Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Newage to Classic - Am I mad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2014 | 07:26 AM
  #61  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Oi, Hands off she's mine.

I thought you said earlier that every time you washed it you'd be thinking where's the boot.

It's a lovely car and you can't beat a wagon, I should have bought one years ago, they have the best of both worlds. Fresh tyres and a recent cambelt means it's good to go and you'll get a bit of warranty too. I'm sure Max will do you a good deal on your Blob.

If I had the spare cash I'd be very sorely tempted.
As much as really want a saloon, like you say, everything on the wagon is done. And it does look mint. Has anyone on here actually viewed it?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2014 | 10:20 AM
  #62  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Have to say Chris that wagon looks very very nice indeed and with a little 'un in your life the extra space may well become useful.

On another note... you b**tard, now I want a classic again
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2014 | 12:14 PM
  #63  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Have to say Chris that wagon looks very very nice indeed and with a little 'un in your life the extra space may well become useful.

On another note... you b**tard, now I want a classic again


Agreed, a wagon would be handy. Just have to get head around looks. Going to have a think over it this week.

I took the wrx out this morning to pop to the shops and it drives spot on. So it is going a tough decision.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2014 | 08:46 PM
  #64  
jameswrx's Avatar
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 42
From: Kent
Default

There's a classic Sti wagon on eBay at the moment, late one in sonic. Don't really like the advert much and pics are rubbish but if anyone's close..

Last edited by jameswrx; Sep 21, 2014 at 08:49 PM. Reason: Iphone auto spell
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 12:53 AM
  #65  
tractiont's Avatar
tractiont
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Ashford,Middlesex
Default

I've just changed from a Hawkeye back to a classic sti tonight.
Loved the drive home it's all about power to weight ratio
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 07:13 AM
  #66  
fawor's Avatar
fawor
BANNED
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 1
From: crushing fat-thomass
Default

Classic looks crap, I never seen pedestrian who look at it.
Its looking good on tow car heading to scrap yard
For what You need more than 300hp is beyond me as even some rally drivers have no ***** to push it to the limit.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 08:55 AM
  #67  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by fawor
Classic looks crap, I never seen pedestrian who look at it.
I suggest you surrender your driving licence then as clearly your eyesight has failed. Classics get far more looks than any other Scoob. I have had some nice cars in my life, but the only car that comes close to the attention and compliments my mica red classic used to get is the AMG.

The classic IS THE iconic Impreza, everything else is just AN Impreza!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 09:24 AM
  #68  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

Originally Posted by fawor
Classic looks crap, I never seen pedestrian who look at it.
Its looking good on tow car heading to scrap yard
For what You need more than 300hp is beyond me as even some rally drivers have no ***** to push it to the limit.
How old are you?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #69  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Gear Head
How old are you?
He's the same on every thread Chris, ignore him
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 10:37 AM
  #70  
lordharding's Avatar
lordharding
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,802
Likes: 2
From: cumbria
Default

Originally Posted by fawor
Classic looks crap, I never seen pedestrian who look at it.
Its looking good on tow car heading to scrap yard
For what You need more than 300hp is beyond me as even some rally drivers have no ***** to push it to the limit.
Don't think your going to fit well on here
Haven't you got homework to do ?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 10:58 AM
  #71  
LSherratt's Avatar
LSherratt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,380
Likes: 2
From: On a farm
Default

I've never driven a newage but I'm smitten with my classic. For a 15 year old car she's brilliant to drive and it's only a standard turbo 2000. I'd really like to try an STI which is why once I'm more settled I'd like a V6 STI Type R .
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2014 | 06:45 PM
  #72  
Flat4x4-again's Avatar
Flat4x4-again
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 585
Likes: 40
From: Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by LSherratt
I've never driven a newage but I'm smitten with my classic. For a 15 year old car she's brilliant to drive and it's only a standard turbo 2000. I'd really like to try an STI which is why once I'm more settled I'd like a V6 STI Type R .
Same here apart from the last sentence apart from I've got a V6... reg rather than a V6 STi !

Feels much more 'mechanical' (in a good way) than most modern cars
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 10:17 AM
  #73  
IveGotTheBug's Avatar
IveGotTheBug
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: A house
Default

Have owned newage and classic,prefer the bugs over the blob + you dont see many bugs but at the mo im running a white classic wagon on a v plate,looks well and drives better than the new ages ive owned tbh
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #74  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

I've done the whole power thing in a classic by god its scary fun but this time I have started with the handling and working backwards as I enjoy short blasts much more than motorway drags now.

The car is now with Chevron for final tweaks and geo setup, it is only running around 330bhp but it is so much fun as you can use all the power more of the time, than I ever could with my previous car.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 12:56 PM
  #75  
thenewgalaxy's Avatar
thenewgalaxy
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,302
Likes: 13
From: Lancuntshire
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
I've done the whole power thing in a classic by god its scary fun but this time I have started with the handling and working backwards as I enjoy short blasts much more than motorway drags now.

The car is now with Chevron for final tweaks and geo setup, it is only running around 330bhp but it is so much fun as you can use all the power more of the time, than I ever could with my previous car.
Exactly the same could be said about my pair as they're currently setup.

One (the Cosworth) is more capable than the other in most circumstances but the other (S202) is more fun to drive as you can push it harder without fear of ending up in a warp speed fireball if you get it wrong (or blink at the wrong moment).

