Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

400 bhp sti vs 400 bhp evo 9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 April 2013, 05:50 PM
  #1  
SUBARU-STI-2005
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SUBARU-STI-2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: london
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 400 bhp sti vs 400 bhp evo 9

OK SO THE SAME QUESTION BEEN ASKED ON MLR THEY SEEM TO GIVE A HONEST OPINION SO NICE TO HEAR YOUR HONEST OPINION GUYS HERES THE LINK

http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=449409

hi guys looking at both cars 2005 sti or or 2005 evo 9 just wondering how they like in comparison once they reached both up to 400 bhp and the cost..etc


reliabilty

cost

drivabilty

power delivery

performance

0-60 0-100 1/4 mile

tuneing

planning to run either on the standard internals so what would be the limits on both and how will both compare to each other on the limit on standard internal being safe thanks any thing else please add on
Old 18 April 2013, 05:53 PM
  #2  
stuart148
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
stuart148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: colchester
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i like both and having owned both id say Evo

stu
Old 18 April 2013, 05:55 PM
  #3  
SUBARU-STI-2005
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SUBARU-STI-2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: london
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah mate both great cars
Old 18 April 2013, 05:57 PM
  #4  
sc22
Scooby Newbie
 
sc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: leeds
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Iv read the thread on mlr there more to the evo as people on here are going to be more to the subaru...
But your asking in comparison I have a 350bhp wrx 03 blobeye
Friend has a evo 9 fq340 and mine wipes the floor with it , but a lot cheaper to tune the evo! And looks wise some blobs look nice some 9s look nice 50/50 on that
Old 18 April 2013, 06:02 PM
  #5  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

you wont get an honest answer. mlr will say evo, scoobynet scooby.
Old 18 April 2013, 06:05 PM
  #6  
stuart148
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
stuart148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: colchester
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuart148
i like both and having owned both id say Evo

stu


aint that honest
Old 18 April 2013, 06:05 PM
  #7  
sc22
Scooby Newbie
 
sc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: leeds
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
you wont get an honest answer. mlr will say evo, scoobynet scooby.
Exaclty but them saying on mlr subaru is a poor mans evo! Pfft give over its just pure choice! 1/4 times you just have to look at TOTB to see who wins them hands down
Old 18 April 2013, 06:06 PM
  #8  
stonejedi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
stonejedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,439
Received 149 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

both good cars really comes down to driver skill.SJ.
Old 18 April 2013, 06:08 PM
  #9  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sc22
Exaclty but them saying on mlr subaru is a poor mans evo! Pfft give over its just pure choice! 1/4 times you just have to look at TOTB to see who wins them hands down
this year gtr,,,, lol

scoob def sounds better than the evo for sure though, i dont even think evo owners can argue that point hahahaha
Old 18 April 2013, 06:10 PM
  #10  
AndyBaker
Scooby Regular
 
AndyBaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Grantham
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stonejedi
both good cars really comes down to driver skill.SJ.
Old 18 April 2013, 06:11 PM
  #11  
sc22
Scooby Newbie
 
sc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: leeds
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We're talking about evos and subarus lol gtr's in a different league all together
Old 18 April 2013, 06:18 PM
  #12  
SUBARU-STI-2005
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SUBARU-STI-2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: london
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
this year gtr,,,, lol

scoob def sounds better than the evo for sure though, i dont even think evo owners can argue that point hahahaha
SOUNDS GREAT
Old 18 April 2013, 06:23 PM
  #13  
Kezzo80
Scooby Regular
 
Kezzo80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chester, NW
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've owned 2 evos and their great cars. But I'll definitely be scratching that STI itch this year.
Old 18 April 2013, 06:35 PM
  #14  
SUBARU-STI-2005
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SUBARU-STI-2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: london
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh well ive exceeded my post limit on mlr thats another point for the scooby lol
Old 18 April 2013, 06:41 PM
  #15  
harrisard
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
harrisard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: walton,essex
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've owned 1 evo and 3 scoobs.....nuf said!!!

Harri
Old 18 April 2013, 06:44 PM
  #16  
harrisard
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
harrisard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: walton,essex
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also scoobynet is a more helpful/friendly forum compared to mlr.
Old 18 April 2013, 06:50 PM
  #17  
SUBARU-STI-2005
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SUBARU-STI-2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: london
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it was said the evo was more of a drivers car but with the electronics ? i would think its less of a drivers car as the electronics would take the drivers involvement out /? not sure if this opinion of mines is fact or fiction true or flase
Old 18 April 2013, 07:01 PM
  #18  
Truss
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Truss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When i bought my STI, I did my homework on both cars.
The main things that sold me on the subaru was the more reasonable servicing costs (its the cheapest car i've had to look after), Evo's seems a bit more highly strung and almost fragile ( I have 2 mates with them and they've had a few nasty bills) and lastly, the noise of a UK impreza.
I genuinely went into this with no bias toward either, and im loving my impreza.
Old 18 April 2013, 07:03 PM
  #19  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

