View Poll Results: How will you vote in the EU referendum?
Voters: 255. You may not vote on this poll
EU Referendum
Your comments speak volumes about your intelligence. The UK population is pretty static / v low growth without immigration. The problem IS mass immigration. I am not going to ignore it for the moment.
Importing a set of people who at best think we are Kaffur IS destroying the country. See Rotherham, Oxford, Telford, Rochdale, et al for details
Importing a set of people who at best think we are Kaffur IS destroying the country. See Rotherham, Oxford, Telford, Rochdale, et al for details
In the case that a newly Brexit Gvmt decides to maintain uncontrolled immigration, yes that would happen. Back on planet Earth however, you're another idiot
Your comments speak volumes about your intelligence. The UK population is pretty static / v low growth without immigration. The problem IS mass immigration. I am not going to ignore it for the moment.
Importing a set of people who at best think we are Kaffur IS destroying the country. See Rotherham, Oxford, Telford, Rochdale, et al for details
Importing a set of people who at best think we are Kaffur IS destroying the country. See Rotherham, Oxford, Telford, Rochdale, et al for details
You are ignoring the demographic timebomb though...the population is aging and so we need (and will continue to need) millions of migrant workers over the coming decades. Why don't you mention that, given your superior intellect?
Last edited by Martin2005; Jun 7, 2016 at 04:22 PM.
Because they're British, not filthy Muslims! Isn't that obvious..........?
old people will have to stay in work, or work longer hours doing harder jobs
why cant people start work at 12, 13 or 14 - pointless getting an education these days
the Brexiters see progress as taking the country back to the 1860's
back to the future
Last edited by hodgy0_2; Jun 7, 2016 at 04:49 PM.

It doesn't however change the fact, that you choose to ignore, that we already have controlled immigration for non-EU immigrants, with an Australian style points system, yet still the migrant numbers are not falling because the economy is currently demanding more workers than the domestic and EU population can supply.
Migration is not going to drop just because we leave the EU (unless the economy collapses), so I'd much rather have EU migrants with more similar cultures to ours than non-EU migrants!
You're welcome to call me an idiot if it makes you feel better about loosing an argument 
It doesn't however change the fact, that you choose to ignore, that we already have controlled immigration for non-EU immigrants, with an Australian style points system, yet still the migrant numbers are not falling because the economy is currently demanding more workers than the domestic and EU population can supply.

It doesn't however change the fact, that you choose to ignore, that we already have controlled immigration for non-EU immigrants, with an Australian style points system, yet still the migrant numbers are not falling because the economy is currently demanding more workers than the domestic and EU population can supply.
However the Gvmt has a current commitment to reducing overall immigration to "tens of thousands". As he cant control EU immigration, you would think he would make headway on that front. He failed at that too. The more intelligent question is given his commitment and power to influence non-EU immigration, why has he not done so? Not sure this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36149185 supports your argument that its economic growth...
You're a stranger to reason. Increased restriction means decreased numbers. Or are you talking about illegals in Dymchurch?
Last edited by warrenm2; Jun 7, 2016 at 05:05 PM.
You misunderstand (quelle surprise). The non EU immigration that Cameron could control as you correctly say, is not falling. Agreed. People get in because the current criteria allow them in (eg join family members) and the Gvmt grants them permission to enter.
However the Gvmt has a current commitment to reducing overall immigration to "tens of thousands". As he cant control EU immigration, you would think he would make headway on that front. He failed at that too. The more intelligent question is given his commitment and power to influence non-EU immigration, why has he not done so? Not sure this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36149185 supports your argument that its economic growth...
You're a stranger to reason. Increased restriction means decreased numbers. Or are you talking about illegals in Dymchurch?
However the Gvmt has a current commitment to reducing overall immigration to "tens of thousands". As he cant control EU immigration, you would think he would make headway on that front. He failed at that too. The more intelligent question is given his commitment and power to influence non-EU immigration, why has he not done so? Not sure this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36149185 supports your argument that its economic growth...
You're a stranger to reason. Increased restriction means decreased numbers. Or are you talking about illegals in Dymchurch?
But the economy is demanding more numbers, even your own selective articles states that the service sector (where most immigrants work) continues to boom.
There are something like 700k unfilled vacancies right now, your idea would seem to be to quadruple that number - what would that do to economic growth?
You misunderstand (quelle surprise). The non EU immigration that Cameron could control as you correctly say, is not falling. Agreed. People get in because the current criteria allow them in (eg join family members) and the Gvmt grants them permission to enter.
However the Gvmt has a current commitment to reducing overall immigration to "tens of thousands". As he cant control EU immigration, you would think he would make headway on that front. He failed at that too. The more intelligent question is given his commitment and power to influence non-EU immigration, why has he not done so? Not sure this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36149185 supports your argument that its economic growth...
