Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Do you believe the official theory
Yes
66
52.80%
No
45
36.00%
Unsure
14
11.20%
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll

World Trade Centre poll

Old Jan 22, 2015 | 10:35 AM
  #241  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by bonesetter
There must be cameras pointing all over the place

Thing is, and not wanting to make this personal, you are completely closed to the possibility of something being not quite as the official story goes.

Don't you think governments have propaganda to think about to control their people?

Every g'ment has a Ministry of Propaganda - haven't you read 1984 or Brave New World?

You only have to look at who benefits, and look what has happened 'terror wise' since 9/11. There are literally hundreds of terror groups now springing up all over the place.

And then are there are all the 'anti-terror laws' (yours and mine persoanl freedoms) coming in...

Arguing small details of 'conspiracy theories' here could go on forever, but look at the bigger picture - it's right there in front of your eyes
we know the bigger picture - 1% own more wealth than the bottom 99%

there has been a revolving door between the heads of the US Federal Reserve and the leading US Banks,

The Secret Services will ALWAYS lobby for more power and control - that's what they do

the rich and powerful will always bend events to their advantage, getting richer and more powerful - that's what they do, that's the advantage of being rich and powerful

power and wealth tends to converge and consolidate - we know this - see my first point above

your not really telling me anything new

Last edited by hodgy0_2; Jan 22, 2015 at 10:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 12:59 PM
  #242  
bonesetter's Avatar
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 6
From: Midlands
Default

How about this then?

5 Huge Government Conspiracies Theories That Actually Happened

Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 01:11 PM
  #243  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Cool

Originally Posted by bonesetter


Explosions were heard and seen and recorded on film coming from the base levels, not on the 80 whatever floors where some smallish fires were - and black smoke only remember so no-where near girder bending temps

At a few levels down the lights, air con, lifts etc were working fine

neither tower fell on top WTC7. Both free-fell on their own footprint

rocket science it is?
WTC7 was hit by the south tower as it fell. Where on earth do you get this rubbish about falling in their own footprint. I watched it live on the day, it was clear that it did not.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:03 PM
  #244  
bonesetter's Avatar
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 6
From: Midlands
Default

falling on their own footprints is something I made up

To describe them pretty much collapsing on top of themselves, rather than falling sideways
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:11 PM
  #245  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Cool

Originally Posted by bonesetter
falling on their own footprints is something I made up

To describe them pretty much collapsing on top of themselves, rather than falling sideways
Both towers collapsed in consistent with how events actually unfolded. The pancaking of the floors (brought about by collapse from the top, not bottom) allowed them to fall 'relatively' striaght down, but the outer columns were free to peel away, hitting all the buildings (and not just WTC7) around the north and south towers.

If they had been brought down by explosives, the pancaking would not have occurred and we would have seen a totally different result (well, apart from them being very short )
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:40 PM
  #246  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by gary77
i get what your saying , but it is strange that the fbi took all videos of the plane from local businesses and the only footage they have to show us is 5 frames
The plane flew over a major highway just before hitting, you would of thought there would be dozens off clips for this low flying bird from people's mobile phones all over the internet,............there is not one! Just witness reports only.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:45 PM
  #247  
bonesetter's Avatar
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 6
From: Midlands
Default

^ zero footage whatsoever

Oh, sorry the FBI has loads from all the cameras. That's alright then
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:49 PM
  #248  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Exactly the same as 7/7, London being the most CCTV captured capital on earth, they have one or two grainy images only. Stinks of poo poo
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:53 PM
  #249  
bonesetter's Avatar
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 6
From: Midlands
Default

And Di's murder - oops, accident

All 73 cameras en route switched off

No conspiracy there either, move along now
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 02:54 PM
  #250  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Yup more important things to worry about, like who's next to get evicted in big bro lol
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 03:49 PM
  #251  
jonc's Avatar
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by stipete75
Exactly the same as 7/7, London being the most CCTV captured capital on earth, they have one or two grainy images only. Stinks of poo poo
What also stinks of poo poo is if you know so much about the truth of all these atrocities, and considering that a few shadey groups of omnipotent people are able to pull off one of THE most complex and elaborate operation without leaving a trace of themselves and bumping off people in the know, why or how are you able to evade these very same people? Or is it simply because they haven't come across SN yet?

Last edited by jonc; Jan 22, 2015 at 03:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 03:51 PM
  #252  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by stipete75
Exactly the same as 7/7, London being the most CCTV captured capital on earth, they have one or two grainy images only. Stinks of poo poo
The CCTV is looking for pickpockets, not many of them at cruising altitude..
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:00 PM
  #253  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

also without having to state the obvious (but you sometimes have to)

this is 2001 - before the smartphone
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:37 PM
  #254  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
also without having to state the obvious (but you sometimes have to)

this is 2001 - before the smartphone
I know that and you know that, but these nutters manage to ignore these blatantly obvious holes in their arguments.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:40 PM
  #255  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
also without having to state the obvious (but you sometimes have to)