There is some utter bollocks posted on that thread.
Old 18 April 2013, 07:10 PM
  #20  
stuart148
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
stuart148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: colchester
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

service cost are the same
oil
plugs
gear oil
diff / ayc oil
filters

same on both cars and as for the 4.5k intervals
oil and filter on any turbo car at least every 5k in my eyes

like i say iv had a wrx, sti's , type r's , p1, wr1
also Evo 6,7,8,9

the evo's feel a better drive than the newage and the classic feels a bit raw
the subarus sound better and the evo's give you confidence

so to sum it up i love both end of lol
stu
Old 18 April 2013, 07:12 PM
  #21  
toyney83
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
toyney83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: grimsby
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Owned an fq300 mr and a 2005 sti with ppp at the same time. Both great cars and the Evo was quicker. Sold the Evo but still have the scoob. I couldn't tell you why, just seemed more drawn to the scoob
Old 18 April 2013, 07:12 PM
  #22  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Lol at the guy saying the EVO is more of a drivers car

Cost wise, it's well documented that the EVO costs considerably more to run and buy so the scoob wins in the over all costings as a 400 bhp car.


As for reliability, I think they both have their various issues so that's 6 and 2x3, but as long as you chose the right mapper and get some gauges to keep an eye on things the 2.0L engine is pretty reliable and the 6 speed box is very strong.

I'd go for 450bhp on the scoob as cost wise there is bugger all in it, SC46 as opposed to SC42.

The main difference for me is the sound, EVO sound does nothing for me, neither will win any beauty competitions, oh and you need to be able to drive to own a scoob.

If you want a car that will be better out of the box for the same money as the Evo i'd suggest a JDM STI or even better a Spec C, which are more comparable to the EVO than the UK STI.
Old 18 April 2013, 07:33 PM
  #23  
BBB3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
BBB3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 3,662
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Impreza = cheap to maintain
Evo = Better built

As above somewhere anyone can own a fast car but if they don't not know who to use it
Is good as a chocolate fire guard

I own a evo 8 MR and would happily own a impreza again
Old 18 April 2013, 07:40 PM
  #24  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toyney83
Owned an fq300 mr and a 2005 sti with ppp at the same time. Both great cars and the Evo was quicker. Sold the Evo but still have the scoob. I couldn't tell you why, just seemed more drawn to the scoob
mr clarkson did a test on TG between an STI and Evo (about 2005) and he said EXACTLY the same thing

He concluded that the Evo was the "better" car, but when he walked up to the cars to drive one home, he chose the Scooby!!!!!!!! (everytime)
Old 18 April 2013, 07:45 PM
  #25  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Scooby has a bigger fuel tank...

Evo delivers it's torque in a much more useable manner.

dunx

P.S. My pal has a >400 bhp Evo VI and we can't separate the two.
Old 18 April 2013, 07:47 PM
  #26  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
There is some utter bollocks posted on that thread.
It's MLR, to be expected.
Old 18 April 2013, 08:06 PM
  #27  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
It's MLR, to be expected.
I wouldn't dare be that bold Sir!
Old 18 April 2013, 08:20 PM
  #28  
nyscooby
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
nyscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,785
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had a GTR R34... couldn't take it anywhere, pointless cars..... too low, too long, 12mpg... expensive to fix, no one knows much about them (up north)

Prefer the smaller Scoob/Evo, had both... prefer the scoob... more manageable day to day.

The insurance is half that of the evo..... (and i'm 40!)
Old 18 April 2013, 08:22 PM
  #29  
PrimeKos
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
PrimeKos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bagshot
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I recently had 10K to spend and test drove loads of Scooby's and Evo's during my adventures to find my next car. Truth be told the Evo felt slightly quicker in the real world but I just could'nt ignore the awesome sound that the Scooby made in comparison. Everytime I got behind the steering wheel and went for a test drive it made the hairs on my arms stand up. I was really thrown between the Evo's performance and the Scooby's thrills.. I then came across an advert for a mint GB270 Wagon and I was sold.. No Evo mattered after that..
Old 18 April 2013, 08:30 PM
  #30  
BBB3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
BBB3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 3,662
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nyscooby
I had a GTR R34... couldn't take it anywhere, pointless cars..... too low, too long, 12mpg... expensive to fix, no one knows much about them (up north)

Prefer the smaller Scoob/Evo, had both... prefer the scoob... more manageable day to day.

The insurance is half that of the evo..... (and i'm 40!)

The evo is a bit more look where subaru's are common these days,
But the evo is not very easy to use day to day and I'm 26
Both nice cars and both have there bad things
Its down the the person and there bank account


Quick Reply: 400 bhp sti vs 400 bhp evo 9



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 PM.