You're a stranger to reason. Increased restriction means decreased numbers. Or are you talking about illegals in Dymchurch?
However the Gvmt has a current commitment to reducing overall immigration to "tens of thousands". As he cant control EU immigration, you would think he would make headway on that front. He failed at that too. The more intelligent question is given his commitment and power to influence non-EU immigration, why has he not done so? Not sure this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36149185 supports your argument that its economic growth...
You're a stranger to reason. Increased restriction means decreased numbers. Or are you talking about illegals in Dymchurch?
Assuming growth continues, then migration will continue. If growth falls then migration will also fall as the controls on non-EU migrants kick-in and EU migrants will also drop due to the fall in available jobs!
If EU migration was driven by the benefits system, everyone would be heading to Sweden which has a much better benefit system than the UK. EU migrants are almost exclusively driven by the economy and will ebb and flow as the economies of the EU members grow and decline. Non-EU migration is partly also driven by the economy, but much more from people escaping a poor quality of life in their home countries.
The point is, gaining control over EU migration doesn't mean that there will be a reduction in overall migration, as the main driving factor for migration
is the economy! Migration would have to fall massively before uncontrolled EU migration becomes the real migration problem!
As for illegal immigrants and asylum seekers/refugees, that is a whole other issue that is also irrelevant to EU membership.
We already introduced increased restriction (to non-EU migrants) and there is no decreased numbers. As you point out, the power to decrease is there, yet they have not decreased the numbers due to the economic growth!
Assuming growth continues, then migration will continue. If growth falls then migration will also fall as the controls on non-EU migrants kick-in and EU migrants will also drop due to the fall in available jobs!
If EU migration was driven by the benefits system, everyone would be heading to Sweden which has a much better benefit system than the UK. EU migrants are almost exclusively driven by the economy and will ebb and flow as the economies of the EU members grow and decline. Non-EU migration is partly also driven by the economy, but much more from people escaping a poor quality of life in their home countries.
The point is, gaining control over EU migration doesn't mean that there will be a reduction in overall migration, as the main driving factor for migration
is the economy! Migration would have to fall massively before uncontrolled EU migration becomes the real migration problem!
As for illegal immigrants and asylum seekers/refugees, that is a whole other issue that is also irrelevant to EU membership.
Assuming growth continues, then migration will continue. If growth falls then migration will also fall as the controls on non-EU migrants kick-in and EU migrants will also drop due to the fall in available jobs!
If EU migration was driven by the benefits system, everyone would be heading to Sweden which has a much better benefit system than the UK. EU migrants are almost exclusively driven by the economy and will ebb and flow as the economies of the EU members grow and decline. Non-EU migration is partly also driven by the economy, but much more from people escaping a poor quality of life in their home countries.
The point is, gaining control over EU migration doesn't mean that there will be a reduction in overall migration, as the main driving factor for migration
is the economy! Migration would have to fall massively before uncontrolled EU migration becomes the real migration problem!
As for illegal immigrants and asylum seekers/refugees, that is a whole other issue that is also irrelevant to EU membership.
QED - leave the EU, therefore crash the economy, then we won't have any immigration. We'd then have 'taken back control' over the migrant free graveyard we've created

Do you think secretly Warren actually gets this, or is he really that blinded by ideology?
Last edited by Martin2005; Jun 7, 2016 at 05:48 PM.
i cant wait to vote out
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
....just saying...
absolutely not.
mass eastern european migration has ruined communities over here and has a strain on schools nhs etc.
im old enough to remember before we were over run with them.
you cannot walk down the street nowadays without seeing some pole wearing an 80s tracksuit spitting and drinking.
ill gladly take all the downsides although i think its cammoron scare mongering if it stops any more economic migrants moving here.
bring in the points system like aus
mass eastern european migration has ruined communities over here and has a strain on schools nhs etc.
im old enough to remember before we were over run with them.
you cannot walk down the street nowadays without seeing some pole wearing an 80s tracksuit spitting and drinking.
ill gladly take all the downsides although i think its cammoron scare mongering if it stops any more economic migrants moving here.
bring in the points system like aus
absolutely not.
mass eastern european migration has ruined communities over here and has a strain on schools nhs etc.
im old enough to remember before we were over run with them.
you cannot walk down the street nowadays without seeing some pole wearing an 80s tracksuit spitting and drinking.
ill gladly take all the downsides although i think its cammoron scare mongering if it stops any more economic migrants moving here.
bring in the points system like aus
mass eastern european migration has ruined communities over here and has a strain on schools nhs etc.
im old enough to remember before we were over run with them.
you cannot walk down the street nowadays without seeing some pole wearing an 80s tracksuit spitting and drinking.
ill gladly take all the downsides although i think its cammoron scare mongering if it stops any more economic migrants moving here.
bring in the points system like aus
As has already been pointed out, we already have such a system
The Poles you so dislike aren't going to leave just because we vote out - you do understand that, right?
