Air Drama Unfolding Over Lancashire
A US Airways Boeing 767-201 on flight no. US711 has been circling over the St. Helens area this morning to burn off its fuel before attempting a landing at Manchester Airport.
No one knows why they requested to land at Manchester. It's on it's way to the runway now. Wonder what it's all about? http://www.flightradar24.com/ Locate Manchester, go to playback and enter 13.00 hours and look for the plane. Code AWE711 |
You're right, it appeared to circle over St. Helens for ages. Now just landed at Manchester I think. Was going to Chicago from Zurich yes?
|
That website is really interesting
|
That's the one.
Other planes are landing again there so I guess that it was an OK landing. The local radio were keeping tight lipped when I phoned them, they just said that the pilot requested Manchester and no other airport. |
Originally Posted by Tony Harrington
(Post 10919975)
That website is really interesting
Click on a plane, then in the left panel that opens click on the plane Reg. and you get taken to another page where there is info about the plane plus a list of sites that have images of the plane. |
Originally Posted by Oldun
(Post 10919976)
That's the one.
Other planes are landing again there so I guess that it was an OK landing. The local radio were keeping tight lipped when I phoned them, they just said that the pilot requested Manchester and no other airport. |
That's right, they have a second runway too so in theory if one is closed off the other can be used.
|
The plane appears on the screen at 11.16. that's a long time to be circling for.
|
Confirmed by Radio Merseyside, it was a technical problem, plane is due to depart again later today.
Everyone safe and no problems when landing.:thumb: |
Originally Posted by Oldun
(Post 10920006)
Confirmed by Radio Merseyside, it was a technical problem, plane is due to depart again later today.
Everyone safe and no problems when landing.:thumb: |
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 10919981)
If I am right in thinking Manchester has the longest runway of airports in the north of the UK so I wonder if that is why he wanted Manchester!
|
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 10920045)
Nope, the one at Robin Hood is longer.
|
This is where you get real stats from....
http://www.ukaccs.info/profiles.htm You would be surprised who owns these airports too. |
The plane has taken off again.
I wonder what the passengers are thinking? |
Originally Posted by Oldun
(Post 10920096)
The plane has taken off again.
I wonder what the passengers are thinking? The captain came over the tannoy and said 'Just before we attempt our seocnd takeoff of the day I am going to ask the cabin crew to go through the safety procedures once again and something tells me you will be listening this time' :lol1: |
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 10919981)
If I am right in thinking Manchester has the longest runway of airports in the north of the UK so I wonder if that is why he wanted Manchester!
That's my thinking; Seeing that its the only airport in the UK that will accept the Antonov AN-225 (World's largest airplane thats still in service to anyone who doesn't know...google it :cool: ). I'll take a wild stab that its a undercarriage issue (not locked properly or something). :) |
Originally Posted by ALi-B
(Post 10920122)
That's my thinking; Seeing that its the only airport in the UK that will accept the Antonov AN-225
(World's largest airplane thats still in service to anyone who doesn't know...google it :cool: ). I'll take a wild stab that its a undercarriage issue (not locked properly or something). :) Amazing you can get all of that info from that Flightradar site. |
The Antonov 225 going into Manchester may be due to taxiways rather than the runway itself.
|
Originally Posted by Oldun
(Post 10920006)
Confirmed by Radio Merseyside, it was a technical problem, plane is due to depart again later today.
Everyone safe and no problems when landing.:thumb: |
could be a number of things, a hydraulic failure (or light indicating so) which would mean some flaps were inoperable at landing, meaning a lighter aircraft would be easier to stop with sub standard braking capabilities.
this can be quite common, and is often a result of faulty indicator lights rather than landing equipment, but the crew have a protocol to folllow to minimise risk. a landing with reduced braking capability can lead to overheated brakes and potentially undercarraige fires, or even an overshooting of the runway. seems they took decisions to land as light an aircraft as possible - depending on there reeasoning, id say agree with the guys flying the plane :thumb: |
Originally Posted by ALi-B
(Post 10920122)
That's my thinking; Seeing that its the only airport in the UK that will accept the Antonov AN-225
(World's largest airplane thats still in service to anyone who doesn't know...google it :cool: ). I'll take a wild stab that its a undercarriage issue (not locked properly or something). :) more then likely just a fault in the swithc ect but saftey actions need to be followed. unlocked undercarraige would be way down my list of scenarios - altho not impossible. |
I'm proved wrong then.
Robin Hood, ex RAF Finningley must have had the longest RAF base runway then. It was always something they went on about on open days. |
that site is good. whats cool is when you click on an aircraft there is a cockpit view at the bottom using google earth and real time data you can see out the cockpit window!
|
Oh, yes, I'd forgotten about that feature
Here's an example for you. http://www.flightradar24.com/AAL141/view (only valid whilst the plane is flying.) |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 10920270)
I'm proved wrong then.
Robin Hood, ex RAF Finningley must have had the longest RAF base runway then. It was always something they went on about on open days. but my memory is from the 1960's when my father was stationed there - believe it was lengthened to accommodate the Vulcan.. |
With CAA legislation any r/w need to far extent any expected aircraft likely to use it, same as likely RFFS availability.
itll only be the most heaviuly laden cat 8 or 9 aricraft that couldnt use most uk airstrips. even then in emergencies it maybe possible, with colsure of many raf bases we see more and more milititary aircraft using our runwamy includning C17 aircraft, or code e cat 8 - which are huge! |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 10920270)
I'm proved wrong then.
Robin Hood, ex RAF Finningley must have had the longest RAF base runway then. It was always something they went on about on open days. |
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 10920049)
Robin Hood 2837m vs Manchester 3048m.... can't believe I looked that up.... slow day here :lol1:
|
Originally Posted by GC8
(Post 10920676)
Theres an awfull ot less to hit in the surrounding area, though. Wiping out Finningley village would be acceptable collateral damage! :D
|
Nothing more exciting than a problem with the air conditioning system.....
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands