Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Why don't Citroen do road-going versions of its WRC car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #1  
brickboy's Avatar
brickboy
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Question

Citroen can't give its cars away 'cos they've got the looks of a bulldog licking p1ss off a nettle, and they're slow.

Surely a good way to boost the image would be to launch a road version of the WRC car?

Don't forget, Subaru made cars for farmers and district nurses before the Impreza turbo (yes, I know the Lego turbo was available before but who'd ever heard of Subaru?).

I just think it's bizarre that the company goes to the massive expense of running a very successful WRC campaign, then doesn't go the extra mile and make a version punters can buy.

Is it 'cos they is French?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 09:59 AM
  #2  
Bumpster's Avatar
Bumpster
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Post

Same with the Pug though!

Imagine a 220bhp awd Pug on the road!
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #3  
OllyK's Avatar
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Post

You can by a WRC Pug. 300 Bhp and for a mere £1000 per bhp as well. Look on the Pug web site and they are for sale. I do agree they ought to do a realistically priced AWD version though. Had a GTi 140 and the wheels would spin in 3rd. Tried a 180, no wheel spin but the TC was working its nuts off most of the time, felt slower than the 140.

[Edited by OllyK - 12/24/2003 11:29:03 AM]
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
AllanB's Avatar
AllanB
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
From: Potters Bar
Post

I always thought that and thiought a WRC Accent from Hyundai would be a good image booster for them too.

206 WRC looks great and I'm sure the and the Xsara would sell pretty well.



AllanB
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #5  
class_A's Avatar
class_A
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: elsewhere
Post

All the platforms the cars are based on are FWD, hence why there is no Focus 4x4 either until they move to the new platform next year.

Manufacturers don't want the added expense of designing a 4wd system if they only want to make "shopping cars". Ford have gone AWD as they want to produce a Focus C-Max "soft roader" and other cars based on the platform will use AWD (eg. Volvo)

From AutoExpress: The C1 floorpan will also underpin the Mazda 3, forthcoming Volvo V50 and even the next Land Rover Freelander. The platform's versatility means cars can also be front, rear or even four-wheel drive.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #6  
clarence's Avatar
clarence
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Post

The reason why Subaru (& Mitsubishi) offers performance versions of Impreza & Legacy is cos of the Group A rules. They must make at least 5000 units of roadgoing turbocharged 4x4 cars in order to be able to compete in WRC then.
There's no need for Citroen or Peugeot to make roadgoing versions of their WR cars, as it's not a requirement now.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 04:53 PM
  #7  
16vmarc's Avatar
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage, York
Post

My mates got a Xsara VTS Coupe and its 2.0 16v engine produces 167bhp as standard. Thats a good power output, 0-60 is about 7-8sec and it will do 140mph. Hardly crap is it!!!! Hardly a contender for the Civic Type-R but theres not much else to rival it is there!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 08:27 PM
  #8  
scoobynutta555's Avatar
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
From: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Post

0-60 is about 7-8sec and it will do 140mph

Pretty much any performance 2 litre will give figures like that, off the top of my head an astra gsi old shape does 0-60 in 7.5 and top end just shy 140 mph. These can be bought for around 2k.

I would say theres plenty of rivals out there for the power and performance you are stating.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 08:32 PM
  #9  
16vmarc's Avatar
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage, York
Post

0-60 7.7sec.

Yeah i know what your saying, but the latest SRi only has 144bhp and does 0-60 in 8sec, 133mph top end.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 08:57 PM
  #10  
scoobynutta555's Avatar
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
From: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Post

the gsi 0-60 differs from low sevens to high 7s depending on where you look.

Isnt the sri range 1.8i 16v or 2.2i 16v twin-cam engines - or the turbocharged and intercooled 2.0DTi 16v diesel unit. And i think there was a limited run of 500 2.2 sri turbos.

Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #11  
16vmarc's Avatar
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage, York
Post

I was referring to the 2.0 16v but yeah what youve said is correct!!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 09:03 PM
  #12  
16vmarc's Avatar
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage, York
Post

Ah! the 500 Turbos were 2.0!!!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 09:08 PM
  #13  
scoobynutta555's Avatar
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
From: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Post

yer the 500 were 2 litre not 2.2 and were a stop gap til the gsi turbo.
0-60 7.5 and 152 mph
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Iqy7861
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
22
Oct 12, 2015 09:21 AM
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
Sep 23, 2015 09:11 AM
ossett2k2
General Technical
9
Sep 13, 2015 09:35 AM
scottydouk
General Technical
2
Sep 10, 2015 11:10 PM
alcazar
Other Marques
9
Sep 9, 2015 05:42 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 PM.