As I said earlier in the thread I would recommend the OP looks at an early newage RA though I would not fancy my chances crashing a classic.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 02:04 PM
  #76  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by thenewgalaxy
though I would not fancy my chances crashing a classic.
Back in the old days of SN when the classic was the only Scoob made (yes that long ago) there were some threads posted of people who had had major impacts and rolls in classics and despite not being as good as today's cars they stood up surprisingly well. I especially remember a green one that had rolled three times and both occupants walked away with minor cuts and bruises.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2014 | 06:50 PM
  #77  
Flat4x4-again's Avatar
Flat4x4-again
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 585
Likes: 40
From: Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Back in the old days of SN when the classic was the only Scoob made (yes that long ago) there were some threads posted of people who had had major impacts and rolls in classics and despite not being as good as today's cars they stood up surprisingly well. I especially remember a green one that had rolled three times and both occupants walked away with minor cuts and bruises.
I remember that one as well when I had my previous one in 2002 - I think it was in Scotland somewhere. Saw a similar one on 'SCU serious crash unit' the other week where a classic WRX had left the road at high speed and somersaulted over a 6ft high fence. Driver fine but passenger (no belt?) wasn't. The basic structure of the car itself was 'fine'.

Maybe they fly well...
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2014 | 07:19 AM
  #78  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
I've done the whole power thing in a classic by god its scary fun but this time I have started with the handling and working backwards as I enjoy short blasts much more than motorway drags now.

The car is now with Chevron for final tweaks and geo setup, it is only running around 330bhp but it is so much fun as you can use all the power more of the time, than I ever could with my previous car.
Just goes to show that sometimes less is more, I have always been able to have more fun in a less powerful car especially when they handle really well, Mazda MX5 is the perfect example, they go around corners with the **** hanging out and straighten back up without any drama. You should try your Type R with some slightly less sticky rubber and 16's at that power level makes for a really fun drive and quite predictable too.

Last edited by ditchmyster; Oct 2, 2014 at 07:22 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2014 | 09:45 AM
  #79  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Flat4x4-again
I remember that one as well when I had my previous one in 2002 - I think it was in Scotland somewhere. Saw a similar one on 'SCU serious crash unit' the other week where a classic WRX had left the road at high speed and somersaulted over a 6ft high fence. Driver fine but passenger (no belt?) wasn't. The basic structure of the car itself was 'fine'.

Maybe they fly well...
Well they're quite light

Seriously though I wouldn't worry about driving one as a daily from a safety point of view, most of the recent advances made in the safety ratings are to do with pedestrian impact safety rather than occupant safety anyway.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2014 | 05:49 PM
  #80  
bigmac's Avatar
bigmac
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Cool

Sold my classic a few years back - loved it when I had it. Miss it now - but my lad needed something he could drive and get insurance on (STi import didn't really fit the requirements ).

Just to get the juices going Gear Head, here's the web page I created when I sold her...

http://www.diggler.co.uk/subaru/

I think you can tell which side of the fence I am, when it comes to the Classic shape!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2014 | 06:46 PM
  #81  
thenewgalaxy's Avatar
thenewgalaxy
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,302
Likes: 13
From: Lancuntshire
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Back in the old days of SN when the classic was the only Scoob made (yes that long ago) there were some threads posted of people who had had major impacts and rolls in classics and despite not being as good as today's cars they stood up surprisingly well. I especially remember a green one that had rolled three times and both occupants walked away with minor cuts and bruises.
Originally Posted by f1_fan
Well they're quite light

Seriously though I wouldn't worry about driving one as a daily from a safety point of view, most of the recent advances made in the safety ratings are to do with pedestrian impact safety rather than occupant safety anyway.
I'm not bashing classics - I think they're great cars and understand entirely why some people don't hold the newage and hatch cars in the same regard (or any at all) - but we all have a different (and biased!) viewpoint usually shaped by experience.

I know someone that's still with us because of the good design of the classic, but what was good 15 years ago is quite crude by the very latest standards. It's fair to say that pedestrian safety has seen the largest improvements in the last few years but there was a massive drive across the industry to improve standards and of course we're left now with overweight and lardy boxes. Look how the VW Golf has changed, for example.

The major weight gain between the classic and newage chassis was due to the rigidity of the body being improved. In fact I remember a thread on a forum back in 2004-odd about the side pillars and bodywork being so strongly reinforced that rescue equipment struggled to cut through it.

I'm not saying the newage is the safest car you can buy but in my opinion it's a massive improvement over a classic. I've recently seen a car accident involving a newage and a side collision with a van at motorway speeds, where the Impreza took a very high speed side impact. One of the occupants of the car was hospitalised but the driver whose door took the main impact walked away. I don't think a classic driver would have been so lucky.

Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 08:51 AM
  #82  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Actually the classic has the same side bars in the doors as the newage so will probably be about the same with regards side impact, modern car design is more about crumple zones which is why they look so bad after a crash, they also have big *** A-pillars which I believe transmits the forces into the roof which is why you often see a warped roof on modern cars after an impact, older cars with thin A-pillars just kink the pillar.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 10:22 AM
  #83  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Actually the classic has the same side bars in the doors as the newage so will probably be about the same with regards side impact, modern car design is more about crumple zones which is why they look so bad after a crash, they also have big *** A-pillars which I believe transmits the forces into the roof which is why you often see a warped roof on modern cars after an impact, older cars with thin A-pillars just kink the pillar.
Agreed, the body improvements to the newage was more to do with torsional stiffness for handling and to allow better front/rear crumple zones to be deployed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StefanW
Wanted
7
Sep 28, 2015 09:42 PM
alcazar
Non Scooby Related
37
Sep 27, 2015 10:35 PM
narelle
Wanted
2
Sep 26, 2015 12:41 PM
M4RKG
Wanted
4
Sep 25, 2015 09:54 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 PM.