Clarkson has been sacked
At the end of the day people should be ashamed of themselves for making this story seem a lot more important than it is. A TV presenter has assaulted someone at work and unsurprisingly been removed form his position. That's it really and how anyone can defend what he has done is beyond me.
I detest the BBC as an organisation, but they are right on this occasion. End of!
Now let's all move on
I detest the BBC as an organisation, but they are right on this occasion. End of!
Now let's all move on
30 mins of verbal abuse is an awful long time to be standing there, why would anyone stand there to be abused,
Ok I know Clarkson was senior to him but most people would just walk off muttering **** head under their breath, it just doesn't add up.
Maybe he was a mole sent in by the BBC to create a situation or bribed by another channel.

Ok I know Clarkson was senior to him but most people would just walk off muttering **** head under their breath, it just doesn't add up.Maybe he was a mole sent in by the BBC to create a situation or bribed by another channel.


^^^ This
No one takes 30 minutes of verbal abuse and just sits there and takes it without either walking off or retaliating.
Its been a long day, you want food, its not there, alcohol is involved, tempers flare, an argument ensues and somone gets a cut lip. Its life, it happens.
What is being forgotten about in all the "acceptable conduct in the workplace chat" is that Clarkson is not an "employee" of the BBC. He's self employed and (was) operating under a contract. There's every possibility that the "producer" it is claimed he "hit" may also be self employed and working under a contract and not an employee either. Its common place in that industry.
As such the normal rules of what an employer (in this case the BBC) must do to ensure the safety of its employees under employment law, and the conduct that employees must adhere to, don't apply to Clarkson. That's why the BBC has simply not renewed his contract (or more correctly agreed a new one for next year). If the producer was an employee of the BBC, then of course the BBC have a legal obligation to protect its employees and probably had no option other than to do what they've done.
Last edited by Devildog; Mar 27, 2015 at 11:39 AM.
Originally Posted by BBC news
Speaking outside his home on Thursday, Clarkson asked fans to show restraint.
"I wish people would leave Ois alone because none of this was his fault," the presenter told reporters.
"I wish people would leave Ois alone because none of this was his fault," the presenter told reporters.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-32083181
Oh and from that HuffingtonPost link, is it just me or does Nigel Farage seem to fill the gap quite well?

Last edited by neil-h; Mar 27, 2015 at 12:50 PM.
I'm guessing star in a reasonably priced car will be out the window, the cool wall (seems to have died a death anyway) although I can foresee Clarkson pushing his luck with star in a reasonably shyte car and an untamed racing driver called the stag or some such, just to raise two fingers to the beeb. Top Gear will cease to exist or change dramatically anyway so may not be an issue.
Replace Clarkson? Have any of you seen what happened to Two and a Half Men when they 'tried' to replace Charlie Sheen?
Hopefully this will kick off, http://www.carsceneuk.com/?p=11553 the haters can watch the boring reviews of Ford Fiestas and Renault Clio's on the BBC while the rest of us can be entertained by Clarkson and Co on Sky..
Hopefully this will kick off, http://www.carsceneuk.com/?p=11553 the haters can watch the boring reviews of Ford Fiestas and Renault Clio's on the BBC while the rest of us can be entertained by Clarkson and Co on Sky..
Why's everyone so sure that Clarkson will continue? You've got to ask, what was his motivation for reporting himself to the powers that be? He's 55 this year and has more than enough money to retire on, I wouldn't be surprised if he calls it a day and enjoys an early retirement.
As for Top Gear, if the bbc have any sense they'll let it die. They won't be able to match the success they had in the Clarkson years just by replacing it and rehashing it as a 'proper car show' is a daft idea because no body watches 'proper car shoes' in the grand scheme of things (just look at 5th gear).
As for Top Gear, if the bbc have any sense they'll let it die. They won't be able to match the success they had in the Clarkson years just by replacing it and rehashing it as a 'proper car show' is a daft idea because no body watches 'proper car shoes' in the grand scheme of things (just look at 5th gear).










