Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

TESCO - Basic question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 September 2014, 09:07 PM
  #31  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Sure, but are you saying that the directors remuneration has no link to the share price

That seems odd

Do you mean "staff" bonuses
Old 24 September 2014, 09:27 PM
  #32  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xline
Not wanting to digress too far ... but what do Tesco care about the share price? This is a genuine question! I get it that at IPO they get the money from the initial purchasers, and are of course obliged to payout the dividends to the holders at the appropriate times, but what difference does it make to Tesco the value that the share is subsequently exchanged at between investors, fund managers, day traders etc? This is something that I am fundamentally missing in my understanding.
Well for a start it defines the value and capitalisation of the company

So if it has taken out loans based on a valuation and certain level of capitalisation etc then it may have to repay them it that falls

It can borrow at better rates etc

And that's just for starters

I don't think any PLC is obliged to pay out any dividends btw

But I freely admit I am not an expert
Old 24 September 2014, 09:54 PM
  #33  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Tesco is losing the war between the 4 big main rivals and its share price has been in a steady decline along with its market share for the past year. It's all about perception and maintaining the perception of success and managing market expectation to keep/attract investors and maintain market capital and ratings. Tesco aren't about to go down the pan, remember the Group still posted an annual pre-tax profit of £3.3bn for 2013.
Old 24 September 2014, 09:56 PM
  #34  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Was has that link got to do with anything

And yes I would imagine Tesco do have loans, - does tesco have a credit rating, I would imagine it does

And lastly, if a company does not pay a dividend, then your only hope is capital growth
Old 24 September 2014, 10:02 PM
  #35  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

But tesco as an entity is a public company

By buying shares, you own part of Tesco's

So the value it has to Tesco's - is the value it has to you

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 24 September 2014 at 10:05 PM.
Old 24 September 2014, 10:04 PM
  #36  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xline
The fact that they're a bank and by being so they have had to prove that they have a significant amount of assets. I watched BankOfDave
And banks borrow money, and their market capitalisation will have an effect on that
Old 24 September 2014, 10:14 PM
  #37  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xline
This is exactly what I am asking though. If You bought Tesco shares tomorrow, Tesco wouldn't see any of your money, you'd only be buying the shares from someone else via a broker. So what's the significance of the value to Tesco themselves?
From Tesco's point of view it's about market capitalisation, the measure of value of the company. Investors use this figure to determine the company's worth. Capitalisation through shares provides liquidity for the company, for it to invest in itself, to fund expansion etc. The unintended drop in share price has reduced its capital and thus its ability to invest, but I'm guessing they have enough cash in its bank account to carry on trading and to see through this dip in capital.

Last edited by jonc; 24 September 2014 at 10:20 PM.
Old 24 September 2014, 10:58 PM
  #38  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xline
So what do they care?



I suppose that answers my question then. Ta
When you say "they", who do you mean the executives the run Tesco's

Yes maybe they don't care, after all they only run Tesco's on behalf of the shareholders

As I said the the Labour Party post - it's not their money
Old 25 September 2014, 01:11 AM
  #39  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I'll ask the question again. If it's only a profit forecast that was misreported, whether by Tesco staff or by their auditors, and there's no proof that whoever did so stood to or has actually made any financial gain from that misreporting, has any law been broken here? Or is the whole fuss just about the perception of impropriety?
Old 25 September 2014, 07:16 AM
  #40  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Yes, maybe simply an example of poor governance, lack of financial controls and a general lack of focus on the core business

And might explain why Tesco has been steadily loosing market share and the share price losing value

Being "a bit ****" is not a crime after all


(My wife uses Tesco home delivery all the time)
Old 25 September 2014, 02:38 PM
  #41  
daveyj
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
daveyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt Jack Sparrow
Price Waterhouse Cooper are the company that do this for Tesco
Price Waterhouse Crooks.

