![]() |
Rolf Harris......
:Suspiciou
|
tbh i think the whole thing is becoming silly now, they seem to be arresting folks all over the place.
'Their witches i tell thee, burn them!' sound familiar? |
I can't see what it is yet.:wonder:
|
Originally Posted by legb4rsk
(Post 11063751)
I can't see what it is yet.:wonder:
|
Two little boys?
|
|
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 11063750)
tbh i think the whole thing is becoming silly now, they seem to be arresting folks all over the place.
|
Can you tell what he is yet?
|
Operation Fernbridge is the real one to watch
|
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063763)
Perhaps because the veil of secrecy has finally been lifted?
possibly but have any charges been brought yet because of it? Right now were in a situation where media are naming poeple and folks are assuming there guilty. |
One particular female apparently,
Who hasn't raised the subject all these years..... |
|
|
Originally Posted by dpb
(Post 11063793)
One particular female apparently,
Who hasn't raised the subject all these years..... |
i tell her it is good for sore throats |
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063852)
Not sure what your point is. Perhaps she did raise it at the time and was blown out, or thought (quite reasonably) that she would be so didn't bother. Either way, if he's been arrested it sounds like he has a case to answer.
Extract form gov website 'If you’re arrested, you’ll usually be taken to a police station, held in custody in a cell and then questioned. After you have been taken to a police station, you may be released or charged with a crime.' In this case he's been released to return to the station at a given time aka police bail. All they have done is ask him some questions, nothing more, nothing less. Yet you've already assumed he's done something, just like the media make the reports sound. |
At no point have I said he's done anything, but then I've not said he's done nothing either. And it needs 'reasonable grounds' to arrest someone so like I say, it would appear he has a case to answer.
|
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063866)
At no point have I said he's done anything, but then I've not said he's done nothing either. And it needs 'reasonable grounds' to arrest someone so like I say, it would appear he has a case to answer.
Accusations can be fabricated, you admit you say 'it appears' he has a case to answer, yet have no knowledge of the exact allogations or if theres any evidence of a crime being commited. |
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063866)
At no point have I said he's done anything, but then I've not said he's done nothing either. And it needs 'reasonable grounds' to arrest someone so like I say, it would appear he has a case to answer.
|
I'm going on the information to hand; he's been arrested and questioned, his house searched, and has been bailed pending further inquiries until May. In light of this, it is more than just a case of he-said she-said.
|
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 11063882)
Jesus, whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty?"
|
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063885)
I'm going on the information to hand; he's been arrested and questioned, his house searched, and has been bailed pending further inquiries until May. In light of this, it is more than just a case of he-said she-said.
|
Wonder what he said to his victim/s?
"can you guess where my hand is yet?" |
Originally Posted by Kwik
(Post 11063902)
Here you are insinuating there is more than just suspicion.
|
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063885)
it is more than just a case of he-said she-said.
|
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063885)
I'm going on the information to hand; he's been arrested and questioned, his house searched, and has been bailed pending further inquiries until May. In light of this, it is more than just a case of he-said she-said.
Someone could make the same accusation of you, right now, with no evidence. The response would be the same; arrest, search and bail. It has to happen that way to minimise the chance of you hiding/destroying evidence. So again; at this point, no it's not "more than just a case of he-said she-said". If there is a case to answer, charges will be brought against him. Until that happens, the only information to hand is that he was arrested, questioned and bailed. Anything more than that is uninformed speculative conjecture. |
So you're saying, I can right now go into a police station and tell them some complete stranger assaulted me (whose address I know), and they'd go search their house? No prior checks of its legitimacy?
If that is true, then I am both happy to back-track on what I have said above, and mortified. |
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063941)
So you're saying, I can right now go into a police station and tell them some complete stranger assaulted me (whose address I know), and they'd go search their house? No prior checks of its legitimacy?
If that is true, then I am both happy to back-track on what I have said above, and mortified. |
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11063941)
So you're saying, I can right now go into a police station and tell them some complete stranger assaulted me (whose address I know), and they'd go search their house? No prior checks of its legitimacy?
If that is true, then I am both happy to back-track on what I have said above, and mortified. |
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 11063946)
if they took you seriously yes.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:00 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands