Well, yes it is. They may be fine parents but the bullying would be a major obstacle.

Cutting a long story short that is exactly what I've said.

You iz fick.

 

FB, for what it's worth (the paper Scoobynet is printed on...): if you could have tapped my house you would have heard me & my wife say the same thing: "kids, pah, selfish".

We do however compensate with having loads of pets and taking extremely good care of them, and deep down we know we were just chickening out (for various reasons private to us).

 

Knobby. lol. Quality.

 

As a man who was talking about boot camp earlier today, I'd keep quiet!

 

98% of gay couples (wild guess) think adopting a straight child is morally wrong.

Gee if you are going to come out with statistics, at leats have something to back them up rather than just SWAG.

 

my comment for those that care!

if FB belives that every mum to be is doing something "wicked" then i stand by my suggestion!

i could also find a load of mums to be push him if he needs help

 

99% of my posts are spot on (wild guess) so there!

 

Olly, watch that cat ! Flowerbed alert

If you care to read I was the first in this thread to point out that gay couples may object to having kids too.

If you doubt my numbers, that's your right. I'd be truly amazed if I would be even 50 % off, but there you go.

You did spoil the fun I had in this thread though, ta.

Edit: backing up: Masters & Johnson

 

It's not an ideal world, the whole idea is out of order, ergo you're against it. That's very different from Tel's point, and I'm afraid demonstrates yet again that if one of us is thick, it's not me.

 

THE WHOLE IDEA IS OUT OF ORDER BIG TIME.

Yes, in the world in which we live.

....and you have a go at me for making assumptions.

 

Er, I'm using your quotes. You're saying you're against the concept in the world in which we live. I'm saying I'm not. Tel is supportive of the idea but is worried over the bullying. I agree with him.

My point is that I am not against the concept of gay parenting "in the world in which we live". You are.

Who iz fick?

 

Like a silly school boy. Amazing.

The difference is the bullying can't and won't be stopped. This is pointless. You are just a typical SN argumentative noddy.

 

What was that you were saying about arrogance earlier?

 

http://www.avert.org/hsexu1.htm

 

Noddy wasn't designed as an insult, more a statement of fact. You're one of these wind ups who thrives on disagreeing with someone, anyone, as long as you can. Noddy is apt ; as opposed to insulting.

 

Marriage is a union of two people who have chosen to spend the rest of their lives in matrimony.

Pushing the religious reasons aside, because not all of us believe in it, marriage should be open to all those seeking that ultimate confirmation of commitment.

It is unfair to suggest that a couple of the same sex are not adequate to bring up children as a couple. It is a damn shame the law cannot be so choosy when it comes to female floozy's!

Like anything, the human race moves on and things that were unheard of 50 years ago are now embraced as normal - whatever normal is.

Hooray for gay relationships, marriages and families. Boo to those who cannot accept the changes in society as the years roll by.

 

Yet again, you're assuming, assuming, assuming.

It may astonish you to realise that others (of whom I am one) fundamentally disagree with what you say. Live with it. It'll happen through life.

I'm disagreeing because I think you're wrong, have poorly-formed views, and can substantiate little of what you say, not because of a desire to argue per se.

 

I told her to type that you know...


Shhhh!!!!

 

Hypocritical as well as a "skim through post" reader.

I'm bored now. Leave it. Have your last say if you really wish.

 

No you never.. I thought of that all by myself

 

Can't be true Telboy as it makes sense

 

PAH!!

 

Thank you!!!

So in a survey by a gay and lesbian organisation we have about 8.4% of males that have "Ever had a sexual experience, not necessarily including genital contact, with a partner of the same sex?" and about 9.7% for women.

I haven't read it in full detail to see if the above "experience" includes "hugging" or "kissing". When you get on to genital contact it drops to 6.3% and 5.7% respectively.

Now what do you term as gay? If you have had a gay experience, does that mean you ARE gay or just you have had an experience??

Anyway assuming that EVERYBODY that has had a gay experience is STILL gay and they ALL had children, then SomeDude - you are still overestimating.

I wonder how many of those 6.3% of men, consider themself gay. Of those that do I wonder how many of them have kids?? I think it is reasonable to say that you guess was wildly out and if it is 1.5% I would be surprised.

 

to TelBoy

Just as a quick addage, it is obviously not important to have an opposite sex in the same family when rearing children, otherwise single-parented kiddies would show signs of being socially damaged... and they are not. Not from being reared by one parent so would not from being reared by two parents of the same sex.

 

Olly, read the posts. Thanks

 

Careful girl !

 

I think to be GAY means you are drawn to your same sex in the attraction sense.

Many people have same-sex sexual experiences but that doesn't denote that they are gay, just that they have tried something different.

 

I'm suffering from a common sense overload here. I need a lie-down!!

 

Dont come round here with your sensible comments. they're not welcome.

save yourself some time and effort by walking up to the nearest wall and repeatedly bang your head against it.

 

Sorry did I miss your admission that your guess was widley innacurate??