GC8 Impreza EZ30 Twin Turbo
#1
GC8 Impreza EZ30 Twin Turbo
There were some pictures leaked around, of the twin turbo engined GC8 Impreza, being built by RA Motorsport for a customer abroad.
Despite the serious setbacks and unforeseen problems with suppliers and letdowns from people they relied upon to get the car finished in time - the car is now complete, fully mapped, tried at the track, and up and running. That makes it, to the best of my knowledge - the first Twin Turbo EZ30 engined GC8 in the world - correct me if i'm wrong there, but i'm pretty sure it's the first one in Europe.
What i'm pretty certain is that it's among the most powerful ones.
Few pics to get you started, until i get a hold of some official results and time slips.
Despite the serious setbacks and unforeseen problems with suppliers and letdowns from people they relied upon to get the car finished in time - the car is now complete, fully mapped, tried at the track, and up and running. That makes it, to the best of my knowledge - the first Twin Turbo EZ30 engined GC8 in the world - correct me if i'm wrong there, but i'm pretty sure it's the first one in Europe.
What i'm pretty certain is that it's among the most powerful ones.
Few pics to get you started, until i get a hold of some official results and time slips.
#4
@ABW
Is there car over...where exactly? It's right where it's supposed to be, in Belgrade, Serbia.
Nice bodykit, btw. Didn't think much of it, honestly, but at the end it turned out to look brutal
As for the runs, it will be well documented as i plan to visit a few events in Hungary, Austria, etc - possibly even Santa Pod next year.
Is there car over...where exactly? It's right where it's supposed to be, in Belgrade, Serbia.
Nice bodykit, btw. Didn't think much of it, honestly, but at the end it turned out to look brutal
As for the runs, it will be well documented as i plan to visit a few events in Hungary, Austria, etc - possibly even Santa Pod next year.
Trending Topics
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting air filters you have there! Stay out of gravel traps
Its great to see a 6 pot in a classic, will be good to see the figure / times it can achieve
Its great to see a 6 pot in a classic, will be good to see the figure / times it can achieve
#16
All that for the sake of looks? Don't think so
Btw, the wet weight (all liquids plus 20l of fuel) with drag tires is 1132kg. Not that bad, but still, lots of space for improvement. "Thought it might be lighter" i hear you say, but keep in mind the HUGE automatic gearbox, plus the twin turbo setup and all that goes with it, exhausts, etc. - that's at LEAST 50kg extra over the 4 pot setup. Well worth it, though.
Air filters are...work in progress
Last edited by Pereca; 02 September 2010 at 11:51 AM.
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
...and make the tail heavier then it needs to be? Plus, add another 10-15kg of pipes and liquid to route the coolant from the front to the back? Or at least you'd have to mess about with the roll bars as water conduits, which would not seem like a bright idea in case you had an accident, with all that water pouring over you from the bent pipes...
All that for the sake of looks? Don't think so
All that for the sake of looks? Don't think so
If the rad and pipes were situated correctly the driver wouldn't get water pouring all over them in the event of an accident. Not really any different to having a swirl pot and the lines run inside the car imo.
Aside from just looks the huge and no doubt expensive front mount could then have been protected. It'll only take 1 stone flicked up from a car in front and kiss it goodbye.
Don't get me wrong it's a great piece of engineering but those couple of bits would have made it 100% for me. I'm a believer of function over form but there's a point when things have to look right too.
#19
You'd be absolutely right in your reasoning about the rad relocation, were it not for one single thing: this is not a track car, its sole purpose and use is for drag racing, nothing else. Hence my reluctance to put any more weight over the rear axle as that would only make it squat more at the back, which is not so good for traction. The car, statically, is very nose heavy, exactly what you want on a drag car.
So, the rad had nowhere else to go but the front of the car. FMIC nees to be protected, absolutely right there...
So, the rad had nowhere else to go but the front of the car. FMIC nees to be protected, absolutely right there...
#22
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A rear rad doesn't add such a huge amount of weight, it would be worth considering in the future if required. My concern with your current setup is getting the air through the intercooler and through the very thick rad and then around the engine. But only time will tell if you need to make changes, even on a drag car.
...and make the tail heavier then it needs to be? Plus, add another 10-15kg of pipes and liquid to route the coolant from the front to the back? Or at least you'd have to mess about with the roll bars as water conduits, which would not seem like a bright idea in case you had an accident, with all that water pouring over you from the bent pipes...
All that for the sake of looks? Don't think so
Btw, the wet weight (all liquids plus 20l of fuel) with drag tires is 1132kg. Not that bad, but still, lots of space for improvement. "Thought it might be lighter" i hear you say, but keep in mind the HUGE automatic gearbox, plus the twin turbo setup and all that goes with it, exhausts, etc. - that's at LEAST 50kg extra over the 4 pot setup. Well worth it, though.
Air filters are...work in progress
All that for the sake of looks? Don't think so
Btw, the wet weight (all liquids plus 20l of fuel) with drag tires is 1132kg. Not that bad, but still, lots of space for improvement. "Thought it might be lighter" i hear you say, but keep in mind the HUGE automatic gearbox, plus the twin turbo setup and all that goes with it, exhausts, etc. - that's at LEAST 50kg extra over the 4 pot setup. Well worth it, though.
Air filters are...work in progress
#23
Nicely noticed, the thick radiator, that's one of the main points still giving us trouble - heating issues. Nothing major, but still...Rad will be changed to thinner one with stronger pull fans. Also we will need to redo the secondary, cabin coolant circuit bypass, as i fear we might have made a small mistake in there somewhere....
The problem we are having at the moment is that the car gets too hot for my liking, from time to time. Thermostat is a bit too hot, so we took it out for the time being, not to cause restriction - still car gets too hot, even while driving, and it immediately cools down after we douse the rad with some cool water. Which might indicate insufficient speed or quantity of water circulation through the rad, as it obviously accumulates heat. Now, that could be down to the fact that it is too thick, which will be corrected soon. The other reason might be the incorrect bypass of the cabin cooling circuit, we might have disrupted the flow around the engine and interconnected something we shouldn't have, creating a swirl, or a potential restriction point...
Does anybody have an exploded, clear or self-explanatory diagram of H6 secondary cooling circuit water circulation diagram, or the whole cooling system diagram, with directions indicated clearly, so i can double check?
#25
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM