ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   The new trend for splitting movies into two parts and now three!!! (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/944867-the-new-trend-for-splitting-movies-into-two-parts-and-now-three.html)

f1_fan 31 July 2012 01:21 AM

The new trend for splitting movies into two parts and now three!!!
 
It seems to me that Hollywood has a relatively new trend, that is the unnecessary splitting of films into two parts where one would have done.

Tarantino was forced by Miramax, I think it was, to split Kill Bill into two parts, then we had the final Harry Potter Book made into a 2 part movie (which considering there had been six of them before that was a step too far IMO), then Twilight and now..... the bloody Hobbit is to be THREE parts ... FFS!!!

What with remaking films that don't need remaking and this latest gimmick it seems little orginality and creativity remains in mainstream Hollywood movie making. :mad:

JohnSmith 31 July 2012 07:40 AM

It is because all the pirates do it as films wouldn't fit on one cd back in the day :D


Star Wars was originally something like a 9 hour film when presented to the studios, so they made that into 3 (originally) but was always meant to be 6 after that, and ultimately 9 (but that will never happen)

Nimbus 31 July 2012 08:37 AM

I thought The Hobbit was going to be two parts (An Unexpected Journey, and There and Back Again).

alcazar 31 July 2012 09:12 AM

The Hobbit in three parts? Hmmmm, comparing the books, LOTR is about 1200 pages, and made THREE films, The Hobbit is around 400 pages........

Maybe they'll put EVERY scene in? Or even more songs to aid soundtrack sales, like Disney do?

I'll still go and see it mind, even though the Americans have, once again, put WOMEN at the centre of things. I can't actually remember a female character in the book:confused:

urban 31 July 2012 09:19 AM

Its all about extracting as much money from a film as possible.

Neanderthal 31 July 2012 09:38 AM

Hmmm getting 3 films out of the Hobbit whilst still leaving him extra footage to release as director cuts on Blu-ray 6 months after the theatrical cut was released seems like he might struggle?

f1_fan 31 July 2012 09:56 AM


Originally Posted by Nimbus (Post 10731016)
I thought The Hobbit was going to be two parts (An Unexpected Journey, and There and Back Again).

Hobbit director confirms trilogy

An Unexpected

Journey there

Back again

???? ;)

Gear Head 31 July 2012 10:17 AM

Money. Nothing more.

corradoboy 31 July 2012 11:10 AM

As on LOTR, Jackson is rumoured to be hopelessly over budget and behind on filming. It is alleged that he is a hopeless decision maker and insists on constant re-shoots, re-writes and changes. On LOTR Lucasfilm and ILM were drafted in 5 months before FOTR was released as they knew there wasn't a hope in Hell it would be finished with just PJ and Weta, and history seems to be repeating. If FOTR had bombed, the other two films may have been shelved, or been rushed out cheap to cut losses, but thankfully the public enjoyed it and allowed the completion of what ended up a masterpiece. I hope PJ works his creative magic again and serves up another fantasy epic, using the appendices from The Hobbit and other material from LOTR, The Silmarillion and other Tolkein works. Extending it to a trilogy is indeed about money, but more to do with covering their initial losses and allowing more time to finish off PJ's vision of Middle Earth.

ALi-B 31 July 2012 11:20 AM

Star Wars trilogy (IV, V and VI ).

New trend?

OK whatever you say :D

f1_fan 31 July 2012 11:22 AM


Originally Posted by ALi-B (Post 10731143)
Star Wars trilogy.

New trend?

OK whatever you say :D

Ever the smart ar5e.... it's not worth commenting further!

ALi-B 31 July 2012 11:29 AM

Thats a bit hypocritcal isn't it? :eek:

Fat Boy 31 July 2012 01:41 PM

Tut tut

(Godfather I,II, & III ;) )

windyboy 31 July 2012 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by Fat Boy (Post 10731343)
Tut tut

(Godfather I,II, & III ;) )

what about The Bible... ? how many film's has it been made into ??? :lol1:

It's all about the money money money

Leslie 31 July 2012 02:12 PM

One can only suspect a cynical exercise to make more cash.

Les

JohnSmith 31 July 2012 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by ALi-B (Post 10731143)
Star Wars trilogy (IV, V and VI ).

New trend?

OK whatever you say :D

See post 2 :p

GC8 31 July 2012 08:20 PM


Originally Posted by windyboy (Post 10731383)
what about The Bible... ? It's all about the money money money


Still waiting for the sequel though!

cster 01 August 2012 07:43 AM

Well ,that's why I've never bothered with movies since Jean de Florette!

jpor 01 August 2012 08:56 AM

Okay so you would see a Film:

a).. Tell Half a story
b).. Be over 6 hours long!

I personally wouldnt want to sit through a film for 6 hours straight in the Cinema :(

EddScott 01 August 2012 11:30 AM

I don't see what the problem is.

If the subject matter is decent enough then it wouldn't bother me to have 3 films to enjoy rather than 2.

Money or otherwise its no fuss to me.

urban 01 August 2012 11:34 AM


Originally Posted by jpor (Post 10732579)
I personally wouldnt want to sit through a film for 6 hours straight in the Cinema :(

Nor would I
3 hours max

However, if the 6 hour film was split in half, how much would you remember say a year later when the second instalment is released

corradoboy 01 August 2012 02:01 PM

The DVD would normally be released allowing you to recap :idea: On LOTR the theatrical DVD was released around June the following year for each film, then the extended cut in early December just before the nest film hit the cinema. I had dodgy Korean discs slightly before the cinema release for the last 2, and in Jan after the first :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands