Do fmic's and cone filters affect mpg
Or does it not matter, just wondered
I'd thought about putting mine back to standard that way as I've never been a fan of either of them anyway |
If mpg bothers you I think you should sell up and buy a diesel.
|
Originally Posted by marshall332bhp
(Post 11184363)
If mpg bothers you I think you should sell up and buy a diesel.
Anyway I think cone filters do affect mpg not sure about front mounts. |
Thanks Daz, I thought cones did but not sure about fmic's
Marshal, if you can't say any constructive shut up....we don't all mods like that, and if a tmic was good enough for Colin McRae it's good enough for ordinary arseholse |
I think a fmic would as it compresses more density air thus more fuel would go in the mix too? That's just my thinking, and a cone filter would too as it lets more air through too??
|
Certainly, if you had both you would need map adjustments. The combination would have an effect on mpg, not necessarily for the worse if mapped well.
JohnD |
I'd have said it would indirectly affect mpg.
Why put an FMIC on? Usually as part of a mod, which increases bhp, which decreases mpg etc. etc. I agree with JohnD about remapping. It certainly doesn't automatically mean less mpg (got about 5% better mpg with about 7% more bhp on a recent wise investment in JGM's skills). |
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184380)
Thanks Daz, I thought cones did but not sure about fmic's
Marshal, if you can't say any constructive shut up....we don't all mods like that, and if a tmic was good enough for Colin McRae it's good enough for ordinary arseholse |
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184380)
Thanks Daz, I thought cones did but not sure about fmic's
Marshal, if you can't say any constructive shut up....we don't all mods like that, and if a tmic was good enough for Colin McRae it's good enough for ordinary arseholse i think you'll find colin mcrae didnt run a top mount lol |
Originally Posted by dazzaturbo
(Post 11184365)
Not really what he asked is it.
|
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184380)
Thanks Daz, I thought cones did but not sure about fmic's
Marshal, if you can't say any constructive shut up....we don't all mods like that, and if a tmic was good enough for Colin McRae it's good enough for ordinary arseholse so you have no idea of the benefits of a fmic, colins wasn't a cheapy production top mount. induction kits and fmic wont effect mpg at all if using the same turbo and injectors. your right foot is what effects mpg and if mapped correctly the car will have better mpg than a standard one. |
When I swapped to a bigger turbo with fmic (amongst other engine upgrades, injectors, etc.) and remap from Duncan, I got a big jump in power and better MPG than stock.
|
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184380)
Thanks Daz, I thought cones did but not sure about fmic's
Marshal, if you can't say any constructive shut up....we don't all mods like that, and if a tmic was good enough for Colin McRae it's good enough for ordinary arseholse Did you really think that the old WRC Imprezas ran a top mount? :lol: |
Originally Posted by *matthewturb2000*
(Post 11184384)
I think a fmic would as it compresses more density air thus more fuel would go in the mix too? That's just my thinking, and a cone filter would too as it lets more air through too??
do you actually know what 'FMIC' stands for? and do you know what the turbo actually does? genuine questions lol |
Originally Posted by Fudgey
(Post 11184618)
While we are all having fun lol...
do you actually know what 'FMIC' stands for? and do you know what the turbo actually does? genuine questions lol he has been reading max power innit:lol1: cant beat "I think" tuning. |
that went tits up a good few years back.
shame really as they started off the whole uk tuning/modifying industry. but dont get me wrong, i dint buy nor read it (ok i may have bought at a guess maybe 2 issues lol) as the content was not exactly to my taste. but in the early years they did have some decent motors in there before it became all chavtastic with saxo's etc but yeah, this chap has obviously got his wires crossed somewhere! |
Originally Posted by Fudgey
(Post 11184620)
that went tits up a good few years back.
shame really as they started off the whole uk tuning/modifying industry. but dont get me wrong, i dint buy nor read it (ok i may have bought at a guess maybe 2 issues lol) as the content was not exactly to my taste. but in the early years they did have some decent motors in there before it became all chavtastic with saxo's etc but yeah, this chap has obviously got his wires crossed somewhere! JohnD |
i do remember CCC lol, im only 32 tho
|
Originally Posted by JohnD
(Post 11184628)
"Cars and Car conversions" was the one to buy. A serious tuning mag (before it was considered necessary to include t*ts and b*ms) - probably before you were born! Who remembers that mag?
JohnD I do , im not of that vintage but my dad used to buy it, far more would be learnt from that. max power was mostly plastic bodkykits and tits. which would probably explain the above mechanical knowledge:D |
Originally Posted by Fudgey
(Post 11184620)
that went tits up a good few years back.
shame really as they started off the whole uk tuning/modifying industry. but dont get me wrong, i dint buy nor read it (ok i may have bought at a guess maybe 2 issues lol) as the content was not exactly to my taste. but in the early years they did have some decent motors in there before it became all chavtastic with saxo's etc but yeah, this chap has obviously got his wires crossed somewhere! And I was only 15/16 at the time. :D |
Originally Posted by Gear Head
(Post 11184642)
I used to read it and I'm not embarressed. More for tits and arse than the cars though.
And I was only 15/16 at the time. :D |
Originally Posted by Fudgey
(Post 11184618)
do you actually know what 'FMIC' stands for?
and do you know what the turbo actually does? I didnt fit it and think part of the reason I was going to put the standard setp up back was the stones ect that can fic's as they're the first thing to get hit Would a 95 still be able for mapping or is it to old I thought Mr Mcrae's cars were tic's, I stand corrected, sorry |
Marshal....sorry for telling you to shut up earlier :o
|
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184872)
Marshal....sorry for telling you to shut up earlier :o
|
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184870)
Yes, yes
I didnt fit it and think part of the reason I was going to put the standard setp up back was the stones ect that can fic's as they're the first thing to get hit Would a 95 still be able for mapping or is it to old I thought Mr Mcrae's cars were tic's, I stand corrected, sorry |
Originally Posted by stu9
(Post 11184870)
Yes, yes
I didnt fit it and think part of the reason I was going to put the standard setp up back was the stones ect that can fic's as they're the first thing to get hit Would a 95 still be able for mapping or is it to old I thought Mr Mcrae's cars were tic's, I stand corrected, sorry Tbh, ive been around tuned cars for quite a while now and i have not heard of many front mounts being holed by stones etc. yes they bend cooling fins etc, but the actual bar and plate is rather tough, unless you hit something big I once holed the fmic on my old citoren dispatch... But i had just used a zafira as a brake lol.... As for your question does an induction kit use more fuel... Imo yes. I like the sound so drive the car harder lol :cry: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands