View Poll Results: Should we end prohibition on Cannabis #420
Yes
31
55.36%
No
25
44.64%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll
#420 Should we end prohibition on Cannabis
#32
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
#35
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
If anyone's interested in markets this is really interesting.
https://blog.openbazaar.org/openbaza...o-is-released/
Try to forget the association with drugs and hitmen, this and Bitcoin opens business to anyone with a raspberry pie, internet and something to sell.
https://blog.openbazaar.org/openbaza...o-is-released/
Try to forget the association with drugs and hitmen, this and Bitcoin opens business to anyone with a raspberry pie, internet and something to sell.
#36
Scooby Regular
Cannabis may have some limited use for certain applications in medicine but I've always been quite sceptical about its use in pain relief, studies have never really concluded favourably in its analgesic properties.
There have been some conflicting studies over the years about how dangerous it is physiologically but the general consensus is that it's generally at least as bad as smoking tobacco, and due to the way it is smoked (no filter, packed rollup) it is considered by many to be more dangerous, and I would agree based on experience.
What is not in doubt is the drug's affect on the psychological state, and long term use is certainly detrimental and potentially very bad for those with underlying disorders.
I've seen some very misinformed posts about cannabis use on social media, anyone who thinks that smoking the stuff is benefitting in any way is clearly well baked.
I would not support it being legalised, even if I can appreciate that some people feel they should be allowed to responsibly.
There have been some conflicting studies over the years about how dangerous it is physiologically but the general consensus is that it's generally at least as bad as smoking tobacco, and due to the way it is smoked (no filter, packed rollup) it is considered by many to be more dangerous, and I would agree based on experience.
What is not in doubt is the drug's affect on the psychological state, and long term use is certainly detrimental and potentially very bad for those with underlying disorders.
I've seen some very misinformed posts about cannabis use on social media, anyone who thinks that smoking the stuff is benefitting in any way is clearly well baked.
I would not support it being legalised, even if I can appreciate that some people feel they should be allowed to responsibly.
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
I'm under no illusions at all that cannabis has the potential for quite serious negative health effects, even if only among the unlucky few, but I'd support legalization on the basis that the law enforcement and other resources consumed in trying to combat its use would be far better deployed elsewhere, with one condition. A law is brought in beforehand making it a specific and strictly enforced offense to supply it to anyone under 18, punishable by five years or more in prison even for small amounts.
#39
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
I'm under no illusions at all that cannabis has the potential for quite serious negative health effects, even if only among the unlucky few, but I'd support legalization on the basis that the law enforcement and other resources consumed in trying to combat its use would be far better deployed elsewhere, with one condition. A law is brought in beforehand making it a specific and strictly enforced offense to supply it to anyone under 18, punishable by five years or more in prison even for small amounts.
Smoking is bad full stop. Which is why you get one of these
#40
I'm not a smoker and have no experience of vaporisers. But as I understand, whilst vapourisers are "safer" due to lack of smoke from combustion, no body knows the long term effects of such devices for getting your nicotine hit. Whilst the tobacco industry is heavily regulated, the manufacture and sale of vapourisers and the chemicals in nicotine oils etc are not, right? Wouldn't the regulation of cannabis follow the same route as tobacco with regards to vapourisers?
Besides, vapourisers still doesn't address the underlying issue of cannabis. Smoking cannabis has the same phisiological effects as with tobacco, but also the additional psychological issues with short term and prolonged use.
Besides, vapourisers still doesn't address the underlying issue of cannabis. Smoking cannabis has the same phisiological effects as with tobacco, but also the additional psychological issues with short term and prolonged use.
#42
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Ask any psychiatric department how many of there current patient list are habitual cannabis or have been THC based drugs users and the figures are stark = most of them. If you know how THC works you will understand why so many "stoners" are in such a psychotic mess.
THC content of modern skunk or the hybrid South African sh*t is now about 15% higher (and increasing) than ten years ago and the effects are now hitting the stats. Alcohol consumption is coming down and the associated effects and illnesses will follow.
