whole thing.
#261
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by DeltaBravo 9
now there is the pot calling the kettle black , how's it go ?? gotcha !!!!!!!!!
#262
Originally Posted by mattvortex
Jesus! some of you people need to get out more!!.
Originally Posted by mattvortex
If all your bothered about in a car is in 0-60, o-100 etc , why not go out and get a high powered Caterham or similar? .
Originally Posted by mattvortex
Believe it or not but some scooby owners really couldnt give a **** if there out accelerated by some stripped-out hot-hatch, driven by some bloke with an inferiority complex! .
Originally Posted by mattvortex
Some , like myself own the car because of how it drives-the traction, the character/sound etc
Originally Posted by mattvortex
Iam sure the modified Clio Williams i owned before would just about keep up after about 40mph with the scooby i have now
#264
Originally Posted by fromage
Classic, still going strong I can see ..........
.... Power to the Pug (and all ****box's)
.... Power to the Pug (and all ****box's)
5 points for the name of this man.
http://www.christyanncharters.co.uk/...od_catfish.jpg
Bonus 3 points for the name of his cult TV show.
#265
Scooby Regular
The thing is, everyone is getting upset cos they think we are rubbishing the Impreza, but not once has any of us said the Impreza is anything but superb - we wouldnt be on here if we didnt think so.
I would own one, but the car jacking puts me off.
As for Scoob owners not giving a ****, in my experience they absolutely hate it when I keep up with them in the 205, and even more so when I overtake them (the last Dales Run being an example)
I would own one, but the car jacking puts me off.
As for Scoob owners not giving a ****, in my experience they absolutely hate it when I keep up with them in the 205, and even more so when I overtake them (the last Dales Run being an example)
#266
Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
The thing is, everyone is getting upset cos they think we are rubbishing the Impreza, but not once has any of us said the Impreza is anything but superb - we wouldnt be on here if we didnt think so.
I would own one, but the car jacking puts me off.
As for Scoob owners not giving a ****, in my experience they absolutely hate it when I keep up with them in the 205, and even more so when I overtake them (the last Dales Run being an example)
I would own one, but the car jacking puts me off.
As for Scoob owners not giving a ****, in my experience they absolutely hate it when I keep up with them in the 205, and even more so when I overtake them (the last Dales Run being an example)
#268
Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
As for Porsche Boxster owners, thats way more satisfying
Doing 911's at the 'Ring is good fun, though in that case it's mostly down to driver (in)ability, lack of experience on the track, or maybe them not wanting to spank there expensive motor; which is fair enough.
Unlike when against WRX's as in that case it's purely down to the fact they're not very quick. God forbid what a WRX around the 'Ring would be like with a poor driver!! Would take all day to get round!!!
#270
Originally Posted by DeltaBravo 9
i wish i could drive like you !! i would be a racing driver for sure !!