close call
#31
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
look lads, lets stop all this point scoring nonsense...i had a close call, and if idve hit the guy and his kids, im pretty sure i wouldnt have been at fault, thats why i dont feel guilty about it...it doesnt matter what speed i was going or what hazard i was focused on, there will always be someone saying i shouldve been doing it differently, and thats all very well with the benefit of hindsight, as it always is...
however, its just another cautionary tale of what can and does happen on the roads, and if it makes one more person think about their driving, then thats cool...i certainly learned from it
however, its just another cautionary tale of what can and does happen on the roads, and if it makes one more person think about their driving, then thats cool...i certainly learned from it
#32
Originally Posted by brihoppy
tell you what, i always take care at that junction because of the masses waiting to cross but i did learn a lesson, maybe i didnt change gear though i seem to remember doing so, but see whats happening now...? in the nicest possible way, the blame is starting to shift ever so slightly in my direction...imagine what it would be like if id hit them...?!
One of them got up and started screaming - the other was laying face down in a pool of blood - fitting.
Certainly made me more aware of pedestrians et all all around me when driving - it might not be your fault - but trust me - It aint a nice feeling running over two young girls .
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shonen
I suggest you talk this over with your driving instructor at your next lesson
I dont have a driving instructor as i passed my test years ago. All i have to say is that if I hit a pedestrian and it is their fault as they stepped into a road without looking to see if it was safe to do so, it will hurt them more than it will hurt me.
I dont have a driving instructor as i passed my test years ago. All i have to say is that if I hit a pedestrian and it is their fault as they stepped into a road without looking to see if it was safe to do so, it will hurt them more than it will hurt me.
Do you slow down in the fog or do you consider that clear driving conditions as well?
#34
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and by the way when i say i dont feel guilty, i meant about not hitting them because i wasnt driving like an idiot...under the same circumstances, if i had hit them im sure id feel differently, despite not being at fault
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brihoppy
look lads, lets stop all this point scoring nonsense...i had a close call, and if idve hit the guy and his kids, im pretty sure i wouldnt have been at fault, thats why i dont feel guilty about it...it doesnt matter what speed i was going or what hazard i was focused on, there will always be someone saying i shouldve been doing it differently, and thats all very well with the benefit of hindsight, as it always is...
however, its just another cautionary tale of what can and does happen on the roads, and if it makes one more person think about their driving, then thats cool...i certainly learned from it
however, its just another cautionary tale of what can and does happen on the roads, and if it makes one more person think about their driving, then thats cool...i certainly learned from it
#38
Originally Posted by OllyK
I'm glad it has made you more of the risks, sadly Shonen seems to have a f*ck the pedestrians attitude, I'll be all right, it's your problem. We don't need people with that kind of attitude on the roads.
If the pedestrian has a death wish there's **** all anyone can do about it - Except give up driving all together !
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not that bothered what OllyK has said as in my arguments I have stuck to the facts but OllyK cant put forward a reasoned debate with out insults. So if my **** the pedestrians attitude winds him up, good!
#40
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Reality
That's a bit harsh - Shonen described almost exactly what happened in my incident. I saw the Girls - they were walking towards a lights controlled pedestrian crossing - I had right of way. Two people in front of them stopped as they had to wait for the green man - I continued on my way. The two girls just walked past the two people waiting and straight into my path.
If the pedestrian has a death wish there's **** all anyone can do about it - Except give up driving all together !
If the pedestrian has a death wish there's **** all anyone can do about it - Except give up driving all together !
point i was originally trying to make, well i wasnt really but i will now, is it never ceases to amaze me the stupid things people do without thinking...that guys kids could be dead now just because he had a brain fart crossing the road...we all screw up on the roads from time to time, and anyone that says they dont is an out and out liar...
#41
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shonen - Sadly pedestrians don't do what they should and ultimately put the onus on vehicle drivers more and more nowadays.
As a driver you need eyes in the back of your head and it's made far more difficult by these useless individuals who don't think before acting whilst walking on or across a road.
Sometimes you can't win because driving cautiously often upsets vehicle drivers who maybe haven't seen the potential hazard that you have.
I'm with you on sentiment though, roads aren't for clueless idiots whether pedestrian or driving.
It's interesting to see the new government adverts that appear to highlight pedestrians in the wrong rather than blaming a speeding motorist.
As a driver you need eyes in the back of your head and it's made far more difficult by these useless individuals who don't think before acting whilst walking on or across a road.
Sometimes you can't win because driving cautiously often upsets vehicle drivers who maybe haven't seen the potential hazard that you have.
I'm with you on sentiment though, roads aren't for clueless idiots whether pedestrian or driving.
It's interesting to see the new government adverts that appear to highlight pedestrians in the wrong rather than blaming a speeding motorist.
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brihoppy
and ollyk, im glad youre glad i learned something, but a bit patronising dont you think...?
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by imlach
No.
1) The road ahead was NOT clear.
2) He didn't have a clear view of the road ahead as a transit van was hiding a person & two kids who were on said road. Experience teaches you to be aware of this (ice cream van scenario).
1) The road ahead was NOT clear.
2) He didn't have a clear view of the road ahead as a transit van was hiding a person & two kids who were on said road. Experience teaches you to be aware of this (ice cream van scenario).
To add...I'm amazed at the driving perfection some Scoobynetters hold people to.
Last edited by Frosty The Snowman; 25 August 2005 at 02:48 PM.
