When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Applies just as well to the other side of the argument.
To an extent, yes. Along with the 'Playing chess against a pigeon' scenario. But it doesn't have the same validity when it comes down to answering simple, logical questions with a simple, logical answer.
To an extent, yes. Along with the 'Playing chess against a pigeon' scenario. But it doesn't have the same validity when it comes down to answering simple, logical questions with a simple, logical answer.
I like that analogy, i don't think I've heard that one before.
Thing is no one on either side really answers the questions, go back through this thread and all you see is people bickering over who should actually answer the question.
Firstly, Americans shout too much for my liking to deliver the simplest of the messages. Very annoying and hardly impressive. Secondly, this sort of speech sounds dated and would enthuse those backwards that are stuck in well bygone gay criminalising yesteryears, not the people of this day and age. If the Christians of today feel so positively rocked by such speech, then it goes to show where the Bible (even for the born again) still must be resting. Under the rock, it must be.
I don't and that's owing to the Fermi paradox. I suspect you're going to answer to the contrary and that having attempted to prove your hypothesis you'll wish to demonstrate how the existence of said aliens disproves the truth of Christianity. In anticipation, even if intelligent life did exist elsewhere in the universe, whilst the foundations of the Bible would be rocked, it would remain standing.