Nicotine is not as destructive as the other elements contained in tobacco, addictive yes.
Last edited by The Trooper 1815; 23 April 2015 at 10:25 PM.
#44
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Schizophrenia is often associated with Cannabis use, but the number of new cases in no way reflects the growth in Cannabis use. I think people susceptible to mental illness are more likely to use cannabis, I'm sure it doesn't help, but I do believe they have issues other than smoking weed.
#45
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
#48
Schizophrenia is often associated with Cannabis use, but the number of new cases in no way reflects the growth in Cannabis use. I think people susceptible to mental illness are more likely to use cannabis, I'm sure it doesn't help, but I do believe they have issues other than smoking weed.
Last edited by jonc; 24 April 2015 at 12:07 AM.
#49
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ask any psychiatric department how many of there current patient list are habitual cannabis or have been THC based drugs users and the figures are stark = most of them. If you know how THC works you will understand why so many "stoners" are in such a psychotic mess.
THC content of modern skunk or the hybrid South African sh*t is now about 15% higher (and increasing) than ten years ago and the effects are now hitting the stats. Alcohol consumption is coming down and the associated effects and illnesses will follow.
Nicotine is not as destructive as the other elements contained in tobacco, addictive yes.
THC content of modern skunk or the hybrid South African sh*t is now about 15% higher (and increasing) than ten years ago and the effects are now hitting the stats. Alcohol consumption is coming down and the associated effects and illnesses will follow.
Nicotine is not as destructive as the other elements contained in tobacco, addictive yes.
#50
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
I complete disagree (unless you are inferring that you'd have to be "mental" to use cannabis.) A family member was sectioned for his own safety after an extreme mental episode brought on by prolonged use of cannabis. He had no history of any mental illness prior to using cannabis and has had no further episodes since giving up this drug. He disappeared from his university campus and was off the radar for several days and was in a real bad state, mentally and physically, when I found him hundreds of miles away.
#51
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
#54
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
It's pretty obvious, some people flip out on Alcohol, that doesn't mean we should ban it, we should find out why they drank to excess which is obviously the case with Jon's mate. And fair play to you Jon for helping them out.
#56
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
#58
Jokes aside, he isn't just a mate, he's my brother and was very distressing to see him that state.
There may be an argument that some people are more susceptible to the psychological effects of cannabis, and there is no way knowing who those people are. But based on my experience, legalising cannabis and making it openly available would increase the likelihood of increasing mental disorders in our population adding additional strain to an already stretched NHS.
Last edited by jonc; 24 April 2015 at 09:54 AM.
#59
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Sorry to hear that Jon.
Please understand that we're not winning the war on drugs, not legalising it doesn't mean people won't use it, what it means is people will be using who knows what containing who knows what rather than a tested product. With legalisation we could invest in better education which may have discouraged your brother from smoking a lot of weed - yes that is a lot of weed - whilst under the added pressure of University.
Please understand that we're not winning the war on drugs, not legalising it doesn't mean people won't use it, what it means is people will be using who knows what containing who knows what rather than a tested product. With legalisation we could invest in better education which may have discouraged your brother from smoking a lot of weed - yes that is a lot of weed - whilst under the added pressure of University.
#60
Sorry to hear that Jon.
Please understand that we're not winning the war on drugs, not legalising it doesn't mean people won't use it, what it means is people will be using who knows what containing who knows what rather than a tested product. With legalisation we could invest in better education which may have discouraged your brother from smoking a lot of weed - yes that is a lot of weed - whilst under the added pressure of University.
Please understand that we're not winning the war on drugs, not legalising it doesn't mean people won't use it, what it means is people will be using who knows what containing who knows what rather than a tested product. With legalisation we could invest in better education which may have discouraged your brother from smoking a lot of weed - yes that is a lot of weed - whilst under the added pressure of University.
ps. Appreciated, but no need to applogise, it happened a long time ago.
Last edited by jonc; 24 April 2015 at 10:40 AM.