I remember an article about two of their accountants, on secondment to HMRC, sanctioning payments for these super hospitals before going back to normal jobs. The then Secretary of Health came under huge scrutiny for it and the story went dead! Was in The Telegraph I think. Good two plus years ago.
Old 25 September 2014, 03:27 PM
  #42  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

lol it is much worse than that

The "Big four" second Accountants to help the HMRC write the Tax Law

these same Accounting firms then, with inside knowledge, devise and sell the loopholes to anyone who can afford it to avoid billons in Tax

you really could not make it up
Old 25 September 2014, 07:18 PM
  #43  
daveyj
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
daveyj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
lol it is much worse than that

The "Big four" second Accountants to help the HMRC write the Tax Law

these same Accounting firms then, with inside knowledge, devise and sell the loopholes to anyone who can afford it to avoid billons in Tax

you really could not make it up
That's terrible. Still, if I was wealthy enough to worry, I think I'd like some of that knowledge......truth be known. But I'm not, so it's terrible. At least I'm not sitting on splinters on this one.
Old 25 September 2014, 07:48 PM
  #44  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveyj
Th if I was wealthy enough to worry, I think I'd like some of that knowledge......truth be known
yes, and totally understandable, truth be told most people would do the same


i suppose that's how they get away with it!!!
Old 25 September 2014, 09:41 PM
  #45  
EOEUMC
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
EOEUMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rolling in my limo
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And it seems that because of the ***** up on the profit thingy that a new superstore there building in Chatteris, Cambridgeshire has been put on hold after spending £22 million on it lol
Old 26 September 2014, 07:31 AM
  #46  
Cpt Jack Sparrow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Cpt Jack Sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EOEUMC
And it seems that because of the ***** up on the profit thingy that a new superstore there building in Chatteris, Cambridgeshire has been put on hold after spending £22 million on it lol
Actually that not the reason, I have been working close to that project.

And £22 million has not been spent, that would be totals cost at completion, there's just a bit of landscaping been done so far

Last edited by Cpt Jack Sparrow; 26 September 2014 at 07:50 AM.
Old 26 September 2014, 09:29 PM
  #47  
EOEUMC
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
EOEUMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rolling in my limo
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt Jack Sparrow
Actually that not the reason, I have been working close to that project.

And £22 million has not been spent, that would be totals cost at completion, there's just a bit of landscaping been done so far
A bit of landscaping! Your having a laugh pmsl

http://www.cambstimes.co.uk/news/exc...jobs_1_3778121
Old 27 September 2014, 01:28 PM
  #48  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xline
The cynic in me wonders if the adjustment of the profit forecast has had a significant enough impact on the potential dividend payout to knock down the share price value.
With regard to who f*cked up and why/how etc ... who really cares?
If, however, it doesn't actually affect the dividend payout, then a small number of people can take a fall from grace so that some can profit massively from the stock market manipulation by buying in now when the price has dropped like a stone and selling when the fuss has all blown over and it has recovered back to where it was.
I wish I'd dropped a couple of £K on this. Oh ... maybe I did.
It's about more than Shareholder being 250 million less rich then they thought they would be, but about the reputational damage of being caught 'cooking the books'.
Old 27 September 2014, 01:31 PM
  #49  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
I suppose it would be more serious if there were irregular share purchases by the directors

but I suspect it was not done for immediate personal gain by the directors i.e. a short term manipulation the share price - they would not be that stupid

more of a cultural thing
Massive pressure at all levels on price and profit is my guess. Staff in fear of not delivering.
Old 23 October 2014, 03:50 PM
  #50  
Cpt Jack Sparrow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Cpt Jack Sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Xline

As it's hit the news, is this what your comment was about?
No, not really.

I have worked for the company for 25 years, since leaving the Forces.

So I get really frustrated with the slagging off and the hatred for the company, when I work bloody hard for my wages.

I find it amazing people genuinely want the company to colapse with the loss of 500,000 jobs globally and 320,000 in the UK.

Seems alot of people want to tar everyone with the same brush, when its just a few that cause the problem.

Its very embarrasing telling people who you work for at the moment when I should really be proud of it.

Tha last person told responded with " so you are a fraudster and a crook".... nice!!