Last edited by Martin2005; Jun 7, 2016 at 05:57 PM.
but by leaving the eu the uk is not such an attractive prospect to get free houses and benefits so more wont come.
i have seen zero benefits from being in the eu so far and most peoples biggest gripe is not the millions it costs everyday its the damage being done to their communities,schools streets etc by mass immigration.
this is the reason most will vote to leave and i honestly cant wait.
oh i do have gripes with EASTERN EUROPEANS spitting drinking and being anti social on streets and before you say im fully aware uk citizens do this too but we cant get rid of them.
Last edited by fat-thomas; Jun 7, 2016 at 06:04 PM.
Question for the leavers:
If the leave campaign were to lay out their economic plan and they said its either EEA (Norway) or EFTA (Swiss) both of which mean we still have to pay the EU and have no control on EU migration and no vote in EU matters which still affect us.
Would you still vote to leave?
Then ask yourself the question; why are the leave campaign not spelling out their economic plan?
If the leave campaign were to lay out their economic plan and they said its either EEA (Norway) or EFTA (Swiss) both of which mean we still have to pay the EU and have no control on EU migration and no vote in EU matters which still affect us.
Would you still vote to leave?
Then ask yourself the question; why are the leave campaign not spelling out their economic plan?
Question for the leavers:
If the leave campaign were to lay out their economic plan and they said its either EEA (Norway) or EFTA (Swiss) both of which mean we still have to pay the EU and have no control on EU migration and no vote in EU matters which still affect us.
Would you still vote to leave?
Then ask yourself the question; why are the leave campaign not spelling out their economic plan?
If the leave campaign were to lay out their economic plan and they said its either EEA (Norway) or EFTA (Swiss) both of which mean we still have to pay the EU and have no control on EU migration and no vote in EU matters which still affect us.
Would you still vote to leave?
Then ask yourself the question; why are the leave campaign not spelling out their economic plan?
absolutely not.
mass eastern european migration has ruined communities over here and has a strain on schools nhs etc.
im old enough to remember before we were over run with them.
you cannot walk down the street nowadays without seeing some pole wearing an 80s tracksuit spitting and drinking.
ill gladly take all the downsides although i think its cammoron scare mongering if it stops any more economic migrants moving here.
bring in the points system like aus
mass eastern european migration has ruined communities over here and has a strain on schools nhs etc.
im old enough to remember before we were over run with them.
you cannot walk down the street nowadays without seeing some pole wearing an 80s tracksuit spitting and drinking.
ill gladly take all the downsides although i think its cammoron scare mongering if it stops any more economic migrants moving here.
bring in the points system like aus
no but the migration will not be in the hands of the eu anymore so that wins my vote.
a maybe is better than a no, as said my no.1 gripe is immigration the rest ill take my chances on as so far it has had neither positive or negative effect on my life.
a maybe is better than a no, as said my no.1 gripe is immigration the rest ill take my chances on as so far it has had neither positive or negative effect on my life.
That kind of depends on what kind of Brexit we want / achieve
bqck home the issues with the eu are the same anyway.
im not against migration,im against mass migration.
go to a town like boston and see what it has done.
Also, the fact that there are 2.8m EU migrants in the UK and 2.2m British people living within the EU, the net EU migration level is not really a problem!
Now the leave campaigns immigration plan is 100% dependent on the post Brexit economic plan. Without an economic plan, the leave campaigns immigration plan is next to worthless!
The remain campaign believe that EU migration is economically driven and therefore migration will reduce when the EU economies recover. They accept that current migration cannot be reduced due to economic demand and EU migration does not fulfil the demand. There is already a points based system to control non-EU migration and can be used to reduce migration at any point they need to, but given the current economic situation, it currently cannot be reduced without slowing growth.
Also, the fact that there are 2.8m EU migrants in the UK and 2.2m British people living within the EU, the net EU migration level is not really a problem!
Now the leave campaigns immigration plan is 100% dependent on the post Brexit economic plan. Without an economic plan, the leave campaigns immigration plan is next to worthless!
Also, the fact that there are 2.8m EU migrants in the UK and 2.2m British people living within the EU, the net EU migration level is not really a problem!
Now the leave campaigns immigration plan is 100% dependent on the post Brexit economic plan. Without an economic plan, the leave campaigns immigration plan is next to worthless!
the speculation waffle doesnt concern me.
also a big plus if the vote goes brexit is cammoron might resign




















