Thread: Question Time
View Single Post
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 09:40 AM
  #13  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Fewer would of been 'kiiled', but far more would of died.

Infant mortality rate was just awful in Iraq under Sadam, it's now much much lower, on that score alone we have saved 100's thousands of lives over the past 8 years.

Of course sanctions had much to do with the high mortality rate, but those would never of been lifted whilst Sadam was in power, for me it just adds power to the argument that we did the right thing in getting rid of him.
beautifully constructed circular argument btw

high mortality rate

caused by our sanctions

which would remain – causing more and more deaths

so we had to get rid of Saddam

back to top
Reply