That is why I dont like to comment!

however seems ike I just have
Old 23 October 2014, 04:15 PM
  #51  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt Jack Sparrow
No, not really.

I have worked for the company for 25 years, since leaving the Forces.

So I get really frustrated with the slagging off and the hatred for the company, when I work bloody hard for my wages.

I find it amazing people genuinely want the company to colapse with the loss of 500,000 jobs globally and 320,000 in the UK.

Seems alot of people want to tar everyone with the same brush, when its just a few that cause the problem.

Its very embarrasing telling people who you work for at the moment when I should really be proud of it.

Tha last person told responded with " so you are a fraudster and a crook".... nice!!

That is why I dont like to comment!

however seems ike I just have
yes I see, all the downside of saying your a banker without the wage packet

ps - I think Tesco's is no better or worse than its competition (and better than Morrison's - it may be cheap but have you seen the pond life shuffling around the isles)
Old 23 October 2014, 05:38 PM
  #52  
legb4rsk
Scooby Regular
 
legb4rsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PaulC72
People are very stupid thats the problem.

I have seen it in the supermarkets people grab and don't look at anything else around the item they are grabbing.

You cannot blame the supermarkets for pricing items this way if people are going to buy them.
I quite like it!!!
I treat shopping in supermarkets like a game or battle of wits if you will.
Just like to see how much I have saved at the end of a shop.

Too be fair it is wrong what they do with their pricing structure.
Some of them are just laughable.They currently have a large display of Lindt chocolates by the ciggie counter with a sign saying :

'NOW ONLY £6'

No reference to what the original price was or what the saving is.

Ref Tescos.My sister deals with hundreds of different companies for her job & consistantly states that Tesco sre the most difficult & unpleasant to deal with.

Last edited by legb4rsk; 23 October 2014 at 05:40 PM.
Old 23 October 2014, 07:50 PM
  #53  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
When you say "they", who do you mean the executives the run Tesco's

Yes maybe they don't care, after all they only run Tesco's on behalf of the shareholders

As I said the the Labour Party post - it's not their money
Interesting question which comes down to a theory of the firm I think?

What is a company, who does it belong to, who runs it, etc.
Old 23 October 2014, 08:19 PM
  #54  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Of the four large supermarkets I have had to deal with, Tesco's customer care is second to all of them.
Old 23 October 2014, 08:34 PM
  #55  
hux309
Also known as daz
 
hux309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 3,093
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

After seeing the bullish tactics they use to threaten suppliers who won't tow the line, i for one won't miss them when they're gone.

People tend to remember things like that.
Old 23 October 2014, 08:38 PM
  #56  
Cpt Jack Sparrow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Cpt Jack Sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hux309
After seeing the bullish tactics they use to threaten suppliers who won't tow the line, i for one won't miss them when they're gone.

People tend to remember things like that.
Do you really think they will go....... Seriously??
Old 23 October 2014, 08:42 PM
  #57  
hux309
Also known as daz
 
hux309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 3,093
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt Jack Sparrow
Do you really think they will go....... Seriously??

Truthfully no, but downsize they will if things continue.
Old 23 October 2014, 08:54 PM
  #58  
Cpt Jack Sparrow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Cpt Jack Sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hux309
Truthfully no, but downsize they will if things continue.
That's already happening
Old 23 October 2014, 09:30 PM
  #59  
stedee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
stedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: nr leeds
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tbh I think ppl jump on the bandwagon because its the largest supermarket like the banks etc slagging them off but they have a 30% share so someone must like them.
I use them, nearest to me, always found the staff helpful and polite, some of the deals are dodgy I have to admit so you have to be on your guard.
Old 23 October 2014, 11:11 PM
  #60  
jods
Scooby Senior
 
jods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 6,645
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The word around here is that the situation at Tescos is so deficient that it would actually be generous to call it fraudulent as that would imply some level of street smarts. Arrogant / aggressive. Who knows, but there are a LOT of people watching with interest.


Quick Reply: TESCO - Basic question



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 PM.