Blue Standard Bugeye left suprised A130/A127
Originally Posted by FirebirdUK
Hehe - if you managed to keep up with a WRX in a French pram, I have to ask - was the WRX being driven by a woman? 

I think that your answer, fortunately is that the driver was a *****! see below.
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=443047
Originally Posted by fromage
Bet you was suprised you could'nt pull away from my ol french clutter from the Roundabout on the A130 to the A127 roundabout, what made it even better was you attempting to wave 'bye' to me when while I managed to stay along side you
You did'nt seem best pleased as I looked over at you when we came onto the A127, you did'nt seem to be giving it then
You did'nt seem best pleased as I looked over at you when we came onto the A127, you did'nt seem to be giving it then

I used to drive a Saxo VTS, which is the same car as a 106 GTi underneath. I now have a bug-eye WRX (standard until recently), so I guess I'm quite well placed to compare the two cars. The WRX wins every time.
The driver was probably in 3rd waiting for the turbo lag to subside.
Anyway, does anybody know how much heavier a bug-eye is than a classic and the relative performance? Didn't realise there was so much difference - might need to buy something older.
The driver was probably in 3rd waiting for the turbo lag to subside.
Anyway, does anybody know how much heavier a bug-eye is than a classic and the relative performance? Didn't realise there was so much difference - might need to buy something older.
Classic is circa 1235kg
WRX (bug eye) is circa 1395kg
Quite a bit of extra weight, certainly 2 average passengers
From my own experience, I followed a new WRX in my classic and had to back off once I had 3rd gear otherwise I would have gone through the back of him.
I think in terms on 0-100 the classic approx 2seconds quicker.
WRX (bug eye) is circa 1395kg
Quite a bit of extra weight, certainly 2 average passengers
From my own experience, I followed a new WRX in my classic and had to back off once I had 3rd gear otherwise I would have gone through the back of him.
I think in terms on 0-100 the classic approx 2seconds quicker.
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by andy99turbo
Classic is circa 1235kg
WRX (bug eye) is circa 1395kg
Quite a bit of extra weight, certainly 2 average passengers
From my own experience, I followed a new WRX in my classic and had to back off once I had 3rd gear otherwise I would have gone through the back of him.
I think in terms on 0-100 the classic approx 2seconds quicker.
WRX (bug eye) is circa 1395kg
Quite a bit of extra weight, certainly 2 average passengers
From my own experience, I followed a new WRX in my classic and had to back off once I had 3rd gear otherwise I would have gone through the back of him.
I think in terms on 0-100 the classic approx 2seconds quicker.
That said, we do have to acknowledge that the far superior refinement and less agressive delivery of the new age cars does disguise their speed somewhat. They are still very brisk cars!
NS04
Originally Posted by fromage
lol check the weight and power of a standard Bugeye WRX and then take in account for 4wd transmission loss and then do the same for a 106GTi and you will see they are pretty equal and 15-80mph speeds are very similar 
But then again bugeye wrx's are the fastest things on the road so was proberly imagining it
Bugeye WRX's are slow fact
I know 106GTi's are'nt super fast but managed to keep up with him while rolling. Standing start obviously different story I would get destroyed.

But then again bugeye wrx's are the fastest things on the road so was proberly imagining it
Bugeye WRX's are slow fact
I know 106GTi's are'nt super fast but managed to keep up with him while rolling. Standing start obviously different story I would get destroyed.
Delusional??
- Excellent - I haven't laughed so much in ages ........ have you ever thought that he couldn't be bothered to waste the petrol??
106 Gti - 120bhp / 1050kg - 115bhp per ton
02 Wrx - 215bhp / 1380kg - 156bhp per ton

Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: The place where indicators don't exist....
You sure the scoob driver wasn't waving you past as he/she was tired of yet another hot hatch stalker..?!
Or maybe they were seeing if they could get past the magic 300 miles out of a tank of fuel..?!! LOL
Or maybe they were seeing if they could get past the magic 300 miles out of a tank of fuel..?!! LOL
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
Jan 11, 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
Dec 14, 2015 08:16 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
Oct 22, 2015 06:12 AM



