Can't Believe the People I Work With
BANNED
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 0
Your blatantly a bit of a silly cow for even considering asking for an apology. Considering you hang around on the muppets forum I imagine your the type of person who gets the **** taken out of at work quite alot, along with the rest of you muppets.
Get used to it.
Get used to it.
and NO, I'm not going to apologise! 
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
YOu want to find yourself an article with people getting fired about this type of thing.... and email it back to the respective persons 
All of a sudden the joke becomes very stale. You could do it so your "Co-Workers" are not sure about your level of seriousness...
The following article is not totally relevant, but a quick search could find something. The following was talking about the top 2o Times careers that were ended....
PS... if you get a million, I would like a free tank of petrol
"Why are the Times and other companies so concerned about e-mail? One reason is their liability in harassment suits. One or two explicit e-mail messages typically aren’t enough by themselves to prove that a workplace environment was hostile. But such e-mail can bolster other damaging evidence. At a subsidiary of Chevron Corp., e-mail containing such jokes as '25 reasons beer is better than women' were used along with other evidence in a sexual-harassment claim that was settled in 1995 for $2.2 million." (Ann Cairns, "That bawdy e-mail was good for a laugh — until the ax fell", MSNBC (highlights from WSJ.com), Feb. 4, link now dead). Also see Lisa Fried, "Employers Crack Down on Personal Internet Use", New York Law Journal, Jan. 3; Christine A. Amalfe and Kerrie R. Heslin, "Courts start to rule on online harassment", National Law Journal, Jan. 24).
All of a sudden the joke becomes very stale. You could do it so your "Co-Workers" are not sure about your level of seriousness...
The following article is not totally relevant, but a quick search could find something. The following was talking about the top 2o Times careers that were ended....
PS... if you get a million, I would like a free tank of petrol
"Why are the Times and other companies so concerned about e-mail? One reason is their liability in harassment suits. One or two explicit e-mail messages typically aren’t enough by themselves to prove that a workplace environment was hostile. But such e-mail can bolster other damaging evidence. At a subsidiary of Chevron Corp., e-mail containing such jokes as '25 reasons beer is better than women' were used along with other evidence in a sexual-harassment claim that was settled in 1995 for $2.2 million." (Ann Cairns, "That bawdy e-mail was good for a laugh — until the ax fell", MSNBC (highlights from WSJ.com), Feb. 4, link now dead). Also see Lisa Fried, "Employers Crack Down on Personal Internet Use", New York Law Journal, Jan. 3; Christine A. Amalfe and Kerrie R. Heslin, "Courts start to rule on online harassment", National Law Journal, Jan. 24).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
Jan 11, 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
Aug 5, 2018 07:02 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
Dec 14, 2015 08:16 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
Oct 22, 2015 06:12 AM