Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

for all you mathematician/statisticians

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 September 2004, 03:36 PM
  #31  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sprint Chief
Pah! What a load of rubbish. Didn't really think that through did I?

I remember doing the analysis... and I remember using Poisson... but of course it isn't a Poisson distribution (can't believe you lot didn't spot that)

The distribution is binomial. Each lottery draw is an event and at each event a ball is either drawn or not, with probabilities 6/49 of being drawn or 43/49 of not being drawn.
Its been a while since I have done any statistics, but surely the lottery cannot be a binomial distribution because each ball drawn affects the probability of the next, as there are less ***** left to choose from.

Hence probability of a particular ball being drawn is not 6/49 it is 1/49 or 1/48 or 1/47 depending on how many have already been drawn!

Last edited by ajm; 17 September 2004 at 03:42 PM.
Old 17 September 2004, 03:47 PM
  #32  
Claudius
Scooby Regular
 
Claudius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
Its been a while since I have done any statistics, but surely the lottery cannot be a binomial distribution because each ball drawn affects the probability of the next, as there are less ***** left to choose from.

Hence probability of a particular ball being drawn is not 6/49 it is 1/49 or 1/48 or 1/47 depending on how many have already been drawn!
Yes, but at each draw, the ***** all have the same probability of being selected, so it makes no difference to the end result (not saying you implied that, just pointing it out).
Old 17 September 2004, 03:51 PM
  #33  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think this applies here...


The s-wave Faddeev differential equations for systems Lambda np (for two spin states S=1/2 and S=3/2) and Lambda Lambda alpha are solved numerically on the base of cluster reduction method. The MTI-III potential model is used as the NN interaction. Model Lambda N and Lambda Lambda interaction potentials are set as VLambda N =VNN/2 and VLambda Lambda = 2VNN/3. The Lambda alpha interaction is described by phenomenologycal potentials. It is shown, that such simple models reproduce reasonably the binding energy of hypertriton 3LambdaH (EB=-2.37 MeV) and hypernucleus LambdaLambda6He (EB=-10.88 MeV). For doublet and quadruplet Lambda-d and Lambda-{Lambda5}He scattering the effective range expansion parameters are calculated. The similarity between Lambda -{Lambda5}He and n-d systems is discussed.

Old 17 September 2004, 03:55 PM
  #34  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Claudius
Yes, but at each draw, the ***** all have the same probability of being selected, so it makes no difference to the end result (not saying you implied that, just pointing it out).
Yes, I was just asking a techie question of Sprint_Chief

Obviously none of this stuff changes the fact that you cannot predict which ***** are going to come up!
Old 17 September 2004, 04:01 PM
  #35  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
Yes, I was just asking a techie question of Sprint_Chief

Obviously none of this stuff changes the fact that you cannot predict which ***** are going to come up!
I predict It wont be mine or yours this weekend.

Hope I'm wrong .
Old 17 September 2004, 04:11 PM
  #36  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasey
I predict It wont be mine or yours this weekend.

Hope I'm wrong .
Well in my case there is 100% chance you are right, because I never enter the godforsaken thing!

(although theoretically I suppose there is an infinitessimally small chance I may enter by mistake! )
Old 17 September 2004, 04:12 PM
  #37  
Sprint Chief
Scooby Regular
 
Sprint Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi ajm

No, this isn't the case. You are considering a single number coming out of the machine as an event - I am considering the event to be whether a number is one of the six drawn as a single event. If you see it like this, each number is equally likely to be one of the six and unaffected by the draw order etc.
Old 17 September 2004, 04:14 PM
  #38  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sprint Chief
Hi ajm

No, this isn't the case. You are considering a single number coming out of the machine as an event - I am considering the event to be whether a number is one of the six drawn as a single event. If you see it like this, each number is equally likely to be one of the six and unaffected by the draw order etc.
Ah, I see!
Old 17 September 2004, 04:15 PM
  #39  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've said it once, I'll say it again:

It's all a load of *****!!

Old 17 September 2004, 04:16 PM
  #40  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
Well in my case there is 100% chance you are right, because I never enter the godforsaken thing!

(although theoretically I suppose there is an infinitessimally small chance I may enter by mistake! )
Go on - get yourself a lucky dip - I feel Lucky for ya

ps all you do is walk into the shop and say "Lucky dip for tonight please" - Six lovely random numbers and no Lambda(np-3)'s anywhere to be seen.
Old 17 September 2004, 04:17 PM
  #41  
Sprint Chief
Scooby Regular
 
Sprint Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Blimey a lot of other posts got squeezed in there! I got a bit distracted so there was a delay between typing the post and actually submitting it! Claudius gave the right answer though, glad someone is keeping up

Jasey m8 I think you'll find the reverse tangential coefficient of your multi dimensional hypercube has not been recalibrated correctly against the third hypothesis as laid down by Einstein in his paper Maths for dummies. You want to check that
Old 17 September 2004, 04:18 PM
  #42  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sprint Chief
Blimey a lot of other posts got squeezed in there! I got a bit distracted so there was a delay between typing the post and actually submitting it! Claudius gave the right answer though, glad someone is keeping up

Jasey m8 I think you'll find the reverse tangential coefficient of your multi dimensional hypercube has not been recalibrated correctly against the third hypothesis as laid down by Einstein in his paper Maths for dummies. You want to check that
Got a Link
Old 17 September 2004, 04:21 PM
  #43  
Sprint Chief
Scooby Regular
 
Sprint Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think a link would help understand it, I find ten or eleven pints usually makes things *much* clearer.
Old 17 September 2004, 04:22 PM
  #44  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so the larger numbered ***** arent heavier cos they have more ink on them and gravitate to the bottom?
Old 17 September 2004, 04:24 PM
  #45  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
so the larger numbered ***** arent heavier cos they have more ink on them and gravitate to the bottom?
That's this bit "LambdaLambda6He (EB=-10.88 MeV). " of my formula - Well spotted
Old 17 September 2004, 04:29 PM
  #46  
Jerome
Scooby Regular
 
Jerome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To throw a different slant on this, on the very first lottery, I did 6 lines and didn't pick the same number twice. Not a single number came up in the draw. What is the probability of this happening?
Old 17 September 2004, 04:39 PM
  #47  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jerome
To throw a different slant on this, on the very first lottery, I did 6 lines and didn't pick the same number twice. Not a single number came up in the draw. What is the probability of this happening?
Just think - If you'd done two more you'd probably be a millionaire .
Old 17 September 2004, 04:49 PM
  #48  
Sprint Chief
Scooby Regular
 
Sprint Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jerome

Probability of picking 36 numbers and not one of them coming up:

Probability of first number out of the machine not coming up is 13/49
second number 12/48
third number 11/47
fourth number 10/46
fifth number 9/45
sixth number 8/44

The product of these gives you the odds

Comes to be approx 0.012% or approx thousand to one

If you did a couple more you'd almost certainly have twenty quid to your name anyway




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 AM.