And another lone wolf....
#31
No I'd say that being unhinged is easily spotted. A series of rambling, intellectually incoherent statements, usually containing some sort of half-arsed conspiracy usually gives it away.
According to your statements there are only 3 types of people, terrorists, liberals and (I guess) people like you. I must admit it's difficult to know where I fit in, liberal I guess but that's not really how I've ever seen myself. I prefer moderate.
According to your statements there are only 3 types of people, terrorists, liberals and (I guess) people like you. I must admit it's difficult to know where I fit in, liberal I guess but that's not really how I've ever seen myself. I prefer moderate.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/789720/Explosion-bomb-Egypt-kills-four-people-and-injures-20-near-church-in-Tanta-terrorism
Do you agree there is propaganda on both sides?
Do you agree both are causing a divide?
Do you agree there is more left wing media than right?
Do you agree hashtags of 'together' achieve nothing?
But hey, if asking that both sides see the middle as being where the real truth lies, as in truths and untruths on both sides and that's where I see progression coming from, then please feel free to call me unhinged.
#34
And in what part of me saying the extreme right are mental does it say I agree with them?
You liberals literally cannot see or read what's right in front of your face pmsl.
Believe it or not I do have some answers, or a different approach. But the first stage of that would be liberals accepting their responsibility, being able to listen to a reasonable arguement without dismissing it before it's even started, or (and this is the bit you'll definitely struggle with) actually reading what is written without reading between the lines.
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can't answer questions, misquote trump and now misquote me.
And in what part of me saying the extreme right are mental does it say I agree with them?
You liberals literally cannot see or read what's right in front of your face pmsl.
Believe it or not I do have some answers, or a different approach. But the first stage of that would be liberals accepting their responsibility, being able to listen to a reasonable arguement without dismissing it before it's even started, or (and this is the bit you'll definitely struggle with) actually reading what is written without reading between the lines.
And in what part of me saying the extreme right are mental does it say I agree with them?
You liberals literally cannot see or read what's right in front of your face pmsl.
Believe it or not I do have some answers, or a different approach. But the first stage of that would be liberals accepting their responsibility, being able to listen to a reasonable arguement without dismissing it before it's even started, or (and this is the bit you'll definitely struggle with) actually reading what is written without reading between the lines.
WTF?
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Call me unhinged, I'm not the problem as you can another lone wolf has targeted christians in Cairo
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...anta-terrorism
Do you agree there is propaganda on both sides?
Do you agree both are causing a divide?
Do you agree there is more left wing media than right?
Do you agree hashtags of 'together' achieve nothing?
But hey, if asking that both sides see the middle as being where the real truth lies, as in truths and untruths on both sides and that's where I see progression coming from, then please feel free to call me unhinged.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...anta-terrorism
Do you agree there is propaganda on both sides?
Do you agree both are causing a divide?
Do you agree there is more left wing media than right?
Do you agree hashtags of 'together' achieve nothing?
But hey, if asking that both sides see the middle as being where the real truth lies, as in truths and untruths on both sides and that's where I see progression coming from, then please feel free to call me unhinged.
My answers to your 4 questions are...
1. Which sides do you mean?
2. Can't answer that without understand what you meant in your first question
3. I think there is plenty of both. Mainstream is tilted to the left overall, digital is titled to the right
4. I have absolutely no idea what #together is
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
That event in February was some hoodlum attempting burn down an asylum house,
probably
or something completely spurious otherwise to support his anti immigration stance
probably
or something completely spurious otherwise to support his anti immigration stance
#40
His actual words were 'what happened in sweden' referring to a documentary on Fox News by Tucker Carlson on Sweden.
The media whipped up a frenzy of 'trump makes up terror attack in Sweden' headlines and people like you believed it, and have done up until now. It's taken someone with an open mind to tell you it wasn't said before you'd actually believe it.
Highlighting my point that the media have duped you like a trained monkey and many many others.
#41
My answers to your 4 questions are...
1. Which sides do you mean?
2. Can't answer that without understand what you meant in your first question
3. I think there is plenty of both. Mainstream is tilted to the left overall, digital is titled to the right
4. I have absolutely no idea what #together is
1. Which sides do you mean?
2. Can't answer that without understand what you meant in your first question
3. I think there is plenty of both. Mainstream is tilted to the left overall, digital is titled to the right
4. I have absolutely no idea what #together is
Youre incorrect, digital media's biggest comtributors would be the BBC, sky, itv, CNN when it comes to news.
The exposure of CNN's fake news should give you an idea of how liberal social media is.
Facebook bans right wing groups on a daily basis. A group called Libtard showed violent liberals attacking trump supporters and was quickly removed. Milo has been deleted from twitter and Facebook repeatedly.
Groups like Britains First are minute. Although I avoid them I have seen first hand people arguing over the fact another person had 'liked' britains first. But liberals love free speech don't though?.
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
But you said 'He obviously did' make up a terror attack in Sweden.
His actual words were 'what happened in sweden' referring to a documentary on Fox News by Tucker Carlson on Sweden.
The media whipped up a frenzy of 'trump makes up terror attack in Sweden' headlines and people like you believed it, and have done up until now. It's taken someone with an open mind to tell you it wasn't said before you'd actually believe it.
Highlighting my point that the media have duped you like a trained monkey and many many others.
His actual words were 'what happened in sweden' referring to a documentary on Fox News by Tucker Carlson on Sweden.
The media whipped up a frenzy of 'trump makes up terror attack in Sweden' headlines and people like you believed it, and have done up until now. It's taken someone with an open mind to tell you it wasn't said before you'd actually believe it.
Highlighting my point that the media have duped you like a trained monkey and many many others.
Personally I delve into all that social media ****e so wouldn't know what goes on
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
Its the rise social media , for which youre clearly a devotee, which has given airtime to radical groups around the world including ISIS , just imagine how much better these poor saps lives would have been without the internet 20 years ago
#47
I think if you read what I've said you'll get that I lean towards a similar point of view in the evils of social media and main stream media. There really isn't much difference.
You do realise a lot of trumps tweets aren't actually real? you do realise it's simple to photoshop his username and make a funny 'tweet'. One the other day said 'Hey Assad, duck!'. Please tell me you realise that wasn't actually him.
And I'm not a devotee of social media. Facebook is good for keeping in contact with people, organising events, looking at cars from around the world and funny video's.
But the media's intrusion, it's manipulation (of which you are a devotee) of people or attempts to manipulate people using social media are dividing people further. Hence my statement of #together being bull****.
As for medication, well it's been established that you are easily manipulated by the media and have made errors in your judgement based upon innacurate headlines. I obviously see things a little clearer than you, so any medication I'm on would be a great help to you.
You do realise a lot of trumps tweets aren't actually real? you do realise it's simple to photoshop his username and make a funny 'tweet'. One the other day said 'Hey Assad, duck!'. Please tell me you realise that wasn't actually him.
And I'm not a devotee of social media. Facebook is good for keeping in contact with people, organising events, looking at cars from around the world and funny video's.
But the media's intrusion, it's manipulation (of which you are a devotee) of people or attempts to manipulate people using social media are dividing people further. Hence my statement of #together being bull****.
As for medication, well it's been established that you are easily manipulated by the media and have made errors in your judgement based upon innacurate headlines. I obviously see things a little clearer than you, so any medication I'm on would be a great help to you.
#54
Started what?
I think you need to look back at your own posts. Multiple, once sentence replies to one post. Significant side stepping of questions you simply can't answer. The complete moronic mistake you made believing headlines without reading further.
But you know all about the media, even though you 'don't do' social media (probably a good idea considering your lack of an adult level of intelligence).
And you know all about Crawley, because you read an article, that you couldn't provide a link to but have never been.
I think you need to look back at your own posts. Multiple, once sentence replies to one post. Significant side stepping of questions you simply can't answer. The complete moronic mistake you made believing headlines without reading further.
But you know all about the media, even though you 'don't do' social media (probably a good idea considering your lack of an adult level of intelligence).
And you know all about Crawley, because you read an article, that you couldn't provide a link to but have never been.
Last edited by Kwik; 10 April 2017 at 06:01 PM.