wahabbism, islamism, two terms which you need to define.

I assume by isalmism you are referring to the Omar Bakri and his cult & those with similar goals & ideas (Hizb ut-Tahrir and al-Muhajirun etc)

Their ways and means of attaining there goals are:
1) Nurturing individuals in private upon the ideology of the cult (the underground stage),
2) then with sufficient followers, bring it out in the open (the open calling stage),
3) and then hope to initiate a general revolution (the inevitable confrontation) through which the khilaafah can be established.

But, as using communist revolutionary doctrines is not from the Shar'iyy asbaab (ways & means) in rectifying the people or the land, and where these methods have been implemented (1960s Egypt, 1980s Syria, 1990s Algeria), there was no khilaafah established, it turned out "social justice" was nowhere to be seen amongst the 150,000 or so dead men, women and children whose lives were wasted therein, and the actual condition of the people (as it relates to what is between them and Allaah) did not fundamentally change from what it was.

So in summary, I am with you, & against these power hungry bearded politicians

BUT

You are using terms which are not helpful. Wahhabism? At the forefront of Muslims in the UK warning about these people of misguidance and refuting them and outlining there problems publicly are people who learn from Muhammad Bin Abdul-Wahhaab's many books. This is where the term Wahhabbi comes from. It is used by the ignorant who don't like that his works destroy what they and their fathers are upon in terms innovated principles within the religion.

I have not read all 5 pages and I don't feel the internet is the best place to discuss these things but.............