this is 2001 - before the smartphone
I stand corrected, Iv just googled it, camera phones were introduced to the public in early 2001 in japan first, then rolled out to the states in early 2002.
I must be getting old lol
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:41 PM
  #256  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I know that and you know that, but these nutters manage to ignore these blatantly obvious holes in their arguments.
Who asked you to join our convo, speak only when spoken too.............tard.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:42 PM
  #257  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
The CCTV is looking for pickpockets, not many of them at cruising altitude..
7/7 not 9/11
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:53 PM
  #258  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
What also stinks of poo poo is if you know so much about the truth of all these atrocities, and considering that a few shadey groups of omnipotent people are able to pull off one of THE most complex and elaborate operation without leaving a trace of themselves and bumping off people in the know, why or how are you able to evade these very same people? Or is it simply because they haven't come across SN yet?
Wake up, the CIA invented the word conspiracy theorists.
Those who believe mainstream stories(lies, not all are lies)are the ‘crazies’,conspiracy theorists are saner and reflect conventional wisdom.

The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination!

Although the CIA designed propaganda seems to be wearing off,as those who do not believe government accounts of such events as 9/11 7/7 JFK outnumber believers by more than two to one.

I am one of many millions all around the globe who doubt "some" official msm stories, and as you are probarly aware snet is hardly the holy grail of the internet.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 04:55 PM
  #259  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by stipete75
Who asked you to join our convo, speak only when spoken too.............tard.
You very quickly turn nasty when your alternative reality is questioned don't you?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #260  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
You very quickly turn nasty when your alternative reality is questioned don't you?
More to the point than nasty Martin,,,,this is hardly the matrix!
Now do us all a favour and foooooook off









































Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 05:17 PM
  #261  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by stipete75
More to the point than nasty Martin,,,,this is hardly the matrix!
Now do us all a favour and foooooook off


No
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 05:21 PM
  #262  
stipete75's Avatar
stipete75
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: weymouth
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
No
Well said that man, stand your ground, this isn't primary school now.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 05:36 PM
  #263  
jonc's Avatar
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by stipete75
Wake up, the CIA invented the word conspiracy theorists.
Those who believe mainstream stories(lies, not all are lies)are the ‘crazies’,conspiracy theorists are saner and reflect conventional wisdom.

The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination!

Although the CIA designed propaganda seems to be wearing off,as those who do not believe government accounts of such events as 9/11 7/7 JFK outnumber believers by more than two to one.

I am one of many millions all around the globe who doubt "some" official msm stories, and as you are probarly aware snet is hardly the holy grail of the internet.
It was a tongue in cheek post! I am awake, like you I like to ask questions that remain unanswered and accounts of events that just don't add up, except their directed at conspiracy theorist. I don't see why they should escape inquisition either!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 06:02 PM
  #264  
gary77's Avatar
gary77
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 1
From: fife
Default

Originally Posted by Carnut
I've said this before but it's called gathering evidence/information for a investigation, would you rather they just guessed at what happened and maybe asked a few people on Facebook.
That doesn't change the fact or the point I made. Which was that the only footage they can show us is 5 frames.

Understandy
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 06:12 PM
  #265  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
You very quickly turn nasty when your alternative reality is questioned don't you?
Hardly unique in that respect. If you hadn't quoted him I might have thought you were responding to someone else.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 06:27 PM
  #266  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by gary77
That doesn't change the fact or the point I made. Which was that the only footage they can show us is 5 frames.

Understandy
do you know what the average frame rate and viewable range for, circa 1990's, CCTV technology

do you also know what the proximity or speed of the aircraft was when it did or didn't pass CCTV cameras
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 06:58 PM
  #267  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
What also stinks of poo poo is if you know so much about the truth of all these atrocities, and considering that a few shadey groups of omnipotent people are able to pull off one of THE most complex and elaborate operation without leaving a trace of themselves and bumping off people in the know, why or how are you able to evade these very same people? Or is it simply because they haven't come across SN yet?
Or maybe it's because 'they' think no one would be mad enough to believe these conspiracies are real.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 07:12 PM
  #268  
daveyj's Avatar
daveyj
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Cotswolds
Default

Or simply Guns versus Fists/Sauce pans.......

Even if it did come to light that it was an inside job......would you want to have a go? I wouldn't. Just saying.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 07:22 PM
  #269  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

I've just seen this else where and had to punt it out on here.


Last edited by neil-h; Jan 22, 2015 at 07:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2015 | 07:36 PM
  #270  
gary77's Avatar
gary77
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 1
From: fife
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
do you know what the average frame rate and viewable range for, circa 1990's, CCTV technology
no but one camera managed to catch it . was it imposable for most cctv to film a plane in that year ?

do you also know what the proximity or speed of the aircraft was when it did or didn't pass CCTV cameras

if it did cross the viewing path of any cctv it would have been doing around 500mph i think and could of been any distance from it within reason and if it didnt pass cctv then well it doesnt matter how far away it was from the cctv it didnt pass or the speed it was doing while not passing cctv

HTH

Last edited by gary77; Jan 22, 2015 at 07:43 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 PM.