#46
Originally Posted by Frosty The Snowman
This was purely the fault of the pedestrian, even if brihoppy been travelling at 5mph looking on all directions someone walking out at the wrong time WILL get hit. Drivers cannot be held completely responsible for every accident that occurs on a road between them and pedestrians and the pedestrians, especially in this case, should not have been doing what they were doing definitely when they have kids in tow too.
#47
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Sure - but it has been pointed out several times to Shonen - that a van stopping you from seeing people means they are obscured, it means the bit of road they are on is obscured and that if the road is obscured you need to slow down. Shonen seems to think that becuase you couldn't see them, it means they don't exist. It could have been they were trying to peek round the van to see if anything was coming - I don't know. But trying to claim the view wasn't obscured it just plain blinkered.
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Frosty The Snowman
To add...I'm amazed at the driving perfection some Scoobynetters hold people to.
Yes the pedestrian was at fault, but so was the driver. Thankfully a serious accident was avoided, however both could have done more to have prevented it getting to the stage that it did. Nobody is perfect but that's no excuse for accepting mediocraty either. Brihoppy has learnt and others have been reminded to take a little more care at junctions, even more so when your view is obsucured and a small minority seem to have learnt nothing.
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by imlach
I never said the pedestrian wasn't at fault..........
If everyone drove round always expecting a loony to jump out of a hedgerow, or from behind a car, for no apparent reason they would never get anywhere.
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brihoppy
so patronise shonen, not me please...
i get the feeling that in those circumstances i couldnt have been going slow enough for some people and shouldve in fact stopped at the green light and waited until the van had moved away...?!
#52
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
And I'm amazed the lack of responsibility some SN's seem to think drivers have.
Yes the pedestrian was at fault, but so was the driver. Thankfully a serious accident was avoided, however both could have done more to have prevented it getting to the stage that it did. Nobody is perfect but that's no excuse for accepting mediocraty either. Brihoppy has learnt and others have been reminded to take a little more care at junctions, even more so when your view is obsucured and a small minority seem to have learnt nothing.
Yes the pedestrian was at fault, but so was the driver. Thankfully a serious accident was avoided, however both could have done more to have prevented it getting to the stage that it did. Nobody is perfect but that's no excuse for accepting mediocraty either. Brihoppy has learnt and others have been reminded to take a little more care at junctions, even more so when your view is obsucured and a small minority seem to have learnt nothing.
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Frosty The Snowman
No, but there are a fair few people replying to this with their hindsight spectacles firmly on and I would bet the vast majority would have done exactly as Brihoppy so why all the criticism?
If everyone drove round always expecting a loony to jump out of a hedgerow, or from behind a car, for no apparent reason they would never get anywhere.
If everyone drove round always expecting a loony to jump out of a hedgerow, or from behind a car, for no apparent reason they would never get anywhere.
We are both saying, "both" are at fault and let it be a lesson to us all to take that bit more care when your view is obscured. If it is a wide open road, then there is nowhere for anybody to jump out from without you getting some warning. When the reaction time is reduced, around town and in heavy traffic then we have to drive accordingly.
#54
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
And I'm amazed the lack of responsibility some SN's seem to think drivers have.
Yes the pedestrian was at fault, but so was the driver. Thankfully a serious accident was avoided, however both could have done more to have prevented it getting to the stage that it did. Nobody is perfect but that's no excuse for accepting mediocraty either. Brihoppy has learnt and others have been reminded to take a little more care at junctions, even more so when your view is obsucured and a small minority seem to have learnt nothing.
Yes the pedestrian was at fault, but so was the driver. Thankfully a serious accident was avoided, however both could have done more to have prevented it getting to the stage that it did. Nobody is perfect but that's no excuse for accepting mediocraty either. Brihoppy has learnt and others have been reminded to take a little more care at junctions, even more so when your view is obsucured and a small minority seem to have learnt nothing.
i have done some silly things on the road in the past that have had me kicking myself, but this wasnt one of them and if youre driving is so perfect ollyk, then i bow to your magnificence...
#55
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brihoppy
so patronise shonen, not me please...
I thought I was?
'youre glad i learned something...' little bit patronising...
so patronise shonen, not me please...
I thought I was?
'youre glad i learned something...' little bit patronising...
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
I think the bee that both imlach and myself have is the attitude that "it's all the pedestrians fault, the driver did nothing wrong and could have done more"
We are both saying, "both" are at fault and let it be a lesson to us all to take that bit more care when your view is obscured. If it is a wide open road, then there is nowhere for anybody to jump out from without you getting some warning. When the reaction time is reduced, around town and in heavy traffic then we have to drive accordingly.
We are both saying, "both" are at fault and let it be a lesson to us all to take that bit more care when your view is obscured. If it is a wide open road, then there is nowhere for anybody to jump out from without you getting some warning. When the reaction time is reduced, around town and in heavy traffic then we have to drive accordingly.
#57
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think well be going round in circles here boys...like i said, there will always be those according to whom i was at fault, even though i was able to avoid a collision, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion (i hate that phrase but cant think of a better way of putting it)
#60
Originally Posted by OllyK
We are both saying, "both" are at fault and let it be a lesson to us all to take that bit more care when your view is obscured.
To say he was "at Fault" is putting it a bit stronger than most would agree with - yes he could have been driving even slower than he was - but the ******** not looking would still have just walked into the road without looking and was still putting